Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 115, Issue 1, pp 493–508 | Cite as

The Impact of Democracy on Well-being

  • Marta Orviska
  • Anetta Caplanova
  • John HudsonEmail author
Article

Abstract

Can governance impact directly on well-being? In this paper we examine subjective well-being using data for a cross section of countries from the World Values data set. We find that regional democratic satisfaction impacts on both individual happiness and life satisfaction. However, the impact is less evident for women, rich people and for those in rich countries. The fact that the governance variable analysis is based on regional differences in democratic satisfaction reminds us that governance and indeed happiness often differs within countries as well as between them. The use of regional satisfaction in this manner helps overcome endogeneity problems which would be present if we were to use individual democratic satisfaction. Other significant determinants of happiness include settlement size, marital status, income, unemployment and being part of a linguistic minority/majority grouping.

Keywords

Democracy Happiness Regions 

References

  1. Alvarez-Diaz, A., Gonzalez, L., & Radcliff, B. (2010). The politics of happiness: on the political determinants of quality of life in the American states. Journal of Politics, 72, 894–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohnke, P. (2008). Does Society matter? Life satisfaction in the enlarged Europe. Social Indicators Research, 87, 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonini, A. N. (2008). Cross-national variation in individual life satisfaction: Effects of national wealth, human development, and environmental conditions. Social Indicators Research, 87, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economics Behavior and Organization, 65, 506–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caporale, G. M., Georgellis, Y., Tsitsianis, N., & Yin, Y. P. (2009). Income and happiness across Europe: Do reference values matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. Economic Journal, 104, 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, A. E., Oswald, A. J., & Warr, P. (1996). Is job satisfaction U-shaped in age? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cullis, J., Hudson, J., & Jones, P. (2011). A different rationale for redistribution: Pursuit of happiness in the European Union. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 323–341.Google Scholar
  9. Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health and well being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives., 22, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, J., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence of surveys of happiness. American Economic Review, 91, 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, J., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 809–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E. M., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 31, 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being, Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.Google Scholar
  14. Dorn, D., Fischer, J. A. V., Kirchgassner, G., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2007). Is it culture or democracy? The impact of democracy and culture on happiness, Social Indicators Research, 82, 505–526.Google Scholar
  15. Dorn, D., Fischer, J. A. V., Kirchgassner, G., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2008). Direct democracy and life satisfaction revisited: New evidence for Switzerland. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fahey, T., & Smyth, E. (2004). Do subjective indicators measure welfare? Evidence from 33 European societies. European Societies, 6, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferriss, A. L. (2002). Religion and the quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fiorina, M. P. (1976). The voting decision: Instrumental decision and expressive aspects. Journal of Politics, 21, 601–625.Google Scholar
  20. Fosu, A., Bates, R., & Hoeffler, A. (2006). Institutions, governance and economic development in Africa: An overview. Journal of African Economies, 15(Supplement 1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002a). Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Human Well-Being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002b). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gitmex, A. S., & Morcol, G. (1994). Socio-economic status and life satisfaction in Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 31, 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, C., & Pettinatio, S. (2001). Happiness, markets, and democracy: Latin America in comparative perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 237–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Alfred Marshall lecture—Social capital as good culture. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6, 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayo, B., & Seifert, W. (2003). Subjective well-being in Eastern Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Helliwell, J. F., & Huang, H. F. (2008). How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 595–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Henderson, J. (1985). Economic theory and the cities. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hudson, J. (2006). Institutional trust and subjective well being across the EU. Kyklos, 59, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Inglehart, R. F. (1999). Trust, well-being and democracy. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 88–120). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H. (2000). Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 165–183). Cambridge, London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwartz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: The foundation of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  35. Layard, R. (2006). Happiness and Public Policy: A challenge to the profession. Economic Journal, 116, C24–C33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Namazie, C., & Sanfey, P. (2001). Happiness in transition: The case of Kyrgyzstan. Review of Development Economics, 5, 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Owen, A. L., Videras, J., & Willemsen, C. (2008). Democracy, participation, and life satisfaction. Social Science Quarterly, 89, 987–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pittau, M. G., Zelli, R., & Gelman, A. (2010). Economic disparities and life satisfaction in European regions. Social Indicators Research, 96, 339–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Royuela, V., & Surinach, J. (2005). Constituents of quality of life and urban size. Social Indicators Research, 74, 549–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sanfey, P., & Teksoz, U. (2007). Does transition make you happy? Economics of Transition, 15, 707–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schyns, P. (1998). Crossnational differences in happiness: Economic and cultural factors explored. Social Indicators Research, 43, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Selim, S. (2008). Life satisfaction and happiness in Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 87, 531–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Snoep, L. (2008). Religiousness and happiness in three nations: A research note. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tesch-Romer, C., Motel-Klingebiel, A., & Tomasik, M. J. (2008). Gender differences in subjective well-being: Comparing societies with respect to gender equality. Social Indicators Research, 85, 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tsou, M.-W., & Liu, J.-T. (2001). Happiness and domain satisfaction in Taiwan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Veenhoven, R. (2000). Freedom and happiness: A comparative study in forty-four nations in the early 1990s. In E. Diener & M. Eunkook (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 257–288). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Vermunt, R., Spaans, E., & Zorge, F. (1989). Satisfaction, happiness and subjective well-being of Dutch students. Social Indicators Research, 21, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wagner, M., Schneider, F., & Halla, A. (2009). The quality of institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe: A panel analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 25, 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Work, R. (2002). Overview of decentralisation worldwide: A stepping stone to improved governance and human development, paper presented at the 2nd International conference on decentralisation “Federalism: The future of decentralizing states?”, Organised by the UNDP, Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsMatej Bel UniversityBanska BystricaSlovak Republic
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Economics in BratislavaBratislavaSlovak Republic
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations