Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 105, Issue 3, pp 333–341 | Cite as

Purpose, Mood, and Pleasure in Predicting Satisfaction Judgments

  • Ed DienerEmail author
  • Frank Fujita
  • Louis Tay
  • Robert Biswas-Diener
Article

Abstract

We examined the extent to which satisfaction with life, with one’s self, and with one’s day are predicted by pleasure, purpose in life, interest, and mood. In a sample of 222 college students we found that both satisfaction with life and self-esteem were best predicted by positive feelings and an absence of negative feelings, as well as purpose in life. By contrast, satisfaction with individual days was predicted by negative feelings, and very strongly predicted by positive feelings, but not by purpose in life. In predicting life satisfaction purpose in life provided a buffering effect for lower levels of mood. People high in purpose in life reported high levels of life satisfaction even with moderate levels of mood. Thus, what makes a satisfying day is different from what makes a satisfying life or self. Life and self satisfaction were predicted significantly by purpose in life even after controlling for physical pleasure and affect balance, suggesting that they are more than just hedonic variables.

Keywords

Daily satisfaction Life satisfaction Purpose Feelings Self-esteem 

References

  1. Biswas-Diener, R., Vittersø, J., & Diener, E. (2005). Most people are mildly happy, but there is cultural variation: The Inughuit, the Amish and the Maasai. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Crumbaugh, J. C. (1968). Cross validation of Purpose-in-Life test based on Frankl’s concepts. Journal of Individual Psychology, 24, 74–81.Google Scholar
  4. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fowers, B., Mollica, C., & Procacci, E. (2010). Constitutive and instrumental goal orientations and their relations with eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haybron, D. M. (2008). The pursuit of unhappiness: The elusive psychology of well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Curious: Discover the missing ingredient to a fulfilling life. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  10. Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keyes, C., & Annas, J. (2009). Feeling good and functioning well: Distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. King, L. A. & Hicks, J. A. (2009). The detection and construction of meaning in life events. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 317–330.Google Scholar
  13. King, L., & Scollon, C. (2011). What people really want in life and why it matters: contributions from research on folk theories of the good life. In R. Biswas-Diener (Ed.), Positive psychology as social change. Dordrecht: Springer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kopperud, K. H., & Vittersø, J. (2008). Distinctions between hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: Results from a day reconstruction study among Norwegian jobholders. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 174–181.Google Scholar
  15. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological review, 110(1), 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ryan, R. M., & Huta, V. (2009). Wellness as healthy functioning or wellness as happiness: The importance of eudaimonic thinking. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 202–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Scollon, C. N., & Wirtz, D. (2010). Is the good life happy, meaningful, or wealthy? Cultural differences and the context-sensitive self. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  21. Sheldon, K., & Elliot, A. (1999). Goal striving, need-satisfaction, and longitudinal wellbeing: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vitterso, J., Oelmann, H. I., & Wang, A. L. (2009). Life satisfaction is not a balanced estimator of the good life: Evidence from reaction time measures and self-reported emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Waterman, A. S. (2007). On the importance of distinguishing hedonia and eudaimonia when considering the hedonic treadmill. American Psychologist, 62, 612–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 234–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ed Diener
    • 1
    Email author
  • Frank Fujita
    • 2
  • Louis Tay
    • 1
  • Robert Biswas-Diener
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of IllinoisChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Indiana University, South BendSouth BendUSA
  3. 3.Center for Applied Positive PsychologyMilwaukieOregon

Personalised recommendations