Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 110, Issue 3, pp 1221–1244 | Cite as

The Missing Link: Deficits of Country-Level Studies. A Review of 22 Articles Explaining Life Satisfaction

  • Alexandra NonnenmacherEmail author
  • Jürgen Friedrichs
Article

Abstract

To explain country differences in an analytical or structural dependent variable, the application of a macro–micro-model containing contextual hypotheses is necessary. Our methodological study examines whether empirical studies apply such a model. We propose that a theoretical base for country differences is well described in multilevel studies, but aggregate and individual data analyses fail to specify contextual hypotheses ex ante (in the theory section of an article) and instead elaborate on macro–micro explanations ex post (in the discussion section). To test our assumptions, we analyzed 22 studies published in journals cited in the Social Science Citation Index between 2007 and 2010, which compare countries with respect to life satisfaction. Results are in accordance with our expectations. We conclude that cross-country comparisons should apply a macro–micro-model theoretically and empirically, if possible, and include the meso level, if appropriate. In case of insufficient data (i. e. only individual level or aggregate level data), applying a macro–micro-model theoretically may prevent premature conclusions.

Keywords

Life satisfaction Happiness Well-being Macro–micro-model Cross-country comparison Methodological study 

References

  1. Abdallah, S., Thompson, S., & Marks, N. (2008). Estimating worldwide life satisfaction. Ecological Economics, 65, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramowitz, M. (1959). The welfare interpretation of secular trends in national income and product. In M. Abramowitz, A. Alchian, K. J. Arrow, P. A. Baran, P. W. Cartwright, H. B. Chenery, G. W. Hilton, H. S. Houthakker, C. E. Lindblom, M. W. Reder, T. Scitovsky, E. S. Shaw, & L. Tarshis (Eds.), The allocation of economic resources: Essays in honor of Bernard Francis Haley (pp. 1–22). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aidt, T. S., & Gassebner, M. (2010). Do autocratic states trade less? World Bank Economic Review, 24, 38–76.Google Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2007). The bigger the better? Evidence of the effect of government size on life satisfaction around the world. Public Choice, 130, 267–292.Google Scholar
  7. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2008a). Cross-country determinants of life satisfaction: Exploring different determinants across groups in society. Social Choice and Welfare, 30, 119–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2008b). On decentralization and life satisfaction. Economics Letters, 99, 147–151.Google Scholar
  9. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2010). Formal institutions and subjective well-being: Revisiting the cross-country evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being u-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science and Medicine, 66, 1733–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blasius, J., Friedrichs, J., & Galster, G. C. (Eds.). (2009). Quantifying neighbourhood effects. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bonini, A. N. (2008). Cross-national variation in individual life satisfaction: Effects of national wealth, human development, and environmental conditions. Social Indicators Research, 87, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boudon, R. (2003). Beyond rational choice theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chiricos, T., Hogan, M., & Gertz, M. (1997). Racial composition of neighbourhood and fear of crime. Criminology, 35, 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coleman, J. S. (1987). Microfoundations of macrosociological behavior. In J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Münch, & N. Smelser (Eds.), The micro-macro link (pp. 151–173). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  18. Delhey, J., Hattrup, K., & Hausmann, N. (2010). From materialist to post-materialist happiness? National affluence and determinants of life satisfaction in cross-national perspective. Social Indicators Research, 97, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Demeulenaere, P. (2011). Analytical sociology and social mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995a). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864.Google Scholar
  22. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). National differences in subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundation of hedonic psychology (pp. 434–450). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
  24. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Smith, H., & Shao, L. (1995b). National differences in reported subjective well-being: Why do they occur? Social Indicators Research, 34, 7–32.Google Scholar
  25. Dietz, R. D. (2002). Estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences. Social Science Research, 31, 539–575.Google Scholar
  26. Dorn, D., Fischer, J. A. V., Kirchgässner, G., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2007). Is it culture or democracy? The impact of democracy and culture on happiness. Social Indicators Research, 82, 505–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Drobnič, S., Beham, B., & Präg, P. (2010). Good job, good life? Working conditions and quality of life in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 99, 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labour in society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). New York/London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Elliott, M., & Hayward, R. D. (2009). Religion and life satisfaction worldwide: The role of government regulation. Sociology of Religion, 70, 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Elster, J. (1979). Ulysses and the sirens: Studies in rationality and irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Engelbrecht, H.-J. (2009). Natural capital, subjective well-being, and the new welfare economics of sustainability: Some evidence from cross-country regressions. Ecological Economics, 69, 380–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Fahey, T., & Smyth, E. (2004). Do subjective indicators measure welfare? Evidence from 33 European societies. European Societies, 6, 5–27.Google Scholar
  36. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.Google Scholar
  37. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402–435.Google Scholar
  38. Galster, G. C. (2008). Quantifying the effects of neighbourhood on individuals: Challenges, alternative approaches, and promising directions. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 128, 7–48.Google Scholar
  39. Gaymu, J., & Springer, S. (2010). Living conditions and life satisfaction of older Europeans living alone: A gender and cross-country analysis. Ageing & Society, 30, 1153–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hedström, P. (2005). Dissecting the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hoskins, B. L., & Mascherini, M. (2008). Measuring active citizenship through the development of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research, 90, 459–488.Google Scholar
  43. Hox, J. J. (1995). Applied multilevel analysis. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties. http://www.fss.uu.nl/ms/jh/publist/amaboek.pdf.
  44. Iannotti, R. J., Janssen, I., Haug, E., Kololo, H., Annaheim, B., Borraccino, A., et al. (2009). Interrelationships of adolescence physical activity, screen-based sedentary behavior, and social psychological health. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness. A global perspective, 1981–2007. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 264–285.Google Scholar
  47. Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In L. E. Lynn Jr. & M. G. H. McGeary (Eds.), Inner-city-poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  48. Kacapyr, E. (2008). Cross-country determinants of satisfaction with life. International Journal of Social Economics, 35, 400–416.Google Scholar
  49. Katz, R. (2009). Intergenerational family relations and subjective well-being in old age: A cross-national study. European Journal of Ageing, 6, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Katz, R., & Lavee, Y. (2005). Families in Israel. In B. N. Adams & J. Trost (Eds.), Handbook of world families (pp. 486–506). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Kroll, C. (2008). Social capital and the happiness of nations: The importance of trust and networks for life satisfaction in a cross-national perspective. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  52. Lambsdorff, J. G. (2003). How corruption affects productivity. Kyklos, 56, 457–474.Google Scholar
  53. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Menzel, H. (1961). On the relation between individual and collective properties. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), A sociological reader on complex organizations (pp. 422–440). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  54. Lookwood, D. (1964). Social integration and system integration. In G. K. Zollschan & H. W. Hirsch (Eds.), Explorations in social change. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  55. Lowenstein, A., Katz, R., & Gur-Yaish, N. (2007). Reciprocity in parent-child exchange and life satisfaction among the elderly: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 865–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mayntz, R. (2005). Soziale Mechanismen in der Analyse gesellschaftlicher Makro-Phänomene. In U. Schimank & R. Greshoff (Eds.), Was erklärt die Soziologie? (pp. 204–227). Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  57. McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Toronto: van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  58. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Opp, K.-D. (1999). Contending conceptions of the theory of rational action. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, 171–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Opp, K.-D. (2004). Erklärung durch Mechanismen: Probleme und Alternative. In R. Kecskes, M. Wagner, & C. Wolf (Eds.), Angewandte Soziologie (pp. 361–379). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  62. Ram, R. (2009). Government spending and happiness of the population: Additional evidence from large cross-country samples. Public Choice, 138, 483–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ram, R. (2010). Social capital and happiness: Additional cross-country evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ravens-Sieberer, U., Torsheim, T., Hetland, J., Vollebergh, W., Cavallo, F., Jericek, H., et al. (2009). Subjective health, symptom load and quality of life of children and adolescents in Europe. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Robertson, D., & Symons, J. (2003). Do peer groups matter? Peer group versus schooling effects on academic attainment. Economica, 70, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ross, C. E., & Jang, S. J. (2000). Neighbourhood disorder, fear, and mistrust: The buffering role of social ties with neighbours. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.Google Scholar
  68. Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason (Vol. III). Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.Google Scholar
  69. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Soons, J. P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-being differences in 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1141–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2003). Institutions matter for procedural utility: An economic study of the impact of political participation possibilities. In R. Mudambi, P. Navarra, & G. Sobbrio (Eds.), Economic welfare, international business and global institutional change (pp. 81–99). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  72. Sujoldžić, A., & De Lucia, A. (2007). A cross-cultural study of adolescents—BMI, body image and psychological well-being. Collegium Antropologicum, 31, 123–130.Google Scholar
  73. Taylor, R. B. (1997). Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighbourhoods: Ecology, micro ecology, and the systemic model of social disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 113–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Thrupp, M., Lauder, H., & Robinson, T. (2002). School composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tokuda, Y., Fujii, S., & Inoguchi, T. (2010). Individual and country-level effects of social trust on happiness: The Asia barometer survey. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2574–2593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wallace, C., & Pichler, F. (2009). More participation, happier society? A comparative study of civil society and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 93, 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Welsch, H. (2008). The welfare costs of corruption. Applied Economics, 40, 1839–1849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Political ScienceLeibniz University HannoverHannoverGermany
  2. 2.Research Institute for SociologyUniversity of CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations