Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 107, Issue 1, pp 171–186 | Cite as

Perceived Social Policy Fairness and Subjective Wellbeing: Evidence from China

  • Feng Sun
  • Jing Jian XiaoEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between perceived fairness of social policies and subjective well-being. Two types of policies examined were related to income distribution and social security. Subjective well-being was measured by work and life satisfaction. In addition, subjective well-beings between different income, age, and education groups in the context of perceived social justice were compared. With data from a random telephone survey conducted in Beijing, China among 2,113 respondents, findings from structural equation modeling indicate perceived fairness of social security and income distribution policies are positively associated with subjective well-being. After controlling for income, age, and education, the effect of income distribution fairness on work satisfaction was still positive and significant but had decreased in intensity, while the effect size on life satisfaction had changed little. Effects of social security fairness on both life and work satisfaction were still significant but had changed in different directions after adding demographic variables, in which the effect on life satisfaction had increased, while the effect on work satisfaction had decreased in size.

Keywords

Subjective well-being Work satisfaction Life satisfaction Social policy fairness Social justice 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by National Social Science Fund of China to Feng Sun for a project entitled “Research on Evaluation Indicators and Methods of People’s Life” (#10BJ006).

References

  1. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2009–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science and Medicine, 66(8), 1733–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, Z. (1991). Income distribution in economic development. Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Press.Google Scholar
  4. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 119–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subject well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In R. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagerty, M. R., & Veenhoven, R. (2003). Wealth and happiness revisited: Growing national income does go with greater happiness. Social Indicators Research, 64(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Inglehart, R., Basáñez, M., Díez-Medrano, J., Halman, L., & Luijkx, R. (Eds.). (2004). Human beliefs and values: A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999–2002 values surveys. Mexico City: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  11. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspective, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lu, H. (2005). The content of world and life quality measurement. Academic Forum, 11, 109–114.Google Scholar
  13. Luo, C. (2006). Urban-rural segmentation, employment and subjective wellbeing. Economics quarterly, 3, 817–840.Google Scholar
  14. Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. Economic Journal, 107(445), 1815–1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rose, R. (2003). Health, money and wellbeing: Subject responses to post-Soviet transformation. (Working Paper) Glasgow, Scotland, UK: Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  16. Sun, F. (2002). Econometric research on consumer behavior: A case of Chinese urban residents. Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Press and Shanghai People’s Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sun, F. (2005). Maximization likelihood estimation on missing data in microeconometric analysis. Research on Quantitative and Technology Economics, 11, 51–56.Google Scholar
  18. Sun, F. (2010). Intertemporal choice and consumer behavior. Research report to China Department of Education Humanity and Social Science Research Fund and Tsinghua University Center for Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  19. Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 58(1–3), 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wong, C. K., Wong, K. Y., & Mok, B. H. (2006). Subjective well-being, societal condition and social policy: The case study of a rich Chinese society. Social Indicators Research, 78(3), 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Xing, Z. (2005). Measuring happiness: Research on subjective wellbeing. Beijing: People’s Press.Google Scholar
  22. Xing, Z. (2006). Policy implications of happiness index. Red Flag Papers, 12, 11–13.Google Scholar
  23. Zeng, H., & Yuan, Y. (2005). 2004 report of Chinese quality of life. In X. Ru (Ed.), Chinese social condition analyses and forecasts: 2005. Beijing: Social Science Literature Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations