Social Indicators Research

, Volume 111, Issue 3, pp 725–751 | Cite as

The Paradox of Children and Life Satisfaction

  • Leonardo BecchettiEmail author
  • Elena Giachin Ricca
  • Alessandra Pelloni


Empirical analyses of the determinants of life satisfaction routinely include the number of children as one of the socio demographic controls, without explicitly considering that, for a given household income, more children imply a lower level of income per family member. The variable “number of children” then often attracts a negative or insignificant coefficient. Using data from the German Socio Economic Panel 1984–2007 we confirm that the sign of the coefficient for the variable “number of children in the household” is negative when introducing household income without correction for the number of members in a life satisfaction regression. On the contrary, when we equivalise income with the most commonly adopted equivalence scales, so eliminating the monetary cost of raising children, the impact of the variable is positive and significant when a high level of economies of scale is assumed. Our results however lead us to reject slope homogeneity as we find strong differences by gender and region. In particular, the positive effect of children on life satisfaction is stronger for males and East Germans. We interpret these subsample split results as driven by heterogeneous opportunity costs and cultural traits.


Life satisfaction Equivalence scales Children 


  1. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009–2042.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchflower, D. G. (2008). International evidence on well-being. IZA DP No. 3354.Google Scholar
  3. Bradbury, B. (2008). Time and the cost of children. Review of Income and Wealth, 54, 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burkhauser, R. V., Barbara, A. B., Mary, C. D., & Dean, R. L. (2001). The cross-national equivalent file: A product of comparative research. In I. Becker, N. Ott, & G. Rolf (Eds.), Soziale Sicherung In Einer Dynamischen Gesellschaft (pp. 354–376). Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlagi.Google Scholar
  5. Burkhauser, R. V., Timothy, M. S., & Joachim, M. (1996). Relative inequality and poverty in Germany and the United States using alternative equivalency scales. Review of Income and Wealth, 42(4), 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. Economic Journal, 118, 222–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Tella, R., Mac Culloch, R., & Oswald, A. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 809–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Easterlin, R. A. (2005). A puzzle for adaptive theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 56, 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Federal Statistical Office. (2009). Germany’s population by 2060: Results of the 12th cooedintated population projection. In Statistisches Bundesamt (Ed.), Wiesbaden (
  11. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grabka, M. M. (2008). Codebook for the $PEQUIV File 19842007 CNEF variables with extended income information for the SOEP. DIW Data Documentation No. 34.Google Scholar
  13. Hagenaars, A., de Vos, K., & Zaidi, M. A. (1994). Poverty statistics in the late 1980s: Research based on micro-data. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  14. Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Hahn, M. (2006). PanelWhiz: A menu-driven Stata/SE interface for accessing panel data. Mimeo.
  15. Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: An international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75, 169–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review, 94(2), 429–434.Google Scholar
  17. Merz, J., Gamer, T., Smeeding, T. M., Faik, J., & Johnson, D. (1993). Two scales, one methodology—expenditure based equivalence scales for the United States and Germany. Cross-National Studies in Aging Program Project Paper No. 8, All-University Gerontology Center, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
  18. Schoon, I., Hansson, L., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2005). Combining work and family life: Life satisfaction among married and divorced men and women in Estonia, Finland and the UK. European Psychologist, 10, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schwarze, J. (2003). Using panel data on income satisfaction to estimate the equivalence scale elasticity. Review of Income and Wealth, 49, 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith, K. (2003). Individual welfare in the Soviet Union. Social Indicators Research, 64, 75–105.Google Scholar
  21. Stanca, L. (2009). With or without you: Measuring the quality of relational life throughout the world. Journal of Socio—Economics, 38(5), 834–842.Google Scholar
  22. Van Praag, B. M. S. (2007). Perspectives from the happiness literature and the role of new instruments for policy analysis. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2568.Google Scholar
  23. Van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified, a satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2006). An almost integration-free approach to ordered response models. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2006-047/3.Google Scholar
  25. Van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wildman, J., & Jones, A. (2002). Is it absolute income or relative deprivation that leads to poor psychological well being? A test based on individual-level longitudinal data. UK: University of York: YSHE.Google Scholar
  27. Wilke, R. A. (2006). Semi-parametric estimation of consumption-based equivalence scales: The case of Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21(6), 781–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonardo Becchetti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elena Giachin Ricca
    • 1
  • Alessandra Pelloni
    • 1
  1. 1.Facoltà di Economia, Dipartimento di Economia e IstituzioniUniversità di Roma Tor VergataRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations