Innovativeness and Subjective Well-Being
- 944 Downloads
What are the effects of innovativeness on well-being? This paper argues that research on subjective well-being has progressed to a point where measures of subjective well-being (or: happiness) can usefully be employed to assess the welfare effects of innovative change. Based on a discussion of the prospects and pitfalls associated with subjective well-being as welfare measure and benchmark of societal progress, an argument is put forward as to why these measures are particularly well-suited in the context of innovative change. Empirically well-founded and with an explicit dynamic foundation, theories of subjective well-being allow for a nuanced and comprehensive assessment of the effects that innovativeness has on a society. Two evaluation rules, the “life domain evaluation principle” and the “welfare dynamics principle” are suggested to guide such normative assessment.
KeywordsSubjective well-being Innovations Public policy Happiness
The author gratefully acknowledges funding under the FP7 framework of the European Union within the AEGIS project. I wish to thank Ulrich Witt as well as the participants of the various AEGIS meetings for helpful comments and suggestions. Errors are mine alone.
- Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40–47.Google Scholar
- Atkinson, A. B. (2001). The strange disappearance of welfare economics. Kyklos, 54(Fasc. 2/3), 193–206.Google Scholar
- Binder, M. (2010). Elements of an evolutionary theory of welfare. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Binder, M., & Broekel, T. (2011). Happiness no matter the cost? An examination on how efficiently individuals reach their happiness levels. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9283-5.
- Binder, M., & Witt, U. (2011). As innovations drive economic growth, do they also raise well-being? Papers on Economics and Evolution, 1105.Google Scholar
- Binder, M., & Coad, A. (2011b). ‘I’m afraid I have bad news for you...’ Estimating the impact of different health impairments on subjective well-being. Papers on Economics and Evolution, 1115.Google Scholar
- Binder, M., & Coad, A. (2012). Life satisfaction and self-employment: A matching approach. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-011-9413-9.
- Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (Chap. 11, pp.213–229). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Dolan, P., Layard, R., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective well-being for public policy: Recommendations on measures. Special Paper No. 23, Centre for Economic Performance. Available at http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/special/cepsp23.pdf.
- Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. David, & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). New York/London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002a). Happiness and economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Graham, C. (2009). Happiness around the world. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Graham, C. (2011). The pursuit of happiness. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Graham, C., Eggers, A., & Sukhtankar, S. (2004). Does happiness pay? An exploration based on panel data from Russia. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55, 319–342.Google Scholar
- Graham, C., & Felton, A. (2005). Variance in obesity across cohorts and countries: A norms-based explanation using happiness surveys (September 2005). CSED Working Paper No. 42. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1024823.
- Graham, C., Chattopadhyay, S., & Picon, M. (2010). Adapting to adversity: Happiness and the 2009 economic crisis in the United States. Social Research, 77(2), 715–748.Google Scholar
- Gruber, J. H., & Mullainathan, S. (2005). Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier? BE Journal of Economic Policy Analysis, 5(1), 1–43.Google Scholar
- Layard, R. (2005). Happiness—Lessons from a new science. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
- Loewenstein, G. F., & Schkade, D. (1999). Wouldn’t it be nice? Predicting future feelings. D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (Chap. 5, pp. 85–105). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Mokyr, J. (1990). The lever of riches—Technological creativity and economic progress. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Myers, D. G. (1999). Close relationships and quality of life. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 374–391). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- NEF. (2009). Happy planet index 2.0. London: New Economics Foundation. Available at http://www.happyplanetindex.org.
- Nelson, R. R. (Ed.) (1993). National systems of innovation: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Nelson, R. R. (1996). The sources of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- North, D. C. (1999). Hayek’s contribution to understanding the process of economic change. In V. J. Vanberg (Ed.), Freiheit, Wettbewerb und Wirtschaftsordnung (pp. 79–96). Freiburg: Haufe.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, N. (1996). Uncertainty and technological change. In Federal reserve bank of Boston conference proceedings (pp. 91–125).Google Scholar
- Schubert, C. (2012). Pursuing happiness. Kyklos (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. K. (1987). On ethics & economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Shizgal, P. (1999). On the neural computation of utility: Implications from studies of brain stimulation reward. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 500–524). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2008(1), 1–87. Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. K., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Stiglitz–Sen–Fitoussi commission report.Google Scholar
- Sugden, R. (2006). Taking unconsidered preferences seriously. In S. Olsaretti (Ed.), Preferences and well-being (pp. 209–232). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar