Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 109, Issue 2, pp 135–188 | Cite as

Money, Sociability and Happiness: Are Developed Countries Doomed to Social Erosion and Unhappiness?

Time-series Analysis of Social Capital and Subjective Well-being in Western Europe, Australia, Canada and Japan
  • Francesco SarracinoEmail author
Article

Abstract

Discovering whether social capital endowments in modern societies have been subjected or not to a process of gradual erosion is one of the most debated topics in recent economic literature. Inaugurated by Putnam’s pioneering studies, the debate on social capital trends has been recently revived by Stevenson and Wolfers (2008) contending Easterlin’s assessment. Present work is aimed at finding evidence for the relationship between changes in social capital and subjective well-being in western Europe, Australia, Canada and Japan between 1980 and 2005. In particular, I would like to answer questions such as: (1) is social capital in western Europe, Canada, Australia and Japan declining? Is such erosion a general trend of modern and richer societies or is it a characteristic feature of the American one? (2) can social capital trend help explain subjective well-being trend? Therefore, present research considers three different set of proxies of social capital controlling for time and socio-demographic aspects using WVS-EVS data between 1980 and 2005. Present results are encouraging, showing evidence of positive correlation between several proxies of social capital and both happiness and life satisfaction. Furthermore, results show that during last twenty-five years people in some of the most modern and developed countries have persistently lost confidence in the judicial system, religious institutions, parliament and civil service.

Keywords

Subjective well-being Social capital Relational goods Easterlin paradox Time-series Economic development EVS WVS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Stefano Bartolini, Ennio Bilancini, Jaime Diez Medrano, Malgorzata Mikucka, Nizamul Islam and the VALCOS team for their advices, comments on every step of present work and data management support. The usual disclaimers apply.

References

  1. Adam, F. (2008). Mapping social capital across Europe: Findings, trends and methodological shortcomings of cross-national surveys. Social Science Information, 47(2), 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2006). Measuring trends in leisure: The allocation of time over five decades. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working papers (2).Google Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88.Google Scholar
  4. Allison, P. (2001).Missing data. SAGE university paper 136.Google Scholar
  5. Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Pugno, M. (2008). American declines of social capital and happiness: Is there any linkage? Mimeo: University of Siena.Google Scholar
  6. Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Sarracino, F. (2009). Sociability predicts happiness: World-wide evidence from time series. University of Siena, Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica—Working paper n 579.Google Scholar
  7. Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Sarracino, F. (2010). Predicting the trend of well-being in Germany: How much do comparisons, adaptation and sociability matter? CEPS/Instead Working Papers 2010-07.Google Scholar
  8. Becchetti, L., Londono Bedoya, D., & Trovato, G. (2006). Income, relational goods and happiness. CEIS working paper (forth.Google Scholar
  9. Blanchflower, D. (2008). International evidence on well-being. IZA Discussion Papers (3354).Google Scholar
  10. Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2008a). Heart rate and happiness. Presentation at the University of Zurich.Google Scholar
  12. Bruni, L. (2002). Sul consumo, sui beni, sulla felicita. In L. Bruni, V. Pelligra (Eds.), Economia come impegno civile. Relazionalita, ben-essere ed economia di comunione, Citta Nuova Editrice, Roma.Google Scholar
  13. Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65(3–4), 506–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costa, D., & Kahn, M. (2003). Understanding the decline in social capital, 1952–1998. Kyklos, 56, 17–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311–327. doi: 10.1093/esr/jci022, URL http://esr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/21/4/311, http://esr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/21/4/311.pdf.
  16. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: evidence from surveys of happiness. American Economic Review, (91).Google Scholar
  18. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. Warwick Economic Research Papers, (615).Google Scholar
  19. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-being for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? some empirical evidence. In P. David, W. Melvin (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 98–125). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Easterlin, R. (2001a). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111.Google Scholar
  23. Ferrer-i Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferrer-i Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frank, R. (1997) The frame of reference as a public good. . Economic Journal, 107.Google Scholar
  26. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy, and institution. Economic Journal, 110(466), 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002b). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2007). Should national happiness be maximized? International conference: Is happiness measurable and what do those measures mean for policy? 2–3 April 2007, University of Rome—Tor Vergata.Google Scholar
  29. Helliwell, J. (2001). Social capital, the economy and wellbeing. In The review of economic performance: The longest decade: Canada in the 1990s. Centre for the Study of Living Standards, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  30. Helliwell, J. (2002). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper series (9065).Google Scholar
  31. Helliwell, J. (2006). Well-being, social capital and public policy: what’s new? The Economic Journal, 116.Google Scholar
  32. Research Initiative P (2005) Social capital as a public policy tool. Tech. rep., Government of Canada.Google Scholar
  33. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kenny, C. (1999). Does growth cause happiness, or does happiness cause growth? Kyklos, 52(1).Google Scholar
  35. Kenny, C. (2005). Does development make you happy? Subjective wellbeing and economic growth in Developing countries. Social Indicators Research, 73.Google Scholar
  36. Knack, S. (2003). Groups, growth and trust: Cross-country evidence on the olson and putnam hypotheses. Public Choice, (117), 341–355.Google Scholar
  37. Ladd, E. (1996). The data just don’t show erosion of America’s social capital. Public Perspective, 7, 1–30.Google Scholar
  38. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  39. Leigh, A. (2003). Trends in social capital. In K. Christensen, D. Levinson (Eds.), Encyclo: From the village to the virtual world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Lim, C., & Putnam, R. (2009). Praying alone is no fun: Religion, social networks and subjective well-being. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  41. Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morales, L. (2004). Changing patterns of associational involvement in Europe. ECPR Joint Sessions, Uppsala, Workshop 8—The changing structure of civil society, directed by Derrick Purdue & Mario Diani.Google Scholar
  43. Norris, P. (2004). Making democracies work: Social capital and civic engagement in 47 societies. British Journal of Political Science, 35, 149–167.Google Scholar
  44. OECD (2001a). Are trust and civic engagement declining in oecd countries?. In The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital (pp. 99–103). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  45. OECD (2001b). The evidence on social capital. In The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital (pp. 39–63). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  46. Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation and social rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Oswald, A. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. The Economic Journal, 107.Google Scholar
  48. Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 88–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pink, B. (2008). Australian social trends 2008. Tech. Rep. 4102.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  50. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  51. Putnam, R., Leonardi, L., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Robinson, R., & Jackson, E. (2001). Is trust in others declining in America? An age period cohort analysis. Social Science Research, 30, 117–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth. NBER working paper series (16441).Google Scholar
  54. Sarracino, F. (2010a). Determinants of subjective well-being in high and low income countries: Do happiness equations differ across countries? CEPS/Instead Working Papers 2010-15.Google Scholar
  55. Sarracino, F. (2010b). Social capital and subjective well-being trends: Comparing 11 western European countries. Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(4), 482–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schafer, J. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Chapman and Hall/CRC, CRC Press Company.Google Scholar
  57. Schafer, J. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in medical research, 8, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schimmack, U., Krause, P., Wagner, G., & Schupp, J. (2009). Stability and change of well-being: An experimentally enhanced latent state-trait-error analysis. Social Indicators Research, forthcoming. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9443-8.
  59. Schneider, L., & Schimmack, U. (2009). Self-informant agreement in well-being ratings: A meta-analysis. Social Indicators Research, forthcoming. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9440-y.
  60. Schuller, T., Baron, S., & Field, J. (2000). Social capital: A review and critique. In T. Schuller, S. Baron, & J. Field (Eds.), Social capital: critical perspectives (pp. 1–39). Oxford University Press: Oxford .Google Scholar
  61. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In E. D. D Kahneman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonist psychology. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. IZA DP (3654).Google Scholar
  63. Stolle, D., & Hooghe, M. (2004). Inaccurate, exceptional, one-sided or irrelevant? The debate about the alleged decline of social capital and civic engagement in Western societies. British Journal of Political Science, 35, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Takashi, O., & Akiyoshi, Y. (2002). Measurement of social capital in Japan. Paper prepared for the social capital measurement conference, OECD and UK Office of National Statistics, London, 25–27 Sep 2002.Google Scholar
  65. Van Deth, J. (2008). Measuring social capital. In J. Van Deth, D. Castiglione, & G. Wolleb (Eds.), Handbook of social capital, chap 6 (pp. 150–175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. van Reekum, C., Urry, H., Johnstone, T., Thurow, M., Frye, C., Jackson, C., Schaefer, H., Alexander, A., & Davidson, R. (2007). Individual differences in amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity are associated with evaluation speed and psychological well-being. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Van Schaik, T. (2002). Social capital in the European values study surveys. Country paper prepared for the OECD-ONS international conference on social capital measurement, London.Google Scholar
  68. Wanous, J., & Hudy, M. (2001). Single-item reliability: A replication and extension. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEPS/INSTEADEsch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations