The Palliative Function of System Justification: Concurrent Benefits Versus Longer-Term Costs to Wellbeing
- 542 Downloads
We examined the extent to which system justification buffered the negative effect of retrospective experiences of active harm from general sources in society on life satisfaction during the same assessment period, and prospectively 1 year later. Results from a nationally representative sample indicated that the retrospective assessment of active harm and quality of life were uncorrelated for people who endorsed system justifying ideology (N = 6,518). Study 2 replicated the concurrent buffering effect of system justification on subjective wellbeing and demonstrated that the effect reversed over time. For people high in system justification beliefs, societal-level harm prospectively predicted lower life satisfaction 1 year later (N = 136 undergraduates). Perceiving the system as fair and legitimate in the face of harm from others in society has opposing short and longer-term effects on wellbeing. We argue that these opposing effects occur because although system justification trumps experiences of harm and buffers life satisfaction in the short-term; the resulting experience-belief conflict engenders a state of ideological dissonance that predicts negative psychological outcomes down the track.
KeywordsSystem justification Subjective wellbeing Life satisfaction Active harm
Collection of the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2009 (NZAVS-09) data analyzed in this paper was funded by University of Auckland FRDF (#3624435/9853) and ECREA (#3626075) grants awarded to Chris Sibley.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London, UK: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Godfrey, E. B. (2011). Motive vs. status: System justification, mental health and behavior among disadvantaged mothers and their children (manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
- Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., van der Toorn, J., Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). System justification: How do we know it’s motivated? In A. C. Kay, et al. (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 11). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Jost, J. T., Pietrzak, J., Liviatan, I., Mandisodza, A., & Napier, J. (2008). System justification as conscious and nonconscious goal pursuit. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Sengupta, N. K., Osborne, D., Houkamau, C. A., Hoverd, W. J., Wilson, M. S., West-Newman, T., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). Income and subjective wellbeing in New Zealand (manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
- Sibley, C. G., Luyten, N., Purnomo, M., Moberly, A., Wootton, L. W., Hammond, M. D., et al. (2011). The Mini-IPIP6: Validation and extension of a short measure of the Big-Six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40, 142–159.Google Scholar
- Statistics New Zealand. (2006). 2006 Census of populations and dwellings. Wellington, NZ: Statistics New Zealand.Google Scholar