Social Indicators Research

, Volume 100, Issue 2, pp 185–207 | Cite as

The Eudaimonic and Hedonic Components of Happiness: Qualitative and Quantitative Findings

  • Antonella Delle Fave
  • Ingrid Brdar
  • Teresa Freire
  • Dianne Vella-Brodrick
  • Marié P. Wissing
Article

Abstract

This paper illustrates a new project developed by a cross-country team of researchers, with the aim of studying the hedonic and eudaimonic components of happiness through a mixed method approach combining both qualitative and quantitative analyses. Data were collected from 666 participants in Australia, Croatia, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and South Africa. A major aim of the study was to examine definitions and experiences of happiness using open-ended questions. Among the components of well-being traditionally associated with the eudaimonic approach, meaning in particular was explored in terms of constituents, relevance, and subjective experience. The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) was also administered to quantitatively assess the hedonic dimension of happiness. Results showed that happiness was primarily defined as a condition of psychological balance and harmony. Among the different life domains, family and social relations were prominently associated with happiness and meaningfulness. The quantitative analyses highlighted the relationship between happiness, meaningfulness, and satisfaction with life, as well as the different and complementary contributions of each component to well-being. At the theoretical and methodological levels, findings suggest the importance of jointly investigating happiness and its relationship with other dimensions of well-being, in order to detect differences and synergies among them.

Keywords

Happiness Meaning Satisfaction with life Life domains Mixed-method approach 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to José Luis Zaccagnini (University of Malaga, Spain) and Stefan Engeser (Technische Institut, Munich, Germany), for their essential contribution in data collection and for their active participation in the coding phase of this study. We thank Marta Bassi (University of Milano, Italy) for her precious collaboration in different phases of the research work. We also thank our collaborators who helped in the coding process: Petra Anic, David Brodrick, Heleen Coetzee, Rocco Coppa, Carla Fonte, Isabel Lima and Michael Temane.

References

  1. Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health - How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F. (2005). The cultural animal: Human nature, meaning, and social life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chamberlain, K., & Zika, S. (1988). Measuring meaning in life: An examination of three scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 589–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chenyang, L. (2008). The ideal of harmony in ancient Chinese and Greek philosophy. Dao, 7, 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christopher, J. C. (1999). Situating psychological well-being: Exploring the cultural roots of its theory and research. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 141–152.Google Scholar
  6. Christopher, J. C., & Hickinbottom, S. (2008). Positive psychology, ethnocentrism, and the disguised ideology of individualism. Theory and Psychology, 18(5), 563–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Massimini, F. (1985). On the psychological selection of bio-cultural information. New Ideas in Psychology, 3, 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Engeser, S., Vella-Brodrick, D., Wissing, M., et al. (2008). Eudaimonic happiness and the eudaimonic happiness inventory (EHI): A cross-cultural investigation. In Roundtable discussant and presenter at the 4th European conference of posiitive psychology, book of abstracts (pp. 99–100). Opatija, Croatia (July 1–4).Google Scholar
  12. Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (2004). Bringing subjectivity into focus: Optimal experiences, life themes and person-centred rehabilitation. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 581–597). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (2005). The relevance of subjective well-being to social policies: Optimal experience and tailored intervention. In F. Huppert, B. Keverne, & N. Baylis (Eds.), The science of well-being (pp. 379–404). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Early, P. C. (1997). Face, harmony and social structure: An analysis of organizational behaviour across cultures. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ferriss, A. L. (2002). Does material well-being affect non-material well-being? Social Indicators Research, 60, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fredrickson, B. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Furnham, A., & Cheng, C. (2000). Lay theories of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giannantoni, G. (1976). Profilo di storia della filosofia. Vol.1: La Filosofia Antica. [History of philosophy. Vol.1: Ancient philosophy]. Torino: Loescher.Google Scholar
  23. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  24. Grouzet, F. M. E., Kasser, T., Ahuvia, A., Dols, J. M. F., et al. (2005). The structure of goal content across 15 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 800–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ho, S. S. M., & Chan, R. S. Y. (2009). Social harmony in Hong Kong: Level, determinants and policy implications. Social Indicators Research, 91, 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Research, 43, 207–222.Google Scholar
  28. Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(3), 539–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keyes, C. L. M. (2006). Subjective well-being in mental health and human development research worldwide: An introduction. Social Indicators Research, 77, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keyes, C. L. M. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62(2), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim, M. S., Kim, H. W., Cha, K. H., & Lim, J. (2007). What makes Koreans happy? Exploration on the structure of happy life among Korean adults. Social Indicators Research, 82(2), 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leung, K., Tremain Koch, P., & Lu, L. (2002). A dualistic model of harmony and its implications for conflict management in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Osborne, G., & Hurling, R. (2009). Measuring happiness: The higher order factor structure of subjective and psychological well-being measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 878–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lu, L. (2001). Understanding happiness: A look into the Chinese folk psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2006). Individual-oriented and socially oriented cultural conceptions of subjective well-being: Conceptual analysis and scale development. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luborsky, M., & Sankar, A. (2006). Beyond Nuts and Bolts: Epistemological and cultural issues in the acceptance of advanced qualitative and mixed methods research. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
  37. Martin, M. W. (2008). Paradoxes of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Massimini, F., & Delle Fave, D. A. (2000). Individual development in a bio-cultural perspective. American Psychologist, 55(1), 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morgan, J., & Farsides, T. (2009). Measuring meaning in life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morling, B., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Defining and measuring harmony control. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Muñoz Sastre, M. T. (1998). Lay conceptions of well-being and rules used in well-being judgements among young, middle-aged, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 47, 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. National Institutes of Health—NIH. (2001). Towards higher levels of analyses: Progress and promise in research on social and cultural dimensions of health. Bethesda, MD: Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, NIH.Google Scholar
  43. Oishi, S. (2000). Goals as cornerstones of subjective well-being: Linking individuals and cultures. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 87–112). Cambridge, MA: Bradford.Google Scholar
  44. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. CA: Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  45. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Pflug, J. (2009). Folk theories of happiness: A cross-cultural comparison of conceptions of happiness in Germany and South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 92(3), 551–563.Google Scholar
  50. Richardson, F. C., & Guignon, C. B. (2008). Positive psychology and philosophy of social science. Theory and Psychology, 18(5), 605–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ryan, M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.Google Scholar
  52. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39.Google Scholar
  55. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  56. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sirgy, M. J., & Wu, J. (2009). The pleasant life, the engaged life, and the meaningful life: What about the balanced life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning of life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vella-Brodrick, D. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2009). Three ways to be happy: Pleasure, engagement, and meaning: Findings from Australian and US samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691.Google Scholar
  62. Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. The Journal Positive Psychology, 3(4), 234–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 41–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Bede Agocha, V., et al. (2010). The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. WHOQOL Group. (1998). The WHOQL assessment instrument: Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 1585–1596.Google Scholar
  66. WHOQOL Group. (2004). Can we identify the poorest quality of life? Assessing the importance of quality of life using the WHOQOL-100. Quality of Life Research, 13, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. WHOQOL Group. (2006). A cross-cultural study of spirituality, religion, and personal beliefs as components of quality of life. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1486–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonella Delle Fave
    • 1
  • Ingrid Brdar
    • 2
  • Teresa Freire
    • 3
  • Dianne Vella-Brodrick
    • 4
  • Marié P. Wissing
    • 5
  1. 1.Università degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.University of RijekaRijekaCroatia
  3. 3.University of MinhoBragaPortugal
  4. 4.Monash University, Caulfield CampusCaulfield EastAustralia
  5. 5.North-West University, Potchefstroom CampusPotchefstroomSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations