Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 115, Issue 1, pp 457–466 | Cite as

Validating the Portuguese Version of the Satisfaction With Life Scale in an Elderly Sample

  • Patricia Sancho
  • Laura Galiana
  • Melchor Gutierrez
  • Elizabeth-Hama Francisco
  • José M. TomásEmail author
Article

Abstract

Life satisfaction is referred to a cognitive, judgmental process (Diener et al. in J Pers Assess 49:71–75, 1985), in which person’s quality of life is globally assessed according to his/her chosen criteria (Shin and Johnson in Soc Indic res 5:475–492, 1978). Thus, life satisfaction is a conscious cognitive judgment, based on the comparison of one’s life with a self-imposed standard or set of standards, which lead to a global assessment of life (Pavot and Diener in Psychol Assess 5:164–172, 1993). Among the many scales developed to measure life satisfaction, the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS, Diener et al. in J Pers Assess 49:71–75, 1985) is one of the global life satisfaction scales more often used in the research arena. It is composed of five items assessing global life satisfaction, using a Likert type response format. The aim of this paper is to validate the Portuguese version of the SWLS via confirmatory factor analysis, with a sample of 1,003 elderly from Angola. Reliability, factorial and criterial validity estimates are presented. Overall, the results shown that the scale had an adequate one-factor confirmatory solution, satisfying reliability indices, and adequate criterion-related validity when assessed in a sample of Angolan elderly. The discussion relates the results with existing literature and posits the contributions of the paper: firstly, it offers the researchers on life satisfaction in Portuguese-speaking contexts a brief, self-rated measure of satisfaction with life that has sound psychometric properties, validity, and reliability; secondly, it is the first confirmatory validation of the scale in Portuguese.

Keywords

Satisfaction With Life Scale Reliability Validity Confirmatory factor analysis Elderly 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research in this paper is partially funded by a grant from the Spanish Government (project PSI2010-21334). Laura Galiana is beneficiary of a grant from the University of Valencia (V Segles, VCL/Campus Program).

References

  1. Andrews, F. M. (1974). Social indicators of perceived life quality. Social Indicators Research, 1, 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America’s perception of life quality. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrindell, W. A., Meeuwesen, L., & Huyse, F. J. (1991). The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties in a non-psychiatric medical outpatients sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrindell, W. A., Heesink, J., & Feij, J. A. (1999). The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 health young adults in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 815–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atienza, F. L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (2000). Psychometric properties of satisfaction with life scale in adolescents [Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de satisfacción con la vida en adolescentes]. Psicothema, 12, 331–336.Google Scholar
  6. Beiser, M. (1974). Components and correlates of mental well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 15, 320–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bigot, A. (1974). The relevance of American life satisfaction indices for research on British subjects before and after retirement. Age and Ageing, 2, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blais, M. R., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Briere, N. M. (1989). The satisfaction with life scale: Cannadian-French validation of the satisfaction with life scale [L’Echelle de satisfaction de vie: validation Canadienne-Francaise du “satisfaction with life scale”]. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 21, 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cabañero, M. J., Richart, M., Cabrero, J., Orts, M. I., Reig, A., & Tosal, B. (2004). Reliability and validity of Diener’s satisfaction with life scale in a simple of pregnant and puerperal women [Fiabilidad y validez de la escala de satisfacción vital de Diener en una muestra de mujeres embarazadas y puérperas]. Psicothema, 16, 448–455.Google Scholar
  11. DeHaes, J. C., Pennink, B. J. W., & Welvaart, K. (1987). The distinction between affect and cognition. Social Indicators Research, 19, 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E. (2009). SWLS Translations. University of Illinois at Urbana Champagne. Retrieved on January, 30th, 2011: http://s.psych.uiuc.edu/~ediener/SWLS.html.
  14. Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425. Google Scholar
  17. Eizenman, D. R., Nesselroade, J. R., Featherman, D. L., & Rowe, J. W. (1997). Intraindividual variability in perceived control in an older sample: The MacArthur successful aging studies. Psychology and Aging, 12, 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fernández-Ballesteros, R., Zamarrón, M. D., & Maciá, A. (1996). Quality of life in aging in different contexts [Calidad de vida en la vejez en distintos contextos]. Madrid: IMSERSO.Google Scholar
  19. Fernández-Ballesteros, R., Zamarrón, M. D., & Ruíz, M. A. (2001). The contribution to socio-demographic and psychosocial factors to life satisfaction. Aging and Society, 21, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harrington, R., & Loffredo, D. A. (2001). The relationships between life satisfaction, self-consciousness, and the Myers-Briggs type inventory dimensions. Journal of Psychology, 135, 439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Infurna, F. J., Ram, N., Wagner, G. G., Gerstorf, D., & Schupp, J. (2011). Long-term antecedents and outcomes of perceived control. Psychology and Aging, 26, 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Joy, R. H. (1990). Path analytic investigation of stress-symptoms relationships: Physical and psychological symptom models. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  25. Kafka, G. J., & Kozma, A. (2002). The construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being (SPWB) and their relationship to measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 57, 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  27. Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laranjeira, C. A. (2009). Preliminary validation study of the Portuguese version of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychology, Health, & Medicine, 14, 220–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawton, M. P. (1975). The Philadelphia center morale scale, a revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewis, C. A., Shevlin, M. E., Bunting, B. P., & Joseph, S. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the satisfaction with life scale: Replication and methodological refinement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 304–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis, C. A., Shevlin, M. E., Smekal, V., & Dorahy, M. J. (1999). Factor structure and reliability of a Czech translation of the satisfaction with life scale among Czech university students. Studia Psychologica, 41, 239–244.Google Scholar
  32. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 71, 3616–3628.Google Scholar
  33. McAdams, D. P., Aubin, E. S., & Logan, L. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McGarrahan, J. F. (1991). Family of the origin, antecedents of religious vocation, community experience, and the satisfaction of active and contemplative religious women. Temple University: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  35. Millsap, R. E. (1995). The statistical analysis of method effects in multitrait-multimethod data: A review. In P. E. Shrout & T. Fiske (Eds.), Personality research, methods and theory: A festchrift honoring Donald W. Fiske. Hillslade, NJ: Lawrence Erlbraum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pavot, w., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvick, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being. Social Indicators Research, 28, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pons, D., Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (2002). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale in the elderly [Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de satisfacción con la vida en personas de la tercera edad]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 13, 71–82.Google Scholar
  40. Requena, C., López, V., González, R., & Ortiz, T. (2009). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale in active older women [Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de satisfacción con la vida en mujeres mayores activas]. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 44, 146–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmitt, N., & Stults, D. M. (1986). Methodology review: Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Senecal, C., Nouwen, A., & White, D. (2000). Motivation and dietary self-care in adults with diabetes: Are self-efficacy and autonomous self-regulation complementary or competing constructs? Health Psychology, 19, 452–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaw, B. A., Krause, N., Chatters, L. M., Connell, C. M., & Ingersoll-Dayton, B. (2004). Emotional support from parents early in life, aging and health. Psychology and Aging, 19, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shevlin, M. E., & Bunting, B. P. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis of the satisfaction with life scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1316–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shevlin, M., Brunsden, V., & Miles, J. N. V. (1998). Satisfaction with life scale: Analysis of factorial invariance, mean structures and reliability. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 911–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shin, D. C., & Johnson, D. M. (1978). A vowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smead, V. S. (1991). Measuring well-being is not easy. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology.Google Scholar
  48. Steiger, J. H., & Lind, C. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.Google Scholar
  49. Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen (Ed.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10–39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Theurer, K., & Wister, A. (2010). Altruistic behavior and social capital as predictors of well-being among older Canadians. Aging & Society, 30, 157–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ullman, J. B. (1996). Structural equation modeling. In B. Tabachnick & L. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (pp. 709–812). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  52. Vitaliano, P. P., Russo, J., Young, H. M., Becker, J., & Maiuro, R. D. (1991). The screen for caregiver burden. The Gerontologist, 31, 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wothke, W. (1996). Models for multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Sancho
    • 1
  • Laura Galiana
    • 1
  • Melchor Gutierrez
    • 2
  • Elizabeth-Hama Francisco
    • 3
  • José M. Tomás
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Methodology for the Behavioural Sciences, Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Educational SciencesInstituto Superior de Ciências da EducaçãoLuandaAngola

Personalised recommendations