Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 100, Issue 1, pp 171–183 | Cite as

Participation and well-Being Among Older Adults Living with Chronic Conditions

  • Dana AnabyEmail author
  • William C. Miller
  • Janice J. Eng
  • Tal Jarus
  • Luc Noreau
  • PACC Research Group
Article

Abstract

This study explored the unique contribution of participation (daily activities and social roles) in explaining well-being of older adults living with chronic conditions and examined which aspect of participation (accomplishment of participation or satisfaction with participation) was more important in describing their well-being. Two hundred older adults with chronic conditions completed the following assessments: Satisfaction with Life Scale to measure well-being; Assessment of Life Habits to evaluate two aspects of participation: (a) accomplishment of daily activities and social roles and (b) level of satisfaction with participation; Interpersonal Support Evaluation List to assess level of social support and Affect Balance scale to measure level of balance confidence. In addition, participants’ level of mobility was assessed using the Timed Up and Go test. Regression analysis was performed. Results indicated that number of chronic conditions, social support and satisfaction with participation had a significant contribution to well-being and altogether explained 31% of its variance whereas accomplishment of participation did not play as significant role in the model. In conclusion, participation has a unique contribution to older adults’ well-being where satisfaction with participation rather than the accomplishment of activities is of importance. Additional aspects of participation and level of disability are key factors identified for further inquiry.

Keywords

Participation Well-being Social environment Chronic conditions Aging 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge operating funds from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the British Columbia Medical Services Foundation and salary support from CIHR (to Drs. Eng and Miller) and Michael Smith Foundation of Health Research (to Dr. Eng). Dana Anaby was supported by a Strategic Training Fellowship in Rehabilitation Research from the Canadian Institute of Health Research Musculoskeletal and Arthritis Institute.

References

  1. Anaby, D., Jarus, T., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of the Hebrew language version of the satisfaction with life scale. Social Indicators Research, 96, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anaby, D., Miller, W. C., Eng, J. J., Jarus, T., & Noreau, L. (2009). Can personal and environmental factors explain participation of older adults? Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1–8.Google Scholar
  3. AOTA. (2002). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 609–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrindell, W. A., Meeuwesen, L., & Huyse, F. J. (1991). The satisfaction with life scale (swls)—Psychometric properties in a non-psychiatric medical outpatients sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop, A. J., Martin, P., & Poon, L. (2006). Happiness and congruence in older adulthood: A structural model of life satisfaction. Aging & Mental Health, 10(5), 445–453.Google Scholar
  6. Cardol, M., Jong, B. A., Bos, G., Beelen, A., Groot, I. J. M., & Haan, R. J. (2002). Beyond disability: Perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, A. J., Gibson, B., & Robinson, P. G. (2001). Measuring quality of life: Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience? British Medical Journal, 322, 1240–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christiansen, C. H. (1999). Defining lives: Occupation as identity: An essay on competence, coherence, and the creation of meaning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53(6), 547–558.Google Scholar
  9. Chung, J. C. C. (2004). Activity participation and well-being of people with dementia in long-term-care settings. OTJR: Occupation, Participation & Health, 24, 22–31.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Hoberman, H. N. (1987). Measuring the functional components of social support. In I. Sarason & B. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 73–94). Nijhoff: Martinus.Google Scholar
  11. Cumming, E. (1961). Growing old, the process of disengagement. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Desrosiers, J., Noreau, L., Robichaud, L., Fougeyrollas, P., Rochette, A., & Viscogliosi, C. (2004a). Validity of the assessment of life habits in older adults. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine: Official Journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 36(4), 177–182.Google Scholar
  13. Desrosiers, J., Noreau, L., & Rochette, A. (2004b). Social participation of older adults in Quebec. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 16(5), 406–412.Google Scholar
  14. Desrosiers, J., Noreau, L., Rochette, A., Bourbonnais, D., Bravo, G., & Bourget, A. (2006). Predictors of long-term participation after stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(4), 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Desrosiers, J., Noreau, L., Rochette, A., Bravo, G., & Boutin, C. (2002). Predictors of handicap situations following post-stroke rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(15), 774–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E. (2000). The science of happiness and proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Domholdt, E. (2000). Physical therapy research: Principles and applications (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  20. Edward, D., & Christiansen, C. (2005). Occupational development. In C. Christiansen & C. M. Baum (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Performance, participation and well-being (pp. 42–63). NJ: Slack.Google Scholar
  21. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 28(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  22. Ferreira, V. M., & Sherman, A. M. (2007). The relationship of optimism, pain and social support to well-being in older adults with osteoarthritis. Aging & Mental Health, 11(1), 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fougeyrollas, P., Noreau, L., Bergeron, H., Cloutier, R., Dion, S. A., & St-Michel, G. (1998). Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: Conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21(2), 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freysinger, V. J., Alessio, H., & Mehdizadeh, S. (1993). Re-examining the morale-physical health-activity relationship: A longitudinal study of time changes and gender differences. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 17, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heitzman, C. A., & Kaplan, R. M. (1988). Assessment of methods for measuring social support. Health Psychology, 7, 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hendry, F., & Mcvittie, C. (2004). Is quality of life a healthy concept? Measuring and understanding life experiences of older people. Qualitative Health Research, 14(7), 961–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hershkovitz, A., & Brill, S. (2006). Get up and go—Home. Aging Clinical & Experimental Research, 18(4), 301–306.Google Scholar
  28. Jarus, T., Barnea, R. N., Waserlauf, L., Burtz, S., Yakoel, I., Gal-On, L., et al. (2005). The development of the Israeli Adults assessment of participation. The Israeli Journal of Occupational Therapy, 15, H93–H111.Google Scholar
  29. Krause, N. (2007). Longitudinal study of social support and meaning in life. Psychology and Aging, 22(3), 456–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Law, M. (2002). Participation in the occupations of everyday life. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 640–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levasseur, M., Desrosiers, J., & Noreau, L. (2004a). Is social participation associated with quality of life of older adults with physical disabilities? Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(2), 1206–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levasseur, M., Desrosiers, J., & Noreau, L. (2004b). Relationships between environment and quality of life of older adults with physical disabilities. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 22(3), 37–53.Google Scholar
  33. Lin, M., Hwang, H., Hu, M., Wu, H. I., Wang, Y., & Huang, F. (2004). Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach, and tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52(8), 1343–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mayo, N. E., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Cote, R., Durcan, L., & Carlton, J. (2002). Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(8), 1035–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Myers, A. M., Fletcher, P. C., Myers, A. H., & Sherk, W. (1998). Discriminative and evaluative properties of the activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 53(4), M287–M294.Google Scholar
  36. Ng, S. S., & Chan, C. W. (2005). The timed up & go test: Its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(8), 1641–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Noreau, L., Desrosiers, J., Robichaud, L., Fougeyrollas, P., Rochette, A., & Viscogliosi, C. (2004). Measuring social participation: Reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 346–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Noreau, L., Fougeyrollas, P., & Vincent, C. (2002). The LIFE-H: Assessment of the quality of social participation. Technology & Disability, 14, 113–118.Google Scholar
  39. Pang, M. Y. C., Eng, J. J., & Miller, W. C. (2007). Determinants of satisfaction with community reintegration in older adults with chronic stroke: Role of balance self-efficacy. Physical Therapy, 87(3), 282–291. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Powell, L. E., & Myers, A. M. (1995). The activities-specific balance confidence (abc) scale. Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 50(1), M28–M34.Google Scholar
  42. Rockwood, K., Howlett, S. E., MacKnight, C., Beattie, B. L., Bergman, H., Hebert, R., et al. (2004). Prevalence, attributes, and outcomes of fitness and frailty in community-dwelling older adults: Report from the Canadian study of health and aging. The Journals of Gerontology Series A. Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 59(12), 1310–1317.Google Scholar
  43. Sachs, D., & Josman, N. (2003). The activity card sort: A factor analysis. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 23, 165–174.Google Scholar
  44. Sprangers, M. A. G., de Regt, E. B., Andries, F., van Agt, H. M. E., Bijl, R. V., de Boer, J. B., et al. (2000). Which chronic conditions are associated with better or poorer quality of life? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(9), 895–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  46. Tombaugh, T. N., & Mcintyre, N. J. (1992). The mini-mental-state-examination—A comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40(9), 922–935.Google Scholar
  47. Van Campen, C., & Iedema, J. (2007). Are persons with physical disabilities who participate in society healthier and happier? Structural equation modeling of objective participation and subjective well-being. Quality of Life Research, 16(4), 635–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vassar, M. (2008). A note on the score reliability for the satisfaction with life scale: An RG study. Social Indicators Research, 86(1), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Whitney, J. C., Lord, S. R., & Close, J. (2005). Streamlining assessment and intervention in a falls clinic using the timed up and go test and physiological profile assessments. Age and Ageing, 34(6), 567–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. WHO. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  51. Wrosch, C., Bauer, I., & Scheier, M. F. (2005). Regret and quality of life across the adult life span: The influence of disengagement and available future goals. Psychology and Aging, 20(4), 657–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wrosch, C., Schulz, R., & Heckhausen, J. (2004). Health stresses and depressive symptomatology in the elderly: A control-process approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(1), 17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dana Anaby
    • 1
    Email author
  • William C. Miller
    • 2
  • Janice J. Eng
    • 3
  • Tal Jarus
    • 2
  • Luc Noreau
    • 4
  • PACC Research Group
  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of Occupational Science and Occupational TherapyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Department of Physical TherapyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.Department of RehabilitationLaval UniversityQuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations