Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 99, Issue 3, pp 443–453 | Cite as

Does Individual Secularism Promote Life Satisfaction? The Moderating Role of Societal Development

  • Liman Man Wai LiEmail author
  • Michael H. Bond
Article

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the link between values and life satisfaction, examining the role of culture in this process. Secularism was found to predict life satisfaction scores at a small but statistically very significant level in persons from all nations participating in all four waves of the World Values Survey. The direction and strength of this relationship was moderated, however, by the country’s human development index—people in low-HDI countries consistently showed a negative relationship between secularism and happiness across the four waves of the WVS; people in high-HDI countries initially showed a negative relationship between secularism and happiness in Waves 1 and 2, but a positive relationship between secularism and happiness in Waves 3 and 4. These results thus appear to support a “cultural fit” hypothesis consistently for persons in low HDI countries, and a transition towards a “cultural fit” for persons in HDI countries as data was collected across the four waves. By Wave 4, it is clear that citizens who endorse values consistent with their county’s developmental trajectory are more satisfied with their lives. This study demonstrates the amenability of the data collected by the World Values Survey to individual-level analysis of psychological process that is responsive to the shaping influence of variations in their nation’s societal characteristics.

Keywords

Life satisfaction Secular values Subjective well-being Human development index 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, M. W., Ng, S. H., Ikeda, K., Jawan, J. A., Sufi, A. H., Wilson, N., et al. (2007). Two decades of change in cultural values and economic development in eight East Asian and Pacific island nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. (1996). The meta-analysis of factor analyses: An illustration based on the cumulation of correlation matrices. Psychological Methods, 1, 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, P. L. (1999). The descularization of the world: A global overview. In P. Berger (Ed.), The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics (pp. 1–18). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, P., Davie, G., & Fokas, E. (2008). Religious America, secular Europe? A theme and variations. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Bernard, M. M., Gebauer, J. E., & Maio, G. R. (2006). Cultural estrangement: The role of personal and societal value discrepancies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boehnke, K., Stromberg, C., Regmi, M. P., Richmond, B. O., & Chandra, S. (1998). Reflecting the worlds “out there”: A cross-cultural perspective on worries, values and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 227–247.Google Scholar
  8. Bonini, A. N. (2008). Cross-national variation in individual life satisfaction: Effects of national wealth, human development, and environmental conditions. Social Indicators Research, 87, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davie, G. (1999). Europe: The exception that proves the rule? In P. Berger (Ed.), The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics (pp. 65–83). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  10. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 185–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ellison, C. G. (1991). Religious involvement and subjective well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halman, L., & Draulans, V. (2006). How secular is Europe? The British Journal of Sociology, 57, 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, culture change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jensen, J. P., & Bergin, A. E. (1988). Mental health values of professional therapists: A national interdisciplinary survey. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 290–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lai, J. H. W. (2004). How do values and social axioms affect the life satisfaction of Hong Kong Chinese? Unpublished Bachelor’s thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  18. Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2004). Culture and conceptions of happiness: Individual- oriented and social-oriented SWB. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pargament, K. I. (2002). The bitter and the sweet: An evaluation of the costs and benefits of religiousness. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Salmela-Aro, K., & Schoon, I. (2005). Introduction to the special section: Human development and well-being. European Psychologist, 10, 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V., & Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
  25. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Schwenka, S. (2000). Mysticism as a predictor of subjective well-being. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, P. B. (2004). Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Strupp, H. H. (1980). Humanism and psychotherapy: A personal statement of the therapist’s essential values. Psychotherapy, 17, 396–400.Google Scholar
  29. United Nations Development Programme. (2000). Human Development Report. http://www.undp.org.
  30. Veenhoven, R. (2005). If life getting better? How long and happily do people live in modern society? European Psychologist, 10, 330–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wulff, D. M. (1997). Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report. http://www.undp.org.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyChinese University of Hong KongHong Kong, S.A.R.China
  2. 2.Department of Applied Social SciencesHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations