The Paradox of Children and Life Satisfaction
- 624 Downloads
Empirical analyses of the determinants of life satisfaction routinely include the number of children as one of the socio demographic controls, without explicitly considering that, for a given household income, more children imply a lower level of income per family member. The variable “number of children” then often attracts a negative or insignificant coefficient. Using data from the German Socio Economic Panel 1984–2007 we confirm that the sign of the coefficient for the variable “number of children in the household” is negative when introducing household income without correction for the number of members in a life satisfaction regression. On the contrary, when we equivalise income with the most commonly adopted equivalence scales, so eliminating the monetary cost of raising children, the impact of the variable is positive and significant when a high level of economies of scale is assumed. Our results however lead us to reject slope homogeneity as we find strong differences by gender and region. In particular, the positive effect of children on life satisfaction is stronger for males and East Germans. We interpret these subsample split results as driven by heterogeneous opportunity costs and cultural traits.
KeywordsLife satisfaction Equivalence scales Children
- Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009–2042.Google Scholar
- Blanchflower, D. G. (2008). International evidence on well-being. IZA DP No. 3354.Google Scholar
- Burkhauser, R. V., Barbara, A. B., Mary, C. D., & Dean, R. L. (2001). The cross-national equivalent file: A product of comparative research. In I. Becker, N. Ott, & G. Rolf (Eds.), Soziale Sicherung In Einer Dynamischen Gesellschaft (pp. 354–376). Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlagi.Google Scholar
- Federal Statistical Office. (2009). Germany’s population by 2060: Results of the 12th cooedintated population projection. In Statistisches Bundesamt (Ed.), Wiesbaden (http://www.destatis.de).
- Grabka, M. M. (2008). Codebook for the $PEQUIV File 1984–2007 CNEF variables with extended income information for the SOEP. DIW Data Documentation No. 34.Google Scholar
- Hagenaars, A., de Vos, K., & Zaidi, M. A. (1994). Poverty statistics in the late 1980s: Research based on micro-data. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
- Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Hahn, M. (2006). PanelWhiz: A menu-driven Stata/SE interface for accessing panel data. Mimeo. http://www.panelwhiz.eu.
- Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review, 94(2), 429–434.Google Scholar
- Merz, J., Gamer, T., Smeeding, T. M., Faik, J., & Johnson, D. (1993). Two scales, one methodology—expenditure based equivalence scales for the United States and Germany. Cross-National Studies in Aging Program Project Paper No. 8, All-University Gerontology Center, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
- Smith, K. (2003). Individual welfare in the Soviet Union. Social Indicators Research, 64, 75–105.Google Scholar
- Stanca, L. (2009). With or without you: Measuring the quality of relational life throughout the world. Journal of Socio—Economics, 38(5), 834–842.Google Scholar
- Van Praag, B. M. S. (2007). Perspectives from the happiness literature and the role of new instruments for policy analysis. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2568.Google Scholar
- Van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2006). An almost integration-free approach to ordered response models. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2006-047/3.Google Scholar
- Wildman, J., & Jones, A. (2002). Is it absolute income or relative deprivation that leads to poor psychological well being? A test based on individual-level longitudinal data. UK: University of York: YSHE.Google Scholar