Social Indicators Research

, Volume 115, Issue 3, pp 945–961 | Cite as

Users Beware: Variable Effects of Parenthood on Happiness Within and Across International Datasets

  • Matthew A. Andersson
  • Jennifer Glass
  • Robin W. Simon


Researchers have begun assessing differences in well-being among parents versus non-parents using a cross-national comparative approach. Given the availability of multiple major datasets, a systematic methodological study isolating the effects of data choice would be helpful. To accomplish this objective, we draw upon two major datasets (European Social Survey and International Social Survey Programme) and we devise and implement a uniquely controlled method on five fronts by holding time, outcome measurement, parenthood operationalization, geographic sampling, and set of covariates constant. Our design features four distinct observations for each of 11 European countries (two from the 2006 and 2008 ESS, two from the 2007 and 2008 ISSP; 44 cross sections, N = 57,539). Employing both fixed- and random-effects approaches, we demonstrate that choice of major dataset (ISSP or ESS) and choice between contemporaneous cross-sections both contribute strikingly to the estimates of parenthood on happiness. In fact, effect variances at the cross-sectional, dataset and country levels are all significant and are not statistically different. We conclude by discussing several limitations of our analyses and implications for parenthood researchers.


Happiness Parenthood Cross-national Reliability testing European social survey International social survey programme 


  1. Aassve, A., Goisis, A., & Sironi, M. (2012). Happiness and childbearing across Europe. Social Indicators Research, 108, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, R., & Chernova, K. (2008). Absolute income, relative income, and happiness. Social Indicators Research, 88, 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjornskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2008). Cross-country determinants of life satisfaction: Exploring different determinants across groups in society. Social Choice and Welfare, 30, 119–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. European Social Survey (2006 [ESS3-2006 edition 3.3] and 2008 [ESS4-2008 edition 4.0]), (Accessed 7 Feb 2012).
  5. Evenson, R., & Simon, R. (2005). Clarifying the relationship between parenthood and depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 358–3411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: An international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75, 169–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hansen, T. (2012). Parenthood and happiness: A review of folk theories versus empirical evidence. Social Indicators Research, 108, 29–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hori, M. (2010) Gender differences and cultural contexts: Psychological well-being in cross-national perspective. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
  9. Huijts, T., Kraaykamp, G., & Subramanian, S. V. (2011). Childlessness and psychological well-being in context: A multilevel study on 24 European Countries. European Sociological Review. Advance online access,. doi:10.1093/esr/jcr037.Google Scholar
  10. International Social Survey Programme (2007 wave). (Accessed 17 Sep 2011).
  11. International Social Survey Programme (2008 wave). (Accessed 17 Feb 2012).
  12. Margolis, R., & Myrskyla, M. (2011). A global perspective on happiness and fertility. Population and Development Review, 37, 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ono, Hiroshi & Kristen Schultz Lee (2012) “Welfare states and the redistribution of happiness.” Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Sociology, Texas A and M University.Google Scholar
  14. Pichler, F. (2006). Subjective quality of life of young Europeans: Feeling happy but who knows why? Social Indicators Research, 75, 419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Plagnol, A. C., & Huppert, F. A. (2010). Happy to help? Exploring the factors associated with variations in rates of volunteering across Europe. Social Indicators Research, 97, 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  17. Soons, J. P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-being differences in 30 Countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1141–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Umberson, D., Pudrovska, T., & Reczek, C. (2010). Parenthood, childlessness, and well-being: A life course perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 612–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vanassche, S., Swicegood, G., & Matthijs, K. (2012). Marriage and children as a key to happiness? Cross-national differences in the effects of marital status and children on well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies. Advance online access,. doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9340-8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew A. Andersson
    • 1
  • Jennifer Glass
    • 2
  • Robin W. Simon
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe University of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  3. 3.Wake Forest UniversityWake ForestUSA

Personalised recommendations