Social Indicators Research

, Volume 111, Issue 1, pp 203–217 | Cite as

The Contribution of Job and Partner Satisfaction to the Homeostatic Defense of Subjective Wellbeing

  • Lufanna C. H. LaiEmail author
  • Robert A. Cummins


Two studies investigate subjective wellbeing (SWB) homeostasis. The first investigates the contribution of job satisfaction (JS) and partner satisfaction (PS) to the homeostatic defense of SWB. The extant model of homeostasis does not include either variable. The second study investigates the relationship between Homeostatically Protected Mood (HPMood) and other factors involved in the homeostatic model. It has been proposed that HPMood is the basic, biologically determined, positive mood that saturates SWB and other related variables, and forms the basis of the SWB set-point. Thus, if HPMood is an individual difference and it perfuses other homeostatic variables, then HPMood should be responsible for much of the shared variance between such variables. Two comparative samples are involved. One is a group of 171 Hong Kong Chinese recruited through convenience sampling. The other is a group of 343 Australians recruited via a general population survey. Results indicate that both JS and PS predict significant variance in Global Life Satisfaction beyond the existing factors in the homeostatic model. It is also found that, after controlling for the effect of HPMood, the strength of correlations between SWB and other homeostatic variables is significantly diminished. The implications of these findings are discussed.


Subjective wellbeing Personal Wellbeing Index Homeostatically protected mood Homeostatic model Global life satisfaction Cultural response bias 


  1. Alloy, L. B., & Athrens, A. H. (1987). Depression and pessimism for the future: Biased use of statistically relevant information in predictions for self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 366–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Block, J., & Robins, R. W. (1993). A longitudinal study of consistency and change in self-esteem from early adolescence to early adulthood. Child Development, 64, 909–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blore, J. D., Stokes, M. A., Mellor, D., Firth, D., Firth, L., & Cummins, R. A. (2010). Comparing multiple discrepancies theory to affective models of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 100(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. (2003). Optimism. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Sydner (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: Handbook of models and measures. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  7. Chambers, S., Cummins, R. A., Mellor, D., Firth, L., & Stokes, M. (2005). Test of Cummins’ homeostatic theory of subjective wellbeing. Melbourne: School of Psychology, Deakin University.Google Scholar
  8. Chambers, S., Hollway, J., Parsons, E-R., & Wallage, C. (2003). Perceived control and wellbeing. Paper presented at the 5th Australian Conference on Quality of Life, Melbourne, Australia, November.Google Scholar
  9. Chiu, R. K. (1998). Relationships among role conflicts, role satisfaction and life satisfaction: Evidence from Hong Kong. Social Behavior and Personality, 26(4), 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chu, P. S., Saucier, D. A., & Hafner, E. (2010). Meta-analysis of the relationships between social support and well-being in children and adolescents. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(6), 624–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the trail of the gold standard for subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cummins, R. A. (1998). The second approximation to an international standard for life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43, 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cummins, R. A. (2003). Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Social Indicators Research, 64, 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A Synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cummins, R. A., Gibson, A., Weinberg, M., Collard, J., & Chester, M. (2009). Australian unity wellbeing index: Report 21.0. The wellbeing of Australiansgambling, chocolate and swine flu. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. ISBN 978 1 74156 125 8.
  18. Cummins, R. A., Gullone, E., & Lau, A. L. D. (2002). A model of subjective wellbeing homeostasis: The role of personality. The Universality of Subjective Wellbeing Indicators, pp. 7–46.Google Scholar
  19. Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Weinberg. M., Perera, C., Gibson-Prosser, A., Collard, J., & Horfiniak, K. (2010). Australian unity wellbeing index: Report 24.0The wellbeing of Australianstrust, life better/worse and climate change. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. ISBN 978 1 74156 148 7.
  21. Davern, M., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective/cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Scollon, C. K. N., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgments: Global happiness is not the sum of its parts. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and wellbeing: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hateley, L. (2005). Experiential influences on subjective wellbeing: The role of loneliness, transport accessibility and geographic location. Thesis, Melbourne: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  25. Helgeson, V. S. (1992). Moderators of the relation between perceived control and adjustment to chronic illness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 656–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2001a). Happiness, introversion-extraversion and happy introverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2001b). Emotional stability as a major dimension of happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1357–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. International Wellbeing Group. (2005). Personal Wellbeing Index-Adult (2nd ed). Retrieved on 11 January 2006, from
  29. International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal Wellbeing Index-Adult (PWI-A). Retrieved on 1 April 2010, from
  30. Lau, A. L. D., Cummins, R. A., & McPherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 72, 404–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lauber, C., & Bowen, J. L. (2010). Low mood and employment: When affective disorders are intertwined with the workplace—A UK perspective. International Review of Psychiatry, 22(2), 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leelakulthanit, O., & Day, R. D. (1993). Cross cultural comparisons of quality of life of Thais and Americans. Social Indicators Research, 30, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lu, L. (2001). Understanding happiness: A look into the Chinese folk psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matikka, L. M. (1996). Effects of psychological factors on the perceived quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(2), 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McLennan, J., & Bates, G. W. (1993). Vulnerability to psychological distress: Empirical and conceptual distinctions between measures of neuroticism and negative affect. Psychological Reports, 73, 1315–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller, B. L. (2005). The relationship of healthy eating, exercise and sleep with subjective wellbeing. Thesis, Melbourne: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  37. O’Brien, W. H., VanEgeren, L., & Mumby, P. B. (1995). Predicting health behaviors using measures of optimism and perceived risk. Health Values, 19, 21–28.Google Scholar
  38. Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  39. Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55, 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Piccolo, R. F., Judge, T. A., Takahashi, K., Watanabe, N., & Locke, E. A. (2005). Core self-evaluations in Japan: Relative effects on job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and happiness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 965–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schmitt, N., & Bedeian, A. G. (1982). A comparison of LISREL and two-stage least squares analyses of a hypothesized life-job satisfaction reciprocal relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 806–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 93–105.Google Scholar
  45. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1991). Evaluating one’s life: A judgement model of subjective well-being. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 27–47). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  46. Silver, R. L., & Wortman, C. B. (1980). Coping with undesirable life events. In J. Garber & M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Human helplessness: Theory and application. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  48. Tong, Y., & Song, S. (2004). A study on general self-efficacy and subjective wellbeing of low SES college students in a Chinese university. College Student Journal, 38(4), 637–643.Google Scholar
  49. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1992). On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 441–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilson, K., & Gullone, E. (1999). The relationship between personality and affect over the life span. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1141–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wong, P. S. (1993). Satisfaction with life. In S. K. Lau, M. K. Lee, P. S. Wan, & S. L. Wong (Eds.), Indicators of social development (pp. 399–438). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lingnan Institute of Further EducationLingnan UniversityTuen MunHong Kong
  2. 2.School of PsychologyDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations