Social Indicators Research

, Volume 102, Issue 1, pp 157–168 | Cite as

Never Waste a Good Crisis: Towards Social Sustainable Development



The report by the Stiglitz Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress highlighted the idea that sustainability in essence is about quality of life. This paper discusses and elaborates this notion. It argues that sustainable development should be seen as a process which does not focus on economic development alone, but which also includes well-balanced ecological and social development. Social aspects of sustainability deserve attention because of their instrumental and intrinsic relevance. A society needs a sense of community and commitment. The presence of social capital is very important for the liveability of a society. It is argued that the amount of social capital may fluctuate over time. This means that in the long term, future societies may be better in a social respect (more trust, more participation, less inequality) than today’s. Ensuring social sustainability is thus not only a matter of ensuring that present social cohesion is preserved, but also ensuring that this cohesion will increase or improve. The paper ends by addressing lines of research on social sustainability. The following research themes are mentioned: (1) Quality of life, social capital and social cohesion in a longitudinal perspective. (2) ‘Sustainability of what, why and for whom?’ Sustainability as an issue of choice: trade-offs. (3) Civil society and governance aspects of sustainability. (4) Public perceptions, values and opinions with regard to sustainability issues and (5) Fairness and inequality in relation to sustainability policy, both nationally and internationally.


Sustainability Quality of life Social capital Monitoring 


  1. Bijl, R., & Boelhouwer, J. (2009). Participation, trust and inequality. In CBS, CPB, PBL, SCP (Ed.), Sustainability monitor for the Netherlands (Chapter 3). The Hague: CBS, CPB, PBL, SCP.Google Scholar
  2. Bijl, R., Boelhouwer, J., Pommer, E., & Schyns, P. (Eds.). (2009). The social state of the Netherlands 2009. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Social Research/SCP.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1983). Forms of capital. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  4. CBS, CPB, PBL, SCP. (2009). Sustainability monitor for the Netherlands. The Hague: CBS, CPB, PBL, SCP.Google Scholar
  5. CPB. (2009). Brede welvaart en nationaal inkomen. The Hague: CPB.Google Scholar
  6. de Boer, N., & Duyvendak, J. W. (1999). ‘De Permanente Roep om Sociaal Beleid met een Langere Adem’, Tijdschrift voor de Sociale Sector, no. 12, 1999,10–15.Google Scholar
  7. European Commission. (2002). A European strategy for sustainable development. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2009). GDP and beyond. Measuring in a changing world. Brussels, European Commission (COM(2009)433final, 20 August 2009).Google Scholar
  9. Field, J. (2003). Social capital. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  11. OECD. (2009). Measuring and fostering well-being and progress: The OECD Roadmap. Busan: OECD.Google Scholar
  12. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  14. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). (Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress). Report of the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris, 14 sept 2009. (
  15. Telos (2006). De Duurzaamheidsbalans van Brabant, 2006. De Verantwoording, Telos, Brabants Centrum voor Duurzaamheidsvraagstukken, Tilburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  16. Uslaner, E. M., & Brown, M. (2005). ‘Inequality, trust and civic engagement’. American Politics Research, 3(6), 868–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. WCED. (1987). Our common future. WCED, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Netherlands Institute for Social Research/SCPThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations