Social Indicators Research

, Volume 116, Issue 3, pp 713–729 | Cite as

Measuring and Analysing the Wellbeing of Australia’s Indigenous Population

  • Nicholas BiddleEmail author


According to most standard socioeconomic indicators (for example employment, income and education), Indigenous Australians tend to have worse outcomes than their non-Indigenous counterparts. Most objective health indicators including life expectancy also tend to be worse. Traditionally, these two domains and associated objective indicators have been the focus of research, government policy and evaluation. There has been less research, however, on differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians in subjective measures of wellbeing. In this paper, I attempt to answer three related research questions on Indigenous wellbeing—What is the average level of emotional wellbeing and satisfaction with life for the Indigenous and non-Indigenous population of Australia? How do the differences between the two populations change once other characteristics have been controlled for? What are the factors associated with emotional wellbeing within the Indigenous population? With regards to the first two questions, Indigenous Australians are less likely to report frequent periods of happiness and more likely to report periods of extreme sadness than the non-Indigenous population. Surprisingly, given these results for emotional wellbeing, a major finding from the analysis was that Indigenous Australians were significantly more likely to report above-average satisfaction with their life. The main finding with regards to the third question is that using retrospective measures, those in remote areas report higher levels of happiness than those in non-remote areas. This is different to the results for socioeconomic status and objective measures of health found elsewhere and has important implications for government policy in Australia.


Emotional wellbeing Life satisfaction Survey data Australia Indigenous populations 



Funding for this paper was received from the Australian Ministerial Council of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs. The author would like to thank Ms. Gillian Cosgrove for editorial assistance.


  1. Altman, J. C. (2005). Development options on Aboriginal land: Sustainable Indigenous hybrid economies in the twenty-first century. In L. Taylor, G. Ward, G. Henderson, R. Davis, & L. Wallis (Eds.), The power of knowledge, the resonance of tradition (pp. 34–48). Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2001). Measuring wellbeing frameworks for Australian social statistics, cat. no. 4160.0. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2010). Framework for measuring wellbeing: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, 2010, cat. no. 4703.0. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics/Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (ABS/AIHW). (2008). The health and welfare of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples 2008, cat. no. 4704.0. Canberra: ABS/AIHW.Google Scholar
  5. Biddle, N. (2009a). Location and segregation: The distribution of the Indigenous population across Australia’s urban centres. Working Paper No. 53. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  6. Biddle, N. (2009b). Ranking regions: Revisiting an index of relative socioeconomic outcomes. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 15(3), 329–353.Google Scholar
  7. Biddle, N., & Yap, M. (2010). Demographic and socioeconomic outcomes across the Indigenous Australian lifecourse: Evidence from the 2006 Census. CAEPR Research Monograph No. 31. Canberra: ANU E Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cape York Institute for Policy and Leadership (CYI). (2005). Freedom, capabilities and the Cape York Reform Agenda. Cape York, Cairns: CYI.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative income, happiness and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, A., & Oswald, A. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA). (2009). Closing the gap on Indigenous disadvantage: The challenge for Australia. Canberra: FaHCSIA.Google Scholar
  12. Diener, E. (2009). Subjective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 11–58). Social Indicators Research Series 37. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Dolan, P., & White, M. (2007). How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hughes, H., Hughes, M., & Hudson, S. (2010). Private housing on Indigenous lands. Sydney: Centre for Independent Studies.Google Scholar
  15. Jordan, K., Bulloch, H., & Buchanan, G. (2010). Statistical equality and cultural difference in Indigenous wellbeing frameworks: A new expression of an enduring debate. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 45(3), 333–362.Google Scholar
  16. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 107(38), 16489–16493.Google Scholar
  17. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kingdon, G. G., & Knight, J. (2007). Community, comparisons and subjective well-being in a divided society. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(1), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lane, J. (2010). ‘Remote Chance of University’, The Australian. Viewed January 6, 2011, from
  20. Luttmer, E. (2005). Neighbours as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002.Google Scholar
  21. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Shields, M. A., Wheatley Price, S., & Wooden, M. (2009). Life satisfaction and the economic and social characteristics of neighbourhoods. Journal of Population Economics, 22(2), 421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision (SCRGSP). (2009). Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage: Key indicators 2009. Canberra: Productivity Commission.Google Scholar
  24. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Subjective and objective indicators of racial progress. Viewed November 17, 2011, from
  25. United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII). (2008). Indicators of well-being, poverty and sustainability relevant to Indigenous peoples. Accessed January 6, 2011, from
  26. Yap, M., & Biddle, N. (2010). Gender gaps in Indigenous socioeconomic outcomes: Australian regional comparisons and international possibilities. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 1(2), 1–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Research School of Social SciencesAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations