Quality of Life and Leisure Activities: How do Leisure Activities Contribute to Subjective Well-Being?
- 3.6k Downloads
The quality of life is determined with objective factors and also with subjective perception of factors which influence human life. Leisure activities play a very important role in subjective well-being because they provide opportunities to meet life values and needs. Through participation in leisure activities people build social relationships, feel positive emotions, acquire additional skills and knowledge, and therefore improve their quality of life. In this report we will explore how leisure activities improve subjective well-being. We will try to distinguish among different types of leisure activities and find those which contribute more to the subjective well-being. Particularly, we will explore which leisure activities contribute to the subjective well-being of women and men of different age. Our study is based on data from a representative sample of Croatian citizens (N = 4,000), who estimated their subjective well-being and participation in various leisure activities. First, we will describe the subjective well-being of various groups of people who differ by gender and age. Afterward, we will identify important leisure activities which determine subjective well-being across age and gender groups. Overall, our results show that engagement in leisure activities contributes to subjective well being, while the pattern of important leisure activities somewhat varies across different age and gender groups.
KeywordsLeisure activities Subjective well-being Quality of life Age Gender
- Auld, C., & Case, A. (1997). Social exchange processes in leisure and non-leisure settings: A review and exploratory investigation. Journal of Leisure Research, 29, 183–200.Google Scholar
- Bejaković, P., & Kaliterna Lipovčan, L. J. (2007). Quality of life in Croatia: Key findings from national research. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
- Cummins, R. A. (2002). International wellbeing index, version 2. Retrived May 8, 2008, from http://acqol.deakin.edu.au/inter_wellbeing/Index-CoreItemsDraft2.doc.
- Eurostat. (2009). Youth in Europe. A statistical portrait. Luxembourg: European Communities.Google Scholar
- Fukumoto, N., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2002). A study of relationship between leisure and life satisfaction of the elderly. Bulletin of the Faculty of Human Development, 9(2), 419–425.Google Scholar
- Henderson, K. A., Hodges, S., & Kivel, B. D. (2002). Context and dialogue in research on women and leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(3), 253–271.Google Scholar
- Kaliterna Lipovčan, L. J., & Prizmić-Larsen, Z. (2006). Kvaliteta življenja, životno zadovoljstvo i osjećaj sreće u Hrvatskoj i europskim zemljama. [Quality of life, life satisfaction and happiness in Croatia in comparison to European countries]. In K. Ott (Ed.), Pridruživanje Hrvatske Europskoj uniji. Izazovi sudjelovanja (pp. 181–198). Zagreb: Institut za javne financije & Zaklada Friedrich Ebert.Google Scholar
- Lemon, B. W., Bengtson, V. L., & Peterson, J. A. (1972). An exploration of the activity theory of aging: Activity types and life satisfaction among in-movers to a retirement community. Journal of Gerontology, 27, 511–523.Google Scholar
- Passmore, A., & French, D. (2001). Development and administration of a measure to assess adolescents’ participation in leisure activities. Adolescence, 36(141), 67–75.Google Scholar
- Raboteg-Šarić, Z., Sakoman, S., & Brajša-Žganec, A. (2002). Stilovi roditeljskog odgoja, slobodno vrijeme i rizično ponašanje mladih. [Parental child-rearing styles, leisure time activities and adolescent risk behaviour]. Društvena istraživanja, 58–59, 239–263.Google Scholar
- Scott, D., & Willits, F. K. (1998). Adolescent and adult leisure patterns: A Reassessment. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(3), 319–330.Google Scholar
- Shinew, K. J., Floyd, M. F., McGuire, F. A., & Noe, F. P. (1996). Class polarization and leisure activity preferences of African Americans: Intragroup comparison. Journal of Leisure Research, 28(4), 219–232.Google Scholar