Social Indicators Research

, Volume 112, Issue 3, pp 641–660 | Cite as

Social Exclusion and Its Causes in East Asian Societies: Evidences from SQSQ Survey Data

Article

Abstract

Using data from surveys on “social quality survey questionnaires”, carried out by the Asian Consortium for Social Quality between 2009 and 2011, this study investigates the causes of social exclusion in six Asian societies. About 6,460 questionnaires were completed and the analysis of the data reveals the features and the causes of social exclusion in these societies. The study concludes that the impact of social factors (maritual status, parental relations, and personal relations with local communities) on social exclusion is stronger than the political and economical factors (including class stratification and lack of financial resources). The findings indicate that the lack of social capitals is the most significant cause of social exclusion in these societies.

Keywords

Indicator Social exclusion Social inclusion Social quality East Asia 

References

  1. Abdallah, S., Thompson, S., Michaelson, J., Marks, N., Steuer, N., et al. (2009). The Happy Planet Index 20. London: New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Barry, B. (1998). Social isolation and the distribution of income. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, W., et al. (Eds.). (2001). Social quality: A new vision for Europe. The Hague/London/Boston: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  4. Berger-Schmitt, R., & Noll, H. H. (2000). Conceptual framework and structure of a European system of social indicators. EuReporting Working Paper No 9, Centre for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA), Mannheim.Google Scholar
  5. Burchardt, T., et al. (2002). Degrees of exclusion: Developing a dynamic, multidimensional measure. In J. Hills, et al. (Eds.), Understanding social exclusion (pp. 30–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Eurostat. (2000). European social statistics: Income, poverty and social exclusion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  7. Eurostat. (2010). Combating property and social exclusion: A statistical portrait of the European Union. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  8. Lawson, S. (2011). Sanitizing ethnicity: The creation of singapore’s apolitical culture. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 7(1), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lin, K. (2011). The prototype of social quality theory and the adaptability to East Asian societies. International Journal of Social Quality, 1(1), 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marks, N., Abdallah, S., Simms, A., & Thompson, S. (2006). The Happy Planet Index. London: New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Noll, H. H. (2002). Social indicators and quality of life research: Background, achievements and current trends. In G. Genov (Ed.), Advances in Sociological Knowledge over Half a Century (pp. 151–181). Paris: ISSC.Google Scholar
  12. Rodriguez, R., Warmerdam, J., & Triomphe, C. E. (Eds.) (2010). The Lisbon strategy 20002010. An analysis and evaluation of the methods used and results achieved. Brussels: European Parliament. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/studies.do?language=EN.
  13. Room, G. (2000). Social exclusion, solidarity and the challenge of globalization. International Journal of Social Welfare, 9(2), 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Saunders, P. (2003). Can social exclusion provide a new framework for measuring poverty? Discussion Paper 127, Sydney: SPRC.Google Scholar
  15. Scutella, R., et al. (2009). Measuring poverty and social exclusion in Australia: A proposed multidimensional framework for identifying socio-economic disadvantage. Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 4/09, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, available at: http://www.melbourneinstitute.com.
  16. SEU. (2001). Preventing social exclusion, report by the social exclusion unit. Available at: www.cabeint-office.gov.uk/seu/2001.
  17. Turner, J. (1997). The institutional order. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  18. UN. (2010). Analyzing and measuring social inclusion in a global context. New York: UN.Google Scholar
  19. UNDP. (2006). Poverty, unemployment and social exclusion. Croatia: UNDP. Available at: http://www.undp.hr/upload/file/104/52080/FILENAME/Poverty,%20Unemployment%20and%20Social%20Exclusion.pdf.
  20. Walker, A. (2011). Social quality and welfare system sustainability. International Journal of Social Quality, 1(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Walker, A., & Wigfield, A. (2004). The social inclusion component of social quality, ENIQ. Available at: www.socialquality.org/site/ima/Social-Inclusion-febr-2004.pdf.
  22. Whiteford, P. (2001). Understanding poverty and social exclusion: Situating Australia internationally. In R. Fincher & P. Saunders (Eds.), Creating unequal futures? Rethinking poverty, inequality and disadvantage (pp. 38–69). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Public AdministrationZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Nanjing University of Finance and EconomicsNanjingChina
  3. 3.School of International StudiesZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  4. 4.School of Social and Behavioural SciencesNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations