The Hedonic and Eudaimonic Validity of the Orientations to Happiness Scale
- 1.6k Downloads
The orientations to happiness scale (OTH) was designed to measure three routes to happiness: pleasure (hedonia), meaning (eudaimonia) and engagement (flow). Past research utilising the scale suggests that all orientations predict life satisfaction, with meaning and engagement the stronger predictors relative to pleasure. However, these findings are inconsistent with other research; one plausible explanation being that the OTH scale lacks validity. This was tested by having participants (N = 107) complete the OTH scale and the Satisfaction with Life scale, prior to completing an online diary reporting actual instances of hedonic and eudaimonic behaviour. Although meaning predicted eudaimonic behaviour, the pleasure orientation was unrelated to hedonic behaviour. Further, hedonic behaviour was more strongly related to life satisfaction than eudaimonic behaviour; inconsistent with OTH scale results. These findings challenge the validity of the OTH scale, and subsequently bring into question those conclusions drawn from past research utilising the OTH scale.
KeywordsEudaimonia Hedonia Happiness Validity Well-being Orientations Pathways
- Aristotle. (1985). Nicomachean ethics (T. Irwin, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008). 2006 time use survey Canberra, Australian Capital Territory.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Good business: Leadership, flow, and the making of meaning. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
- Frankl, V. E. (1988). The will to meaning: Foundations and applications of logotherapy. In V. E. Frankl (Ed.), Meridian. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
- Huta, V. (2013). Eudaimonia. In S. David, I. Boniwell, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Happiness, Chap. 14. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Multinational Time Use Study. (2012). MTUS coding procedures. http://www.timeuse.org/mtus/data: Fisher, K.
- Vittersø, J., Dyrdal, G. M., & Røysamb, E. (2006). Why can’t we measure engagement with life satisfaction scales? Some theoretical and empirical arguments about their distinctiveness. Paper presented at the The 3rd European conference on positive psychology, Braga, Portugal.Google Scholar