Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 114, Issue 3, pp 1225–1242 | Cite as

Is Social Capital a Good Concept?

  • Christian Bjørnskov
  • Kim Mannemar Sønderskov
Article

Abstract

This paper explores whether the concept of social capital as popularized by Robert Putnam is a good social science concept. Taking Gerring’s work on concept evaluation as the starting point, the paper first presents a set of criteria for conceptual ‘goodness’ and discusses how social capital performs on these criteria. It is argued that social capital eventually may be a good concept if it can be shown empirically to be a unidimensional concept. An empirical section therefore explores the validity of the unidimensionality assumption and rejects it in four separate tests at both the individual and aggregate level. We conclude that even if social capital has been a remarkably productive idea, it is not a good concept as most popular conceptualizations define social capital as several distinct phenomena or as phenomena that already have been conceptualized under other labels.

Keywords

Social capital Principal components analysis Concept formation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for comments on previous versions from anonymous referees, Niclas Berggren, Jørgen Møller, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Richard Traunmüller, Eric Uslaner, and participants at a CINEFOGO conference in Aalborg, Denmark, June 2009. All remaining errors are of course ours.

References

  1. Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., & Guiliano, P. (2011). Family ties and political participation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, 817–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K. (1972). Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1, 343–367.Google Scholar
  4. Arrow, K. (2000). Observations on social capital. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 3–5). Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  5. Berggren, N., Jordahl, H., & Elinder, M. (2008). Trust and growth: A shaky relation. Empirical Economics, 35, 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beugelsdijk, S., de Groot, H. L. F., & van Schaik, A. B. T. M. (2004). Trust and economic growth: A robustness analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjørnskov, C. (2003). The happy few. Cross-country evidence on social capital and life satisfaction. Kyklos, 56, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bjørnskov, C. (2006). The multiple facets of social capital. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bjørnskov, C. (2008). Social capital and happiness in the United States. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 3, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. 2002. Social capital and community governance. The Economic Journal, 112(483), F419–F436.Google Scholar
  12. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Durlauf, S. N. (2002a). Bowling alone: A review essay. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 47, 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Durlauf, S. N. (2002b). On the empirics of social capital. The Economic Journal, 112, 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Durlauf, S.N., & Fafchamps, M. (2004). Social capital. NBER Working Papers 10485. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  18. Fehr, E., & Schneider, F. (2010). Eyes are on us, but nobody cares: are eye cues relevant for strong reciprocity? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1686), 1315–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fine, B. (2001). Social capital versus social theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Fischer, C. S. (2005). Bowling alone: What’s the score? Social Networks, 27(2), 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fukuyama, F. (1997). Social capital. Tanner lecture on human values. Oxford: Brasenose College.Google Scholar
  22. Gerring, J. (1999). What makes a concept good? A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences. Polity, 31(3), 357–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gerring, J. (2001). Social science methodology: A criterial framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gerring, J. (2012). Social science methodology: A criterial framework (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Grafton, R. Q., & Knowles, S. (2004). Social capital and national environmental performance: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Environment & Development, 13(4), 336–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Groot, W., van den Brink, H. M., & van Praag, B. (2006). The compensating income variation of social capital. IZA Working Paper 2529, IZA: Bonn.Google Scholar
  27. Grootaert, C., & van Bastelaer, T. (2002). Understanding and measuring social capital: A multi-disciplinary tool for practitioners. Washington, D.C: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guinnane, T. (2005). Trust: A concept too many. Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte, 1, 77–92.Google Scholar
  29. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20, 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. (1995). Economic growth and social capital in Italy. Eastern Economic Journal, 221, 295–307.Google Scholar
  31. Inglehart, R., Basañez, M., Díez-Medrano, J., Halman, L., & Luijkx, R. (2004). Human beliefs and values. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  32. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2004). What insights can multi-country surveys provide about people and societies? Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section in Comparative Politics, 15(2), 14–18.Google Scholar
  33. Knack, S. (2002). Social capital and the quality of government: Evidence from the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 772–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic pay-off? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knowles, S. (2006). Is social capital part of the institutions continuum and is it a deep determinant of development? Research Paper 25, World Institute for Development Economics Research.Google Scholar
  36. Kramarz, F., & Thesmar, D. (2006). Social networks in the boardroom. IZA Discussion Paper 1940.Google Scholar
  37. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lakatos, I. (1977). The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical Papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Manski, C. (2000). Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McNamara, J. M., Stephens, P. A., Dall, S. R. X., & Houston, A. I. (2009). Evolution of trust and trustworthiness: social awareness favours personality differences. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1657), 605–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Narayan, D. & Pritchett, L. (1999). Cents and Sociability: Household income and social capital in rural Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47(4), 871–897.Google Scholar
  43. Ostrom, E. (2000). Social capital: A fad or a fundamental concept. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 172–214). Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  44. Paldam, M. (2000). Social capital: One or many? Definition and measurement. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14, 629–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pargal, S., Gilligan, D. O., & Huq, M. (2002). Does social capital increase participation in voluntary solid waste management? Evidence from Dhaka, Bangladesh. In C. Grootaert & T. van Bastelaer (Eds.), The role of social capital in development (pp. 188–209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 88–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  51. Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15(3), 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64, 1033–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwartz, S. (1994). The fallacy of the ecological fallacy: The potential misuse of a concept and consequences. American Journal of Public Health, 84(5), 819–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seligson, M. A. (2002). The renaissance of political culture or the renaissance of the ecological fallacy? Comparative Politics, 34(3), 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, S. S., & Kulynych, J. (2002). It may be social, but why is it capital? The social construction of social capital and the politics of language. Politics & Society, 30(1), 149–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sobel, J. (2002). Can we trust social capital? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(1), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Solow, R. M. (2000). Notes on social capital and economic performance. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 6–10). Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  58. Sønderskov, K. M. (2009). The environment. In G. T. Svendsen & G. L. H. Svendsen (Eds.), Handbook of social capital: The troika of sociology, political science and economics (pp. 252–271). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  59. Stolle, D. (2001). Getting to trust. An analysis of the importance of institutions, families, personal experiences and group membership. In P. Dekker & E. M. Uslaner (Eds.), Social capital and participation in everyday life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Whiteley, P. (2000). Economic growth and social capital. Political Studies, 48, 443–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Woolcock, M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 11–17.Google Scholar
  63. World Bank. (2005). Social capital home page. Available at http://wwwl.worldbank.org/prem/poverty/scapital/index.htm. Accessed May 2010.
  64. Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal, 111, 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Bjørnskov
    • 1
  • Kim Mannemar Sønderskov
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Economics and BusinessAarhus UniversityAarhus VDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Political Science and GovernmentAarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations