Social Indicators Research

, Volume 115, Issue 1, pp 441–456 | Cite as

What Defines Quality of Life? The Gap Between Public Policies and Locally Defined Indicators Among Residents of Kodagu, Karnataka (India)

  • Francisco Zorondo-Rodríguez
  • Erik Gómez-Baggethun
  • Kathryn Demps
  • Pere Ariza-Montobbio
  • Claude García
  • Victoria Reyes-García
Article

Abstract

Improving quality of life (QoL) is one of the main goals of many public policies. A useful tool to measure QoL needs to get a good balance between indicators guided by theories (top-down approach) and indicators defined by local people (bottom-up approach). However, QoL measurement tools often neglect to include elements that define the standard of living at local level. In this paper, we analyse the correspondence between human development index, as an indicator adopted by governments to assess QoL, and the elements defined by local people as important in their QoL, called here local means. Using a free-listing technique, we collected information from 114 individuals from Kodagu, Kartanataka (India), to capture local means defining QoL. We then compared local means with the indicators used by Human development report (HDR) of Karnataka, the main measurement tool of QoL in Kodagu. The list of local means included access to basic facilities and many issues related to agriculture and natural resources management as elements locally defining QoL. We also found that HDR does not capture the means defined by people as indicators of QoL. Our findings suggest an important gap between current QoL’s indicators considered by public policies and the means of QoL defined by people. Our study provides insights for a set of plausible local indicators useful to achieve a balance between top-down and bottom-up approaches for the local public policies.

Keywords

Quality of life Human well-being Local means Human development index Kodagu India 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by NSF- Cultural Anthropology Program (BSC-0726612) and ANR-French National Research Agency Project (ANR-05-PADD-0XX Public Policies and Traditional Management of Trees and Forests -POPULAR). We greatly appreciate the hospitality, kindness, and friendship of people from Kodagu. We are also grateful to P. Vaast, K.T. Vaast, and C.G. Kushalappa. Thanks to Sumanth and Govind for help with translations. F. Zorondo-Rodríguez thanks the economic support provided by the "Presidente de la República" scholarship (CONICYT, Chile). We appreciate the comments and editing support by H. Leach, A. Luz, D. Calvo, and M. Aguado. We thank the Forest Department of Karnataka (India) for providing the permits to conduct this research.

References

  1. Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30, 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bawa, K. S., Joseph, G., & Setty, S. (2007). Poverty, biodiversity and institutions in forest-agriculture ecotones in the Western Ghats and Eastern Himalaya Ranges of India. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 121, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernard, H. R. (2005). Research methods in anthropology. Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Walnut Creek: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
  4. Bhagwat, S. A., Kushalappa, C. G., Williams, P. H., & Brown, N. D. (2005). Landscape approach to biodiversity conservation of sacred groves in the Western Ghats of India. Conservation Biology, 19, 1853–1862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., et al. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61, 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeLugan, R. M., Hernandez, M. D., Sylvester, D. E., & WefferThe, S. E. (2011). Dynamics of social indicator research for California’s central valley in transition. Social Indicators Research, 100, 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demps, K., Zorondo-Rodríguez, F., García, C., & Reyes-García, V. (in press). Social learning across the lifecycle: Cultural knowledge acquisition for honey hunting among the Jenu Kuruba, India. Evolution and Human Behavior.Google Scholar
  8. Deshpande, R. V. (2005). Adolescent fertility in Karnataka: An analysis using RHS-RCH data. The Indian Journal of Family Welfare, 51(1), 38–39.Google Scholar
  9. Dluhy, M., & Swatrz, N. (2006). Connecting knowledge and policy: The promise of community indicators in the United States. Social Indicators Research, 79, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dodds, S. (1997). Towards a “science of sustainability”: Improving the way ecological economics understands human well-being. Ecological Economics, 23, 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frønes, I. (2007). Theorizing indicators: On indicators, signs and trends. Social Indicators Research, 83, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. García, C. A., Bhagwat, S. A., Ghazoul, J., Nath, C. D., Nanaya, K. M., Kushalappa, C. G., et al. (2010). Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes: Challenges and opportunities of coffee agroforests in the Western Ghats, India. Conservation Biology, 24, 479–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. García, C. A., & Lescuyer, G. (2008). Monitoring, indicators and community based forest management in the tropics: Pretexts or red herrings? Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 1303–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Government of Karnataka. (2006). Human development report in Karnataka 2005. Planning and Statistics Department, Government of Karnataka, Bangalore.Google Scholar
  15. Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, A. R., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Handwerker, W. P., & Wozniak, D. F. (1997). Sampling strategies for the collection of cultural data. Current Anthropology, 38, 869–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kshirsagar, R. D., & Singh, N. P. (2001). Some less known ethnomedicinal uses from Mysore and Coorg districts, Karnataka state, India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 75, 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Macura, B., Zorondo-Rodríguez, F., Grau-Satorras, M., Demps, K., Laval, M., Garcia, C. A., et al. (2011). Local community attitudes toward forests outside protected areas in India. Impact of legal awareness, trust, and participation. Ecology and Society, 16(3), 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malkina-Pykh, I. G., & Pykh, Y. A. (2008). Quality-of-life indicators at different scales: Theoretical background. Ecological Indicators, 6, 854–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Masferrer-Dodas, E., Rico-Amado, L., Tomás Huanta, TAPS Bolivian Study Team, & Reyes-García, V. (2011). Consumption of market goods and well-being in small-scale societies: An empirical test among the Tsimane’ in the Bolivian Amazon. Ecological Economics. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.009.
  21. Max-Neef, M., Elizalde, A. and Hopenhayn, M. (1993). Desarrollo a Escala humana. Conceptos, aplicaciones y algunas reflexiones. Barcelona, Spain: Editorial Icària.Google Scholar
  22. McMhom, S. K. (2002). The development of quality of life indicators—a case study from the city of Bristol, UK. Ecological Indicators, 2, 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  24. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. Washington: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Puri, R. K. (2011). Documenting local environmental knowledge and change. In H. Newing, C. Eagle, R. K. Puri, & C. W. Watson (Eds.), Conducting research in conservation: A social science perspective (pp. 146–169). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Rahman, T., Mittelhammer, R. C., & Wandschneider, P. R. (2011). Measuring quality of life across countries: A multiple indicators and multiple causes approach. Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Revised ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sirgy, M. J. (2011). Theoretical perspectives guiding QOL indicator projects. Social Indicators Research, 103, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Somarriba, N., & Pena, B. (2009). Synthetic indicators of quality of life in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 94, 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Swain, D., & Hollar, D. (2003). Measuring progress: Community indicators and the quality of life. International Journal of Public Administration, 26, 789–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco Zorondo-Rodríguez
    • 1
    • 2
  • Erik Gómez-Baggethun
    • 1
    • 3
  • Kathryn Demps
    • 2
    • 4
  • Pere Ariza-Montobbio
    • 1
  • Claude García
    • 2
    • 5
  • Victoria Reyes-García
    • 2
    • 6
  1. 1.Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia AmbientalsUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain
  2. 2.Ecology DepartmentFrench Institute of PondicherryPondicherryIndia
  3. 3.Social-Ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of EcologyAutonomous University of MadridMadridSpain
  4. 4.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  5. 5.CIRADRessources forestières et politiques publiquesMontpellierFrance
  6. 6.ICREA and Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia AmbientalsUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain

Personalised recommendations