Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 102, Issue 3, pp 363–372 | Cite as

If GDP is Not the Answer, What is the Question? The Juncture of Capabilities, Institutions and Measurement in the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Report

  • Ming-Chang TsaiEmail author
Article

Abstract

This review essay offers an institutional critique of the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Report. The notion of human capabilities and functionings advocated by the Report demonstrates an inspirational perspective to monitor human progress in quality of life (QoL). Several measurements the Report suggested remain inadequate. The personal diary techniques have some potential as it possesses strength in recording hedonic activities, but it is relatively weak in revealing eudaimonic experiences. The Report unfortunately mixes up outcome indicators of QoL at individual level and the higher-ordered, social institutions in mapping out causal processes of human wellbeing. Future researchers can contribute by concentrating on clarifying the plausible linkage between institutions and individual wellbeing in broad sense. There is much knowledge to be gained by researchers who ask questions of “how we can change” rather than answer to “what we can measure”

Keywords

Wellbeing Social indicators Human development Social institutions Capacities theory 

References

  1. Bjornskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2010). Formal institutions and subjective well-being: Revisiting the cross-country evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carbone, G. (2009). The consequences of democratization. Journal of Democracy, 20, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, D. (2005). The capability approach: Its development, critiques and recent advances. Economic and Social Research Council-Global Poverty Research Group, GPRG-WPS-032.Google Scholar
  4. Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Easterlin, R. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Easterlin, R. (2005). Diminishing marginal utility of income? Caveat emptor. Social Indicators Research, 70, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferriss, A. L. (2002). Telesis: the use of social indicators to set goals and develop programs to change conditions. Social Indicators Research, 58, 229–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Shields, M. A. (2004). Money does matter! Evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification. American Economic Review, 94, 730–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gasper, D. (2007). Conceptualizing human needs and wellbeing. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: From theory to research (pp. 47–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gershuny, J., & Halpin, B. (1996). Time use, quality of life, and process benefits. In A. Offer (Ed.), In pursuit of the quality of life (pp. 188–210). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gough, I., McGregor, J. A., & Camfield, L. (2007). Theorizing wellbeing in international development. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: From theory to research (pp. 3–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hagerty, M. R., & Veenhoven, R. (2003). Wealth and happiness revisited—growing national income does go with greater happiness. Social Indicators Research, 64, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagerty, M., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krueger, A. B., Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N. & Stone, A. (2008). National time accounting: the currency of life. Working paper # 523, Princeton University Industrial Relations Section. New Haven: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  15. Lane, R. (2000a). The loss of happiness in market democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lane, R. (2000b). Diminishing returns of income, companionship and happiness’. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morris, M. D. (1979). Measuring the condition of the world’s poor: The physical quality of life index. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  18. Phillips, D. (2006). Quality of life: Concept, policy and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Scoppa,V. & Ponzo, M. (2008). An empirical study of happiness in Italy. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 8(1), Article 15.Google Scholar
  21. Sen, A. (1985). The standard of living. The Tanner lectures on human values. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  22. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sen, A. (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring poverty. In D. B. Grusky & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Poverty and inequality (pp. 30–46). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Sirgy, M. J., Michalos, A. C., Ferriss, A. L., et al. (2006). The quality-of-life (QOL) research movement: Past, present, and future. Social Indicators Research, 76, 343–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, A. (1776). An enquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Cosimo.Google Scholar
  27. Stewart, F. (1996). Basic needs, capabilities, and human development. In A. Offer (Ed.), In pursuit of the quality of life (pp. 46–65). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr.
  29. Streeten, P. (1981). First thing first: meeting basic human needs in the developing countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  30. Tsai, M.-C. (2006a). Does political democracy enhance human development in developing countries? A cross-national study. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65, 233–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsai, M.-C. (2006b). Economic and non-economic determinants of poverty in developing countries: competing theories and empirical evidence. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 27, 267–285.Google Scholar
  32. Tsai, M.-C. (2007). Does globalization affect human well-being? Social Indicators Research, 81, 102–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsai, M.-C. (2009). Market openness, transition economies and subjective wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 523–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tucker, V. (1999). The myth of development: A critique of eurocentric discourse. In R. Munch & D. O’Hearn (Eds.), Critical development theory: Contribution to a new paradigm (pp. 1–26). London: Zed.Google Scholar
  35. Veenhoven, R. (2005). Apparent quality-of-life in nations: how long and happy people live. Social Indicators Research, 71, 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyNational Taipei UniversitySansia District, New Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations