Social Indicators Research

, Volume 116, Issue 2, pp 493–507 | Cite as

The Role of Proactive Coping Strategies, Time Perspective, Perceived Efficacy on Affect Regulation, Divergent Thinking and Family Communication in Promoting Social Well-Being in Emerging Adulthood

Article

Abstract

The study analyzed the influence of time perspective, proactive coping strategies, perceived self-efficacy in affect regulation, divergent thinking and perceived quality of family communication on social well-being in a sample of 232 emerging adults. Social well-being showed positive correlations with proactive coping strategies, future-oriented time perspective, expression of positive emotions and regulation of negative emotions, divergent thinking, open communication with parents. A problematic family communication and a present-oriented time perspective were negatively correlated with social well-being. A forward Ridge step-wise regression model was conducted, evidencing four significant positive predictors of social well-being: proactive coping, perceived efficacy in affect regulation and open communication with parents; on the contrary, present oriented time perspective contributes significantly but negatively to social well-being.

Keywords

Emerging adulthood Social well-being Proactive coping Affect regulation, time perspective Family communication 

References

  1. Albanesi, C., Cicognani, E., & Zani, B. (2007). Sense of community, civic engagement and social well-being in Italian adolescents. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford: New York.Google Scholar
  4. Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1997). A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes, H. L., & Olson, D. H. (1982). Parent adolescent communication scale. In D. Olson (Ed.), Family social sciences (pp.33–48). St-Paul: University of Minesota.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Ben-Zur, H. (2003). Happy adolescents: The link between subjective well-being, internal resources and parental factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boniwell, I., Oysin, E., Linley, P. A., & Ivanchenko, G. (2010). A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing one’s time perspective in pursuit optimal functioning. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 165–179). Hoboken NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Caprara, G. V., &, Gerbino, M. (2001). Autoefficacia emotiva: la capacità di regolare l’affettività negativa e di esprimere quella positiva [Affective perceived self- efficacy: The capacity to regulate negative affect and to express positive affect]. In G. V. Caprara (Ed.) La valutazione dell’autoefficacia. Costrutti e strumenti. (Self-efficacy Assessment. Constructs and instruments) (pp. 35–50). Trento: Erikson.Google Scholar
  13. Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Cervone, D., & Artistico, D. (2003). The contribution of self-efficacy beliefs to dispositional shyness: On social-cognitive systems and the development of personality dispositions. Journal of Personality, 71, 943–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Gerbino, M., Padello, M., & Vecchio, G. M. (2006). Looking for adolescents’ well-being: Self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of positive thinking and happiness. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale [Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry], 15, 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cicognani, E., Albanesi, C., & Berti, P. (2001). Dimensioni del benessere sociale: applicazione di uno strumento di misurazione [Dimensions of social well-being: a measurement instrument]. Psicologia della Salute [Health Psychology], 1, 105–123.Google Scholar
  16. Cicognani, E., Pirini, C., Keyes, C., Joshanloo, M., Rostami, R., & Nosrabadi, M. (2008). Social participation, sense of community and social well-being: A study on American, Italian and Iranian University students. Social Indicators Research, 89, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Comunian, L., Greenglass, E. R., & Schwarzer, R. (2003). The proactive coping inventory-Italian version. http://www.psych.yorku.ca/greenglass/.
  18. Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educators. British Journal of Educational Studies, 2, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crocetti, M., Rubini, M., & Palmonari, A. (2008). Attaccamento ai genitori e ai pari come fonte di benessere sociale [Parental and peer attachment as a source of social well-being]. Psicologia della Salute [Health Psychology], 2, 63–79.Google Scholar
  20. D’Alessio, M., Guarino, A., De Pascalis, V., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Testing Zimbardo’s Stanford Time Perspective Inventory (STPI)—Short Form: An Italian Study. Time and Society, 2, 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of well-being. Time and Society, 1, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farrel, M., & Barnes, G. (1993). Family systems and social support. A test of the effects of cohesion and adaptability on the functioning of parents and adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes, it must be a process: study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150–170.Google Scholar
  24. Fluori, E., & Buchanam, A. (2002). What predicts good relationships with parents in adolescence and partners in adult life: Findings from the 1958 British Birth Cohort. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gan, Y., Manshu, Y., Yang, M., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The two-factor structure of future-oriented coping and its mediating role in student engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 851–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gielen, U., & Chumachenko, O. (2004). All the world’s children: The impact of global demographic trends and economic disparities. In U. Gielen & I. Roojnarine (Eds.), Childhood and adolescence: Cross-cultural perspective and applications (pp. 81–109). Praeger, CT: Westport.Google Scholar
  27. Greenglass, E. R. (2002). Proactive coping and quality of life management. In E. Frydenberg (Ed.), Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions, and challenges (pp. 37–62). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Greenglass, E. R., Schwarzer, R.,&, Taubert, S. (1999).The PCI. On-line publication available at: http://userpage.fu-berlin-de/health/greenpci.htm.
  29. Greenglass, E. R., Stokes, P., & Fiskenbaum, L. (2005). Engagement, work stress and well -being: Implications for psychological functioning. Stress News: The Journal of the International Stress management Association, 17, 4–7.Google Scholar
  30. Hawkins, M. T., Letcher, P., Sanson, A., Smart, D., & Toumbourou, J. W. (2009). Positive development in emerging adulthood. Australian Journal of Psychology, 2, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoerl, A. E., & Kennard, R. W. (1970). Ridge regression: Application to nonorthogonal problems. Tecnometrics, 1, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keough, K. A., Zimbardo, Ph. G., & Boyd, J. (1999). Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 2, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keyes, C. L., Ryff, C. D., & Shmotkin, D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1007–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keyes, C. L. M., & Waterman, M. B. (2003). Dimensions of well-being and mental health in adulthood. In M. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, & K. Moore (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development throughout the life course (pp. 477–497). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Lanz, M. (1997). Parent-offspring communication scale: applicazione ad un campione italiano [Parent-offspring communication scale: a study on a Italian sample]. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata [Applied Psychology Bulletin], 224, 33–38.Google Scholar
  37. Lanz, M., & Rosnati, R. (2002). Adolescent’s and young adults construction of the future: effects of family relations, self-esteem, and sense of coherence. In J. Trempala & L. E. Malmberg (Eds.), Adolescents’ future-orientation (pp. 17–34). P. Lang GmbH: Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  38. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Coping theory and research: Past, present and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 234–247.Google Scholar
  39. Leccardi, C. (2005). Facing uncertainty. Young people, time and biographies in the New Century. Young Nordic Journal of Youth Studies, 13, 123–146.Google Scholar
  40. Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 5–18.Google Scholar
  41. Masten, A. S., Burt, K. B., Roisman, G. I., Obradovic, J., Long, J. D., & Tellegen, A. (2004). Resources and resilience in the transition to adulthood: Continuity and Change. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 1071–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miles, S. (2007). Different journeys at different speeds: Young people, risk and the challenge of creative learning. Journal of Youth Studies, 3, 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nuttin, J. (1981). Motivation et perspective d’avenir. Louvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
  44. Pastorelli, C., Vecchio, G. M., & Bodo, G. (2001). La valutazione dell’autoefficacia. Costrutti e strumenti [Self-Efficacy Assessment. Constructs and instruments]. In G. V. Caprara (Ed.), Autoefficacia nelle Life Skills: soluzione dei problemi e comunicazione interpersonale [Perceived self-efficacy for problem solving scale] (pp. 137–146). Trento: Erikson.Google Scholar
  45. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scabini, E. (1995). Psicologia Sociale della Famiglia [Social Psychology of family]. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
  48. Scabini, E., Marta, E., & Lanz, M. (2006). The transition to adulthood and family relations. An intergenerational perspective. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  49. Schwartz, S. J., Coté, J. E., & Arnett, J. J. (2005). Identity and agency in emerging adulthood: Two development routes in the individualization process. Youth and Society, 2, 201–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwarzer, R. (2000). Manage stress at work through preventive and proactive coping. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior … (pp. 342–355). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  51. Skinner, E. A., & Zimmmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2007). The development of coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sohl, S. J., & Moyer, A. (2009). Refining the conceptualization of a future oriented self-regulatory behavior: Proactive coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (1997). Mental time travel and evolution of human mind. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 123, 133–167.Google Scholar
  54. Uskul, A. K., & Greenglass, E. (2005). Psychological well-being in a Turkish-Canadian sample. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 18, 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vecchio, G. M., Gerbino, M., Pastorelli, C., Del Bove, G., & Caprara, G. V. (2007). Multi-faceted self-beliefs as predictors of life satisfaction in late adolescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1087–1818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zambianchi, M., Ricci Bitti, P. E., & Gremigni, P. (2010). Prospettiva temporale, pianificazione dell’agenda personale e adozione di comportamenti a rischio in adolescenza [Time perspective, personal agenda, and adoption of risk behaviours in adolescence]. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo [Clinical Psychology of Development], 2, 395–412.Google Scholar
  57. Zambianchi, M., & Ricci Bitti, P. E. (2008). Promuovere il benessere sociale in adolescenza: influenza dei fattori individuali e familiari sul senso di comunità [Individual and family factors influencing sense of community in adolescence]. Psicologia della Salute [Health Psychology], 2, 43–61.Google Scholar
  58. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable, individual differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1271–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(6), 1007–1023.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.University of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations