Cross-Cultural Difference in Subjective Wellbeing: Cultural Response Bias as an Explanation
This study investigates whether the Australian-Chinese differences in subjective wellbeing (SWB) can be attributed to cultural response bias (CRB) caused by the influence of Chinese culture. Four samples are compared: Australians, first generation Chinese immigrants, second generation Chinese immigrants, and Hong Kong Chinese. It is hypothesized that the effects of CRB on means scores and variance will be the highest for Hong Kong Chinese, followed by Australian Chinese immigrants and second generation, and the lowest for Australians. These predictions were generally supported. Income is used as a covariate to test whether the predicted pattern of results remain unchanged. The result was affirmative. CRB is thus verified as contributing to the SWB difference between the Australians and Hong Kong Chinese. The implications of these findings are discussed.
KeywordsCultural response bias Subjective wellbeing Personal wellbeing index Life domains Life satisfaction as a whole
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). 2006 Census of population and housing. Australia: Commonwealth Government of Australia.Google Scholar
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfaction. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Census and Statistics Department. (2006). 2006 population by-census-summary results. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer.Google Scholar
- Collins, J. (1993). Immigrant families in Australia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 24, 291–313.Google Scholar
- Crissman, L. W. (1991). Chinese immigrant families in Australia: A variety of experiences. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 22, 25–37.Google Scholar
- Cummins, R. A. (2012). Cultural response bias. In K. D. Keith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology. New York: Wiley (in press).Google Scholar
- Cummins, R. A., Collard, J., Woerner, J., Weinberg, M., Lorbergs, M., & Perera, C. (2009). Australian unity wellbeing index: Report 20.0. The wellbeing of Australians-who makes the decisions, health/wealth control, financial advice, and handedness. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. Retrieved August 31, 2010, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm.
- Cummins, R. A., Gullone, E., & Lau, A. L. D. (2002). A model of subjective wellbeing homeostasis: The role of personality. The Universality of Subjective Wellbeing Indicators, pp 7–46.Google Scholar
- Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Tomyn, A., Gibson, A., & Knapp, T’M. (2007). Australian unity wellbeing index: Report 17.0. The wellbeing of Australians-work, wealth and happiness. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. Retrieved August 31, 2007, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm.
- Goldberger, I., & Shlomo, S. (1982). Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal wellbeing index-adult (PWI-A). Retrieved on 11 January, 2010, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm.
- Kuo, W. (1976). Theories on migration and mental health: An empirical testing on Chinese-Americans. Social Sciences and Medicine, 10, 297–306.Google Scholar
- Lai, L. C. H. (2006). A study on the relationship between job satisfaction and partner satisfaction with subjective well-being. Thesis. Melbourne: Deakin University.Google Scholar
- Lai, L. C. H., & Cummins, R. A. (2010). Religiosity and subjective wellbeing in Christianity, Buddhism and Taoism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Melbourne: Deakin University.Google Scholar
- Tien, H. Y. (1966). The convict settlers of Australia/settlers of the Latrobe Valley: A sociological study of immigrants in the Brown Coal Industry in Australia. Sociological Review, 31, 558–560.Google Scholar
- Wong, P. S. (1993). Satisfaction with life. In S. K. Lau, M. K. Lee, P. S. Wan, & S. L. Wong (Eds.), Indicators of social development (pp. 399–438). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies.Google Scholar