Social Indicators Research

, Volume 102, Issue 1, pp 99–110 | Cite as

Internet Service Cognition and Use, and Their Promotion of Quality of Life in Taiwan

  • Te-Hsin LiangEmail author


The “e-Taiwan Program” implemented by Taiwan government is aimed at showing the e-advantage in people’s life and bring about essential benefits. This research follows the e-Life indicators of the Quality of Life measurement system developed by “e-Taiwan Program”, which including four major dimensions of e-Daily Life, e-Business, e-Government, Broadband to home. By using telephone interview, 3,024 respondents aged 15 and above were validly interviewed. In Taiwan, the cognition of e-Life service is high, and 71.4% of e-Life services have been well heard of by residents. Although the penetration of e-Life services is not as high as the degree of cognition; there are 31.3% of the e-Life services promoted by “e-Taiwan Program” has been used. The average score of overall quality of life promotion of e-Life is 63.9. It represents that, in general, people think their life has been slightly improved by e-Life services. Through stepwise regression analysis models, we found that most of Internet services usages will bring highly positive influence on the quality of life promotion, but the cognition and usage in e-Government usually bring negative influence on the quality of promotion.


Cognition e-Taiwan Internet service Quality of life Usage 



This research was funding by III (the Institute for Information Industry). The author also wishes to thank Miss. Jia-ling Peng for her assistance in the survey and cleaning data.


  1. Cairncross, F. (1997). The death of distance: How the communications revolution will change our lives. London: Orion.Google Scholar
  2. DiMaggio, P. E., Hargittai, W. R. N., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Review of Sociology, 27, 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ebeling-Witte, S., Frank, M. L., & Lester, D. (2007). Shyness, internet use, and personality. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 713–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fokkema, T., & Knipscheer, K. (2007). Escape loneliness by going digital, a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a Dutch experiment in using ECT to overcome loneliness among older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 11(5), 496–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Institute for Information Industry (III). (2004). 2004 Yearbook of information national powers (pp. 10–14). Taiwan: Science and Technology Advisory Group of Executive Yuan.Google Scholar
  6. Israel, B. (2000). Understanding the web, social, political, and economic dimensions of the Internet. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 931–933.Google Scholar
  7. Lei, L., & Wu, Y. (2007). Adolescents’ paternal attachment and internet use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 633–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Limayem, M., Khalifa, M., & Frini, A. (2000). What makes consumers buy from internet? A longitudinal study of online shopping. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(4), 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nahm, E. S., & Resnick, B. (2001). Homebound older adults’ experiences with the internet and e-mail. Computers in Nursing, 19(6), 257–263.Google Scholar
  10. National Information and Communication Initiative (NICI). (2005) Introduction of e-Taiwan program. Retrieved 15 October 2008, from
  11. Peng, T. Q., & Zhu, J. J. H. (2008). Cohort trends in perceived internet influence on political efficacy in Hong Kong. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Quality of Life Survey of New Zealand. (2005) Quality of life survey of New Zealand––Prepared for quality of life project team and ministry of social development. Retrieved 2 June 2007, from
  13. Sánchez-Franco, M. J., & Roldán, J. L. (2005). Web acceptance and usage model: A comparison between goal-directed and experiential web users. Internet Research, 15(1), 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schiffman, L. G., Sherman, E., & Long, M. M. (2003). Toward a better understanding of the interplay of personal values and the internet. Psychology & Marketing, 20(2), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sirgy, M. J., Lee, D. J., & Bae, J. (2006). Developing a measure of internet well-being, nomological (predictive) validation. Social Indicators Research, 78, 205–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Taiwan Institute of Economic Research (TIER). (2006). The survey of quality of e-Life indicators and measurement system-concise report. Taiwan: Institute for Information Industry.Google Scholar
  17. Taiwan Network Information Center (TWNIC). (2008) Internet broadband and usage in Taiwan-a summary report of the Jan survey of 2008, Taiwan. Retrieved 15 October 2009, from
  18. The Audit Commission. (2005). Local quality of life indicators––Supporting local communities to become sustainable: A guide to local monitoring to complement the indicators in the UK government sustainable development strategy. Retrieved 15 October 2007, from
  19. White, H., Mcconnell, E., Clipp, E., Branch, L. G., Sloane, R., Pieper, C., et al. (2002). A randomized controlled trial of the psychosocial impact of providing internet training and access to older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 6(3), 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Information ScienceFu Jen Catholic UniversityXinzhuang CityTaiwan, Republic of China

Personalised recommendations