Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 106, Issue 1, pp 133–152 | Cite as

Using Capabilities as an Alternative Indicator for Well-being

  • Luc Van OotegemEmail author
  • Elsy VerhofstadtEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper examines the potential of self-reported information on capabilities as an alternative indicator and aggregator for well-being. We survey a population of 18 year old first-year Bachelor students in applied economics and business studies and demonstrate a way in which capabilities can be measured on the level of life domains as well as on the general level of ‘life as a whole’. The data confirm the theoretical hypothesis that the set of capabilities is larger than the achieved functionings. We investigate and compare which variables influence general capabilities and satisfaction with life. We find that both concepts are equally depending on the ‘mood of the day’. On the other hand, we find some diverging influences that call for a debate on the (policy) relevance of different well-being concepts and their determining variables. The capabilities interpretation of well-being points to an important role of the parents (especially when they are divorced or rather strict) while the information on satisfaction is more related to personal and situational characteristics (such as not being single or the number of family visits).

Keywords

Well-being Capabilities Life satisfaction Measurement of well-being Survey Students 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Tom Florin and Roeland Sercu for facilitating the data-gathering, an anonymous referee and the participants at the ‘New Directions in Welfare’ conference in Oxford (2009) for valuable comments and suggestions. This research benefits from the project WELLBEBE (SD/TA/09A) off the Belgian Science Policy.

References

  1. Agresti, A. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New Jersey: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. M. (2009). Capabilities and social justice, the political philosophy of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  3. Alkire, S. (2005). Why the capability approach. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anand, P., Hunter, G., Carter, I., Dowding, K., Guala, F., & van Hees, M. (2009). The development of capability indicators. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(1), 125–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anand, P., Hunter, G., & Smith, R. (2005). Capabilities and well-being: Evidence based on the Sen-Nussbaum approach to welfare. Social Indicators Research, 74(1), 9–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anand, P., & van Hees, M. (2006). Capabilities and achievements: An empirical study. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 268–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boarini, R., Johansson, A., & d’Ercole, M. M. (2006). Alternative measures of well-being. OECD Social, Employment and Migration. Working paper no. 33, 37 p.Google Scholar
  8. Brockmann, H., & Delhey, J. (2010). Introduction: The dynamics of happiness and the dynamics of happiness research. Social Indicators Research, 97(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burchardt, T. (2009). Agency goals, adaptation and capability sets. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(1), 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chow, H. P. H. (2005). Life satisfaction among university students in a Canadian prairie city: A multivariate analysis. Social Indicators Research, 70(2), 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Constanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., et al. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61, 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Deneulin, S. (2009). An introduction to the human development and capability approach. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  14. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2006). Review of research on the influences on personal well-being and application to policy making, Report for Defra, 193 p.Google Scholar
  15. Easterlin, R. (2005). Building a better theory of well-being. In L. Bruni & L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness, framing the analysis (pp. 29–61). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fleurbaey, M. (2006). Capabilities, functionings and refined functionings. Journal of Human Development, 7(3), 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fleurbaey, M. (2008). Fairness, responsibility and welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gasper, D. (2007). What is the capability approach? Its core, rationale, partners and dangers. Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(3), 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). US: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Higgs, N. (2006). Measuring and understanding the well-being of South Africans: Everyday quality of life in South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 81(2), 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaufman, A. (2006). Capabilities equality, basic issues and problems. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Kuklys, W. (2005). Amartya Sen’s capability approach. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Kusago, T. (2007). Rethinking of economic growth and life satisfaction in post WWII Japan–a fresh approach. Social Indicators Research, 81(1), 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness, lessons from a new science. London: Allan Lane.Google Scholar
  28. Moro-Egido, A. I., & Panades, J. (2010). An analysis of student satisfaction: Full-time vs. part-time students. Social Indicators Research, 96(2), 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Norrish, J. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2008). Is the study of happiness a worthy scientific pursuit. Social Indicators Research, 87(3), 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Sullivan, G. (2010). The relationship between hope, eustress, self-efficacy and life satisfaction among undergraduates. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9662z.
  31. Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2008). Research methods for business students. Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Sawa, T. (1978). Information criteria for discriminating among alternative regression models. Econometrica, 46(6), 1273–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schokkaert, E. (2007). Capabilities and satisfaction with life. Journal of Human Development, 8(3), 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schokkaert, E. (2009). The capabilities approach. In P. Anand, C. Puppe, & P. Pattanaik (Eds.), The handbook of rational and social choice (pp. 542–566). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sen, A. (1984). The living standard. Oxford Economic Papers, 36, 74–90.Google Scholar
  37. Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  38. Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum & A. K. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sirgy, M. J., Michalos, A. C., Ferriss, A. L., Easterlin, R., Patrick, D., & Pavot, W. (2006). The Quality-of-Life (QoL) research movement: past, present and future. Social Indicators Research, 76(3), 343–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Verbeek, M. (2000). A guide to modern econometrics. West-Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HABEUniversity College GhentGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Higher Institute of Labour Studies (HIVA)KULeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.SherppaGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations