The Relationship Between Hope, Eustress, Self-Efficacy, and Life Satisfaction Among Undergraduates
- 4k Downloads
The construct of eustress was studied alongside hope and self-efficacy, to explore how these constructs are related to life satisfaction among undergraduates. Questionnaires were administered to undergraduates to test the hypotheses that (1) as eustress levels increase, so will life satisfaction levels; (2) when eustress, hope, and self-efficacy are examined together, they will predict life satisfaction better than eustress alone; (3) eustress, hope, and self-efficacy will all be positively correlated with life satisfaction; and (4) self-efficacy will be the most positively correlated with life satisfaction. The results revealed a significant positive correlation between eustress and life satisfaction. A Hierarchical Linear Regression analysis revealed significant results supporting hypotheses 2 and 3, but not hypothesis 4. Results indicated that hope is the best predictor of life satisfaction. The work reported provides a reliable tool for measuring eustress, examines eustress in a new way at the academic level, and provides helpful information about student wellness to college administrators.
KeywordsEustress Hope Self-efficacy Life satisfaction Well-being
- Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 307–337). Retrieved in December 2008 from http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/014-BanduraGuide2006.pdf.
- Benson, H., & Allen, R. (1980). How much stress is too much? Harvard Business Review, 58, 86–92.Google Scholar
- Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). The hopeful optimist. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 288–290.Google Scholar
- Lovallo, W. (1997). Stress & health: Biological and psychological interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- McGowan, J., Gardner, G., & Fletcher, R. (2006). Positive and negative affective outcomes of occupational stress. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35, 92–98.Google Scholar
- Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.Google Scholar
- Selye, H. (1975). Stress without distress. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Publishing.Google Scholar
- Simmons, B. (2000). Eustress at work: Accentuating the positive. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University. Retrieved November 22nd, 2008, from the Claremont Colleges Library Database.Google Scholar
- Tennen, H., Afteck, G., & Tennen, R. (2002). Clipped feathers: The theory and measurement of hope. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 311–317.Google Scholar
- Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Williams, J., & Coombs, T. (1996). An analysis of the reliability and validity of Bandura’s multidimensional scales of perceived self-efficacy. Annual meeting of the american educational research association. Retrieved April 24th, 2009 from the Claremont Colleges Library Database.Google Scholar