Social Indicators Research

, Volume 101, Issue 3, pp 405–418 | Cite as

The Subjective Wellbeing of High-School Students: Validating the Personal Wellbeing Index—School Children

Article

Abstract

The Personal Wellbeing Index—School Children (PWI-SC) is designed as a parallel form of the adult PWI-A, to measure subjective wellbeing. This study examines the psychometric properties of the PWI-SC. Data from 351 students, aged between 12 and 20 years, were collected by two independent studies over the years 2005–2006. Using the combined data, the results indicate good psychometric properties for the PWI-SC. It is also found that females have higher SWB but that both genders show an age-related decline in SWB from early to mid adolescence. Notably, School satisfaction meets the criteria for a new domain for the PWI-SC and should be considered for inclusion in a future revision of the scale. The use of the PWI-SC in schools can provide important information for the development of educational policy.

Keywords

Subjective wellbeing Adolescents Personal Wellbeing Index High-school Students 

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative guide to the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and TRF profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, J. (1999). Teacher-student interaction in urban at-risk classrooms: Differential behaviour, relationship quality, and student satisfaction with school. The Elementary School Journal, 100(1), 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casas, F., Malo, S., Bataller, S., González, M., & Figuer, C. (2009a). Personal well-being among 12 to 18 year-old adolescents and Spanish university students, evaluated through the Personal Well-Being Index (PWI). Conference presentation. International Society for Quality of Life Studies. Florence, July 19–23.Google Scholar
  4. Casas, F., Baltatescu, S., González, M., & Hatos, A. (2009b). Similarities and differences in the PWI of Romanian and Spanish adolescents aged 1316 years-old. Conference presentation. International Society for Quality of Life Studies. Florence, July 19–23.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the trail of the gold standard for subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. D. L. (2005). Personal Wellbeing Index—School Children (PWI-SC) (3rd ed.). Melbourne: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  10. Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Gibson, A., Weinberg, M., Collard, J., & Chester, M. (2009). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Survey 21. The wellbeing of AustraliansGambling, chocolate and swine flu. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University.Google Scholar
  12. Davern, M., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective Wellbeing as an affective-cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective wellbeing: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global judgements of subjective wellbeing: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65(3), 245–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanestad, B. R., & Albrektsen, G. (1992). The stability of quality of life experience in people with Type 1 diabetes over a period of a year. Journal of Advances Nursing, 17, 777–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Headey, B. (2010). The set point theory of well-being has serious flaws: On the eve of a scientific revolution? Social Indicators Research, 97, 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective wellbeing: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective wellbeing. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
  21. Holloway, J. (2003). Neighbourhood Subjective Wellbeing and the role of perceived control in maintaining wellbeing. Unpublished honours thesis, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.Google Scholar
  22. Huebner, E. S., Gilman, R., & Laughlin, J. E. (1999). A multimethod investigation of the multidimensionality of children’s wellbeing reports: Discriminant validity of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Social Indicators Research, 46, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult (PWI-A).Google Scholar
  24. Jin, S.-U., & Moon, S. M. (2006). A study of wellbeing and school satisfaction among academically talented students attending a science high school in Korea. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keyes, C. L. M. (2006). Mental health in adolescence: Is America’s youth flourishing? The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ng, Y. K. (1997). A case for happiness, cardinalsim, and interpersonal comparability. The Economic Journal, 107, 1848–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  29. Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55(1), 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Piers, E. V. (1986). The Piers-Harris Children’s Self-Concept Scale. Revised manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  31. Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image (rev. ed.).Google Scholar
  32. Sawyer, M. G., Arney, F. M., Baghurst, P. A. Clark, J. J., Graetz, B. W., Kosky, R. J., Nurcombe, B., Patton, G. C., Prior, M. R., Raphael, B., Rey, J., Whaites, L. C., & Zubrick, S. R. (2000). The mental health of young people in Australia. Mental Health and Special Programs Branch, Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care.Google Scholar
  33. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgement and a stable personality characteristic: Use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70(3), 345–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scollon, C. N., & Diener, E. (2006). Love, work and changes in extraversion and neuroticism over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1152–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. SPSS for Windows: Release 17.0. (2008). Chicago: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Suldo, S. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2004). The role of self-efficacy in adolescents subjective wellbeing. Poster session presented at the International Positive Psychology Summit, Washington, DC, October 1, 2004.Google Scholar
  38. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  39. Thompson, S. C., Thomas, C., Rickabaraugh, C. A., Tantamjarik, P., Otsuki, T., Pan, D., et al. (1998). Primary and secondary control over age-related changes in physical appearance. Journal of Personality, 66(4), 583–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wills, E. (2009). Spirituality and subjective well-being: Evidences for a new domain in the Personal Well-being Index. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(1), 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health Sciences, Discipline of PsychologyRMIT UniversityBundooraAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychologyDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations