Social Indicators Research

, Volume 100, Issue 1, pp 85–100 | Cite as

The Quality of School Life: Teacher-Student Trust Relationships and the Organizational School Context

Article
First Online:
Accepted:

Abstract

In exploring the quality of schools’ social system, this study provides insight into in which types of schools students may encounter barriers in developing supportive teacher-student relationships because of teachers exposing low levels of trust in students. Student culture and teachability perceptions are assessed as incentives for teachers’ perceptions of students’ trustworthiness. Information was gathered from 2,104 teachers across a representative sample of 84 secondary schools in Flanders (Belgium). A measure for trust in students was derived from the trust scales developed by Hoy and Tschannen-Moran. Multilevel analyses reveal that teacher perceptions of students’ teachability strongly predict teacher trust. This underscores the importance of teacher perceptions of students’ ability to meet the expectations imposed on them with regard to the formation of trust. Additionally, we show that teacher trust is affected by the organizational school context, although the academic orientation of the student culture plays no role.

Keywords

Trust Teacher Organizational context Teachability Student culture Intergenerational bonding 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams, C. M. (2008). Building trust in schools: A review of the empirical evidence. In W. K. Hoy & M. DiPaola (Eds.), Improving schools: Studies in leadership and culture (pp. 29–54). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Thompson, M. S. (1987). School performance, status relations, and the structure of sentiment: Bringing the teacher back in. American Sociological Review, 52, 665–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, H. S. (1968). Social-class variations in the teacher-pupil relationship. In R. R. Bell & H. R. Stub (Eds.), The sociology of education: A sourcebook (Revised Edition ed., pp. 155–166). Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, J. H., et al. (2004). Why we harass nerds and freaks: A formal theory of student culture and norms. The Journal of School Health, 74, 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blau, P. (1986). Exchange and power in social life (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brutsaert, H. (2001). Co-educatie. Studiekansen en kwaliteit van het schoolleven [Coeducation. Educational opportunities and the quality of school life]. Leuven/Apeldoorn, Belgium: Garant.Google Scholar
  8. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. E., & Holland, P. B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cochran-Smith, M., Shakman, K., Terrell, D. G., & McQuillan, P. (2009). Good and just teaching: The case for social justice in teacher education. American Journal of Education, 115, 347–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  12. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge (Mass.): Belknap press of Harvard university press.Google Scholar
  14. Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools. The Impact of Communities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Corten, R., & Dronkers, J. (2005). Schoolprestaties van leerlingen uit de lagere strata op openbare, bijzondere en privé-scholen: Een cross-nationale test van de Coleman & Hoffer-these [School performance of pupils from the lower strata in public, special and private schools: A cross-national test of the Coleman and Hoffer thesis]. Pedagogische Studiën, 82, 205–222.Google Scholar
  16. Croninger, R. G., & Lee, V. E. (2001). Social capital and dropping out of high school: Benefits to at-risk students of teachers’ support and guidance. Teachers College Record, 103, 548–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2004a). Intergenerational bonding in school: The behavioral and contextual correlates of student-teacher relationships. Sociology of Education, 11, 60–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crosnoe, R., Kirkpatrick, M., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2004b). School size and the interpersonal side of education: An examination of race/ethnicity and organizational context. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 1259–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Driessen, G. (2002). Sociaal-etnische schoolcompositie en onderwijsresultaten: Effecten van positie, concentratie en diversiteit [School social-ethnic composition and achievement: Effects of position, concentration, and diversity]. Pedagogische Studiën, 79, 212–230.Google Scholar
  20. Ennis, C. D., & McCauley, M. T. (2002). Creating urban classroom communities worthy of trust. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Portocarero, L. (1979). Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France and Sweden. British Journal of Sociology, 30, 415–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forsyth, P. B. (2008). The empirical consequences of school trust. In W. K. Hoy & M. DiPaola (Eds.), Improving schools: Studies in leadership and culture (pp. 1–28). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Freeman, D. J., Brookhart, S. M., & Loadman, W. E. (1999). Realities of teaching in racially/ethnically diverse schools: Feedback from entry-level teachers. Urban Education, 34, 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust trust. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and braking cooperative relations (pp. 213–237). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10, 601–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goddard, R. D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools. Elementary School Journal, 102, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goddard, R. D., Salloum, S. J., & Berebitsky, D. (2009). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between poverty, racial composition, and academic achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 292–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hallinan, M. T. (2008). Teacher influences on students’ attachment to school. Sociology of Education, 81, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harvey, D. G., & Slatin, G. T. (1975). The relationship between child’s SES and teacher expectations: A test of the middle-class bias hypothesis. Social Forces, 54, 140–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohavy, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures—A qualitative and quantitative study across 20 cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184–208.Google Scholar
  33. Huisman, M. (1999). Imputation of missing item responses: some simple techniques. In M. Huisman (Ed.), Item nonresponse: occurence, causes, and imputation of missing answers to test items (pp. 91–119). Leiden: DSWO press, Leiden University.Google Scholar
  34. Imber, S. (1973). Relationship of trust to academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ingersoll, R. M. (2005). The anomaly of educational organizations and the study of organizational control. In L. V. Hedges & B. Schneider (Eds.), The social organization of schooling (pp. 91–110). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  36. Kornblau, B. (1982). The teachable pupil survey: A technique for assessing teachers’ perceptions of pupil attributes. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 170–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kramer, R. M., Brewer, M. B., & Hanna, B. A. (1996). Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 357–389). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Lee, V. E. (2000). School size and the organization of secondary schools. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 327–344). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Lortie, D. C. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Meier, D. (2002). In schools we trust: Creating communities of learning in an era of testing and standardization. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  42. Merton, R. K. (1957). The role-set: Problems in sociological theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 8, 106–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitra, D. L. (2009). Collaborating with students: Building youth-adult partnerships in schools. American Journal of Education, 115, 407–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Newmann, F. M. (1981). Reducing student alienation in high schools: Implications for theory. Harvard Educational Review, 51, 546–564.Google Scholar
  45. Nieto, S. (2000). Placing equity front and center: Some thoughts on transforming teacher education for a new century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 180–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Opdenakker, M.-C., & Hermans, D. (2006). Allochtonen in en doorheen het onderwijs: cijfers, oorzaken en verklaringen [Foreigners in and through education: figures, causes and explanations]. In S. Sierens, M. Van Houtte, P. Loobuyck, K. Delrue, & K. Pelleriaux (Eds.), Onderwijs onderweg in de immigratiesamenleving [Education on the way in the immigration society] (pp. 33–66). Gent: Academia Press.Google Scholar
  47. Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70, 323–367.Google Scholar
  48. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  49. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical lineair models. Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.Google Scholar
  51. Saft, E. W., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Teachers’ perceptions of their relationships with students: Effects of child age, gender, and ethnicity of teachers and children. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sitkin, S., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organizational Science, 4, 367–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smyth, J. (2004). Social capital and the ‘socially just school’. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stanton-Salazar, R. (1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youths. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 1–40.Google Scholar
  56. Stevens, P. A. J. (2007). Exploring the importance of teachers’ institutional structure on the development of teachers’ standards of assessment in Belgium. Sociology of Education, 80, 314–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Talacchi, S. (1960). Organization size, individual attitudes and behavior: An empirical study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5, 398–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Talbert, J. E., McLaughlin, M. W., & Rowan, B. (1993). Understanding context effects on secondary school teaching. Teachers College Record, 95, 45–68.Google Scholar
  59. Tan, B. (1998). Blijvende sociale ongelijkheden in het Vlaamse onderwijs [Persistent social inequalities in Flemish education]. Tijdschrift voor Sociologie, 19, 169–197.Google Scholar
  60. Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference: Let’s be realistic. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Thrupp, M., & Lupton, R. (2006). Taking school contexts more seriously: The social justice challenge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 308–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Timmerman, C., Hermans, P., & Hoornaert, J. (2002). Allochtone Jongeren in het Onderwijs. Een Multidisciplinair Perspectief [Allochthonous youngsters in education. A multidisciplinary perspective]. Leuven-Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
  63. Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  64. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70, 547–593.Google Scholar
  65. Van Houtte, M. (2003). Reproductietheorieën getoest. De link tussen SES-compositie van de school en onderwijscultuur van leerkrachten en directie [Reproduction theories tested. The link between SES composition of the school and the academic culture of teachers and administration]. Mens en Maatschappij, 78, 547–593.Google Scholar
  66. Van Houtte, M. (2004). Gender context of the school and study culture, or how the presence of girls affects the achievement of boys. Educational Studies, 30, 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Van Houtte, M. (2005). Climate or culture? A plea for conceptual clarity in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Houtte, M. (2006). Tracking and teacher satisfaction: role of study culture and trust. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Houtte, M. (2007). Exploring teacher trust in technical/vocational secondary schools: Male teachers’ preference for girls. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 826–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Houtte, M., Stevens, P., Sels, A., Soens, K., & Van Rossem, R. (2005). De invloed van structurele en compositorische schoolkenmerken op prestaties en welbevinden van leerlingen in het secundair onderwijs: een verklaring via cultuur [The influence of structural and compositional school features on achievement and well-being of secondary school students. An explanation through culture]. (Unpublished report). Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University, Department of Sociology, Research Group on Youth, Education, and Gender.Google Scholar
  71. Van Maele, D., & Van Houtte, M. (2009). Faculty trust and organizational school characteristics: An exploration across secondary schools in Flanders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 556–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Van Petegem, K., Aelterman, A., Van Keer, H., & Rosseel, Y. (2008). The influence of student characteristics and interpersonal teacher behaviour in the classroom on student’s wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 85, 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Warrington, M., Younger, M., & Williams, J. (2000). Student attitudes, image and the gender gap. British Educational Research Journal, 26, 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour. How working class kids get working class jobs. Hants: Saxon House.Google Scholar
  75. Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior 8 (pp. 53–111). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations