Social Indicators Research

, Volume 106, Issue 1, pp 41–59 | Cite as

Exploring Time Perspective in Greek Young Adults: Validation of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory and Relationships with Mental Health Indicators

  • Fotios Anagnostopoulos
  • Fay Griva


In this article we examine the factorial structure of the Greek version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI; Zimbardo and Boyd in J Personal Soc Psychol 77:1271–1288, 1999), in a sample of 337 university students, using principal axis factoring (PAF) with oblique rotation, and its dimensionality using parallel analysis. Moreover, we evaluate the internal consistency reliability, the convergent validity (through associations with mental health indicators such as dispositional optimism, self-esteem, trait anxiety, depression, and proactive coping), as well as discriminant, and differential validity of this instrument. The results indicated that the ZTPI had a 5-factor structure (past negative, past positive, present fatalistic, present hedonistic, future). Correlational analyses indicated that an aversive view of the past, and a fatalistic attitude toward life were positively and significantly associated with trait anxiety and depression, while they were negatively correlated with self-esteem, proactive coping, and dispositional optimism. Future time perspective was positively associated with proactive coping, whereas a positive attitude toward the past was negatively associated with depression and trait anxiety. Psychometric properties of the five ZTPI scales were satisfactory (Cronbach’s alphas ranging from .710 to .845), thus facilitating the robust investigation of time perspective in Greek speaking populations. However confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the “positive attitude toward the past” dimension might not be a good indicator of time perspective. We discuss the theoretical implications of these findings for future studies of time perspective.


Time perspective Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory Validity Mental health indicators 



Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory


Principal axis factoring


Exploratory factor analysis


Confirmatory factor analysis



The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful advice and support offered by Professor Philip Zimbardo and Anna Sircova.


  1. Apostolidis, T., & Fieulaine, N. (2004). Validation française de l’échelle de temporalité—The Zimbardo time perspective inventory (ZTPI). Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 54, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apostolidis, T., Fieulaine, N., Simonin, L., & Rolland, G. (2006). Cannabis use, time perspective and risk perception: Evidence of a moderating effect. Psychology and Health, 25, 571–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspinwall, L. G. (2005). The psychology of future- oriented thinking: From achievement to proactive coping, adaptation, and aging. Motivation & Emotion, 29, 203–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bitsko, M. J., Stern, M., Dillon, R., Russell, C. E., & Laver, J. (2008). Happiness and time perspective as potential mediators of quality of life and depression in adolescent cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 50, 613–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boniwell, I. (2005). Beyond time management: How the latest research on time perspective and perceived time use can assist clients with time-related concerns. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 3, 61–74.Google Scholar
  6. Boniwell, I., Osin, E., Linley, P. A., & Ivanchenko, G. V. (2010). A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 165–180). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Boyd, J. N., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2005). Time perspective, health, and risk taking. In A. Strathman & J. Joireman (Eds.), Understanding behaviour in the context of time: Theory, research, and application (pp. 85–107). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Castellan, N. J. (1992). Shuffling arrays: Appearances may be deceiving. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 24, 72–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diaz-Morales, J. F. (2006). Estructura factorial y fiabilidad del inventario de pespectiva temporal de Zimbardo. Psicothema, 18, 565–571.Google Scholar
  12. Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time & Society, 17, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fountoulakis, K., Iacovides, A., Kleanthous, S., Samolis, S., Kaprinis, S. G., & Bech, P. (2001). Reliability, validity and psychometric properties of the Greek translation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale. BMC Psychiatry, 1, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fountoulakis, K. N., Papadopoulou, M., Kleanthous, S., Papadopoulou, A., Bizeli, V., Nimatoudis, I., et al. (2006). Reliability and psychometric properties of the Greek translation of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory form Y: Preliminary data. Annals of General Psychiatry, 5, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glorfeld, L. W. (1995). An improvement on Horn’s parallel analysis methodology for selecting the correct number of factors to retain. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gouveia, V. V., & Ros, M. (2000). Hofstede and Schwartz’s models for classifying individualism at the cultural level: Their relation to macro-social and macro-economic variables. Psicothema, 12(Suppl), 25–33.Google Scholar
  18. Greenglass, E. R., Schwarzer, R., Jakubiec, D., Fiksenbaum, L., & Taubert, S. (1999). The proactive coping inventory (PCI): A multidimensional research instrument. Retrieved 22 October 2009, from pci.doc [On-line publication].
  19. Griva, F., & Anagnostopoulos, F. (2010). Positive psychological states and anxiety: The mediating effect of proactive coping. Psychological Reports, 107, 795–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guarino, A., DePascalis, V., & DiChiacchio, C. (1999). Breast cancer prevention, time perspective, and trait anxiety. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rome.Google Scholar
  21. Guthrie, L. C., Butler, S. C., & Ward, M. M. (2009). Time perspective and socioeconomic status: a link to socioeconomic disparities in health? Social Science and Medicine, 68, 2145–2151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herdman, M., Fox-Rushby, J., & Badia, X. (1997). ‘Equivalence’ and the translation and adaptation of health-related quality of life questionnaires. Quality of Life Research, 6, 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2004). Cultures and organizations-software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Horstmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 703–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  28. Keough, K. A., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 149–164.Google Scholar
  29. Korkeila, J., Lehtinen, V., Bijl, R., Dalgard, O.-S., Kovess, V., Morgan, A., et al. (2003). Establishing a set of mental health indicators for Europe. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 31, 451–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., D’Alessio, M., & Gurrieri, G. (2009a). Suicidal ideation and time perspective in high school students. European Psychiatry, 24, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laghi, F., D’Alessio, M., Pallini, S., & Baiocco, R. (2009b). Attachment representations and time perspective in adolescence. Social Indicators Research, 90, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Livneh, H., & Martz, E. (2007). Reactions to diabetes and their relationship to time orientation. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 30, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lyrakos, G. N., Damigos, D., Mavreas, V., Kostopanagiotou, G., & Dimoliatis, I. D. K. (2010). A translation and validation study of the Life Orientation Test Revised in the Greek speaking population of nurses among three hospitals in Athens and Ioannina. Social Indicators Research, 95, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ortuño, V., & Gamboa, V. (2009). Estrutura factorial do Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory—ZTPI numa amostra de estudantes universitários portugueses. Avances en Psicologia Latinoamericana, 27, 21–32.Google Scholar
  35. Preau, M., Apostolidis, T., Francois, C., Raffi, F., & Spire, B. (2007). Time perspective and quality of life among HIV-infected patients in the context of HAART. AIDS Care, 19, 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rothspan, S., & Read, S. J. (1996). Present versus future time perspective and HIV risk among heterosexual college students. Health Psychology, 15, 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saucier, G., Georgiades, S., Tsaousis, I., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The factor structure of Greek personality adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 856–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 173–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Arndt, J., & Routledge, C. (2008). Nostalgia: past, present, and future. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 304–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., & Baden, D. (2004). Nostalgia: Conceptual issues and existential functions. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  44. Spanea, E., Anagnostopoulos, F., Kalantzi-Azizi, A., & Skarlos, D. (2005). Psychosocial factors and adjustment to breast cancer: a structural equation model. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 2, 159–182.Google Scholar
  45. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  47. Taulbut, M., Parkinson, J., Catto, S., & Gordon, D. (2009). Scotland’s mental health and its context: Adults 2009. Glasgow: NHS Health Scotland.Google Scholar
  48. Vassiliou, V. G., & Vassiliou, G. (1973). The implicative meaning of the Greek concept of Philotimo. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 4, 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Worrell, F. C., & Mello, Z. R. (2007). The reliability and validity of Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory scores in academically talented adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual- differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPanteion University of Social and Political SciencesAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations