Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 243–253 | Cite as

Causal Ordering of Basic Psychological Needs and Well-Being

  • Jaime LeónEmail author
  • Juan L. Núñez
Article

Abstract

What is the relationship between well-being and satisfaction of basic psychological needs overtime? The basic psychological needs theory is a subtheory of the self-determination theory that elaborates the concept of psychological needs and its relations to psychological health and well-being. The goals of this research was to establish the causal ordering between basic psychological needs and three psychological well-being indicators (subjective well-being, self-esteem and satisfaction with life), in a longitudinal study. We used a cross-lagged two-wave design. A total of 272 university students completed the questionnaire at the beginning and at the end of the semester. Relatedness at time 1 (T1) had a positive and significant effect on all well-being indicators at time 2 (T2); competence (T1) had a positive and significant effect on all indicators except for self-esteem (T2); finally, autonomy (T1) did not have a significant effect on any of the well-being indicators (T2). In conclusion, we confirm the causal ordering of competence and relatedness on well-being, according to the basic psychological needs subtheory. Universities, in general, and teachers, in particular, should promote relations between students and support the need of competence.

Keywords

Self-determination theory Basic psychological needs Cross-lagged Well-being Life satisfaction Self-esteem Vitality 

References

  1. Balaguer, I., Castillo, I., García-Merita, M., & Mars, L. (2005, July). Implications of structured extracurricular activities on adolescent’s well-being and risk behaviours: Motivational mechanisms. 9th European Congress of Psychology. Granada.Google Scholar
  2. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103–115. doi: 10.1007/BF01207052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.125.2.276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elosua, P., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Reliability coefficients for ordinal response scales. Psicothema, 20, 896–901.Google Scholar
  10. Fox, K. R. (1997). The physical self and processes in self-esteem development. In K. R. Fox (Ed.), The physical self: From motivation to well-being (pp. 111–139). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  11. Fox, K. R. (2000). Self-esteem, self-perceptions and exercise. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 31, 228–240.Google Scholar
  12. Gillet, N., Rosnet, E., & Vallerand, R. J. (2008). Développement d’une échelle de satisfaction des besoins fondamentaux en contexte sportif. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 40(4), 230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the self-perception profile for children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.Google Scholar
  14. Lavigne, G. L., Vallerand, R. J., & Crevier-Braud, L. (2011). The fundamental need to belong: On the distinction between growth and deficit-reduction orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(9), 1185–1201. doi: 10.1177/0146167211405995.
  15. León, J., Domínguez, E., Núñez, J. L., Pérez, A., & Martín-Albo, J. (2011). Traducción y validación de la versión española de la Échelle de Satisfacción des Besoins Psychologiques en el contexto educativo. Anales de Psicología, 27(2), 405–411.Google Scholar
  16. MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–226. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marsh, H. W. (2002, August). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement. Paper presented at Self-concept Enhancement and Learning Facilitation (SELF) Research Centre International Conference. Sydney, Australia. Paper retrieved from http://www.self.ox.ac.uk/Conferences/2002_CD_Marsh1.pdf.
  18. Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Yeung, A. S. (1999). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and revised recommendations. Educational Psychologist, 34, 154–157. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3403_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martín-Albo, J., Núñez, J. L., Navarro, J. G., & Grijalvo, F. (2007). The Rosenberg self-esteem scale: Translation and validation in university students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 458–467.Google Scholar
  20. Martín-Albo, J., Núñez, L., Navarro, G., & Grijalvo, F. (2009). An explanatory motivational model of psychological well-being at the university. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 26(1), 41–50.Google Scholar
  21. Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muthen, B., & Muthen, L. (2011). Mplus user’s guide (6.1). Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
  23. Núñez, J. L., Martín-Albo, J., & Domínguez, E. (2010). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale in physical activity practitioners. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 19(2), 291–304.Google Scholar
  24. Patrick, H., Knee, C. R., Canevello, A., & Lonsbary, C. (2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 434–457. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being. Social Indicators Research, 28, 1–20. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 319–338. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). From ego depletion to vitality: Theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 702–717. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00098.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. M. (1997). On energy, personality and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. D., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 226–249. doi: 10.1177/027243169401400207.Google Scholar
  33. Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need-satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The Self-Concordance Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482–490. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sheldon, K. M., & Krieger, L. K. (2007). Understanding the negative effects of legal education on law students: A longitudinal test of self-determination theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 883–897. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zapf, D., Dormann, C., & Frese, M. (1996). Longitudinal studies in organizational stress research: A review of the literature with reference to methodological issues. Journal of Occupational Health, 1, 145–169. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.1.2.145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of Las Palmas de Gran CanariaLas Palmas de Gran CanariaSpain

Personalised recommendations