Does How You Measure Income Make a Difference to Measuring Poverty? Evidence from the UK
- 749 Downloads
Income is regarded as one of the clearest indicators of socioeconomic status and wellbeing in the developed world and is highly correlated with a wide range of outcomes. Despite its importance, there remains an issue as to the best way to collect income as part of surveys. This paper examines differences in how income is collected in a nationally representative UK birth cohort, the Millennium Cohort Study, looking at variations by questions asked and by respondent characteristics before then examining the implications different methods of collecting and reporting income may have for measuring poverty. Results show that less than a third of respondents give consistent information on income between measurement tools. Using multiple questions is associated with a substantially lower response rate but this method generally results in a higher estimate of family income than using a single question. This is particularly true for certain groups of the population—those on means tested benefits, in self-employment and in part-time employment. Not surprisingly then in our analysis of poverty, using a single question produces an inflated proportion of families who could be classified as living in poverty and is less associated with other measures of financial deprivation than the more conservative poverty measure based on multiple questions.
KeywordsIncome Survey design Poverty Measurement error
The authors would like to thank John Micklewright for early discussions about the issues covered in this paper and to he and Heather Joshi for comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Thanks too to the anonymous referees and the Editor of Social Indicators Research for their useful comments and suggestions.
- Adams, N., Barton, A., Bray, S., Johnson, G., & Matejic, P. (2010). Households below average income: An analysis of the income distribution 1994/95–2008/09. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
- Becker, I., Frick, J. R., Grabka, M. M., Hauser, R., Krause, P., & Wagner, G. G. (2003). A comparison of the main household income surveys for Germany: EVS and SOEP. In R. Hauser & I. Becker (Eds.), Reporting on the income distribution and poverty: Perspectives from a German and European point of view. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Boheim, R., & Jenkins, S. P. (2006). A comparison of current and annual measures of income in the British Household Panel Survey. Journal of Official Statistics, 22(4), 733–758.Google Scholar
- Bound, J., Brown, C., & Mathiowetz, N. (2000). Measurement error in survey data: Report No. 00-450. Ann Arbor, MI: Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Centre for Longitudinal Studies (2009). Millennium cohort study sweep 4: Questionnaire documentation. http://www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/core/documents/download.asp?id=1235andlog_stat=1.
- Collins, D., & White, A. (1996). In search of an income question for the 2001 census. Survey Methodology Bulletin, 39(7), 2–10.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2010). Income poverty and material deprivation in European countries. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
- Francesconi, M., Sutherland, H., & Zantomio, F. (2009). A comparison of earnings measures from longitudinal and cross-sectional surveys: Evidence from the UK. Colchester: Institute for Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
- Gordon, D. (1998). Measuring income in the Breadline Britain 1998 survey. In J. Bradshaw, D. Gordon, R. Levitas, S. Middleton, C. Pantazis, S. Payne, & P. Townsend (Eds.), Perceptions of poverty and social exclusion 1998. Bristol: Townsend Centre for International Poverty Research, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
- Hansen, K., & Kneale, D. (2011). Measuring income in the millennium cohort study: Bands, units and groups—does it make a difference? CLS Working Paper. London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
- Hawkes, D., & Plewis, I. (2008). Missing income data in the millennium cohort study. London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
- Hicks, J. R. (1939). Value and capital: An inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Ketende, S. C., & Joshi, H. (2008). Income and poverty. In K. Hansen & H. Joshi (Eds.), Millennium cohort study third survey: A user’s guide to initial findings. London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
- Mayer, S. E. (1997). What money can’t buy: Family income and children’s life chances. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Micklewright, J., & Schnepf, S. (2010). How reliable are income data collected with a single question? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 173(2), 409–429.Google Scholar
- Moore, J. C., Stinson, L. L., & Welniack, E. J. J. (2000). Income measurement error in surveys: A review. Journal of Official Statistics, 16(4), 331–362.Google Scholar
- The Canberra Group. (2001). Final report and recommendations. Ottawa: The Canberra Group, Expert Group on Household Income Statistics.Google Scholar
- Van de Poel, E., Hosseinpoor, A. R., Speybroek, N., Van Ourti, T., & Vega, J. (2008). Socioeconomic inequality in malnutrition in developing countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation, 86(4), 241–320.Google Scholar