Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 99, Issue 2, pp 205–225 | Cite as

Good Job, Good Life? Working Conditions and Quality of Life in Europe

  • Sonja DrobničEmail author
  • Barbara Beham
  • Patrick Präg
Article

Abstract

Cross-national comparisons generally show large differences in life satisfaction of individuals within and between European countries. This paper addresses the question of whether and how job quality and working conditions contribute to the quality of life of employed populations in nine strategically selected EU countries: Finland, Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, Germany, Portugal, Spain, Hungary, and Bulgaria. Using data from the European Quality of Life Survey 2003, we examine relationships between working conditions and satisfaction with life, as well as whether spillover or segmentation mechanisms better explain the link between work domain and overall life satisfaction. Results show that the level of life satisfaction varies significantly across countries, with higher quality of life in more affluent societies. However, the impact of working conditions on life satisfaction is stronger in Southern and Eastern European countries. Our study suggests that the issue of security, such as security of employment and pay which provides economic security, is the key element that in a straightforward manner affects people’s quality of life. Other working conditions, such as autonomy at work, good career prospects and an interesting job seem to translate into high job satisfaction, which in turn increases life satisfaction indirectly. In general, bad-quality jobs tend to be more ‘effective’ in worsening workers’ perception of their life conditions than good jobs are in improving their quality of life. We discuss the differences in job-related determinants of life satisfaction between the countries and consider theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

Keywords

Job quality Life satisfaction Quality of life Europe Cross-national comparison 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported in part by the European Commission Sixth Framework Programme Project “Quality of Life in a Changing Europe” (QUALITY), and the Network of Excellence “Reconciling Work and Welfare in Europe” (RECWOWE).

References

  1. Allardt, E. (1976). Dimensions of welfare in a comparative Scandinavian study. Acta Sociologica, 19, 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allardt, E. (1993). Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 88–94). Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anxo, D., & Boulin, J.-Y. (2006). The organization of time over the life course. European trends. European Societies, 8, 319–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aycan, Z., & Eskin, Z. (2005). Relative contribution of childcare, spousal, and organizational support in reducing work-family conflict for males and females. The case of Turkey. Sex Roles, 53, 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bedeian, A. G., Burke, B. G., & Moffett, R. G. (1988). Outcomes of work-family conflict among married male and female professionals. Journal of Management, 14, 475–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being u-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science and Medicine, 66, 1733–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Böhnke, P. (2008). Does society matter? Life satisfaction in the enlarged Europe. Social Indicators Research, 87, 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multi-dimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, A. (2001). What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data. Labor Economics, 8, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, A. (2005). What makes a good job? Evidence from OECD countries. In S. Bazen, C. Lucifora, & W. Salverda (Eds.), Job quality and employer behavior (pp. 11–30). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davoine, L., Erhel, C., & Guergoat-Lariviere, M. (2008). Monitoring quality in work: European employment strategy indicators and beyond. International Labour Review, 147, 164–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delhey, J. (2004). Life satisfaction in the enlarged Europe. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
  15. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 25, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. EQLS. (2003). European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions and Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. European Quality of Life Survey, 2003 [computer file]. (Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], February 2006. SN: 5260).Google Scholar
  17. Erikson, R. (1974). Welfare as a planning goal. Acta Sociologica, 17, 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erikson, R. (1993). Descriptions of inequality: The Swedish approach to welfare research. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 67–87). Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. European Commission. (2001). Employment and social policies: A framework for investing in quality. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  20. Fahey, T., & Smyth, E. (2004). Do subjective indicators measure welfare? Evidence from 33 European societies. European Societies, 6, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frone, M. R. (2003). Work-family balance. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 143–163). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Prevalence of work-family conflict. Are work and family boundaries asymmetrically permeable? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 723–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frone, M. R., Yardley, J. K., & Markel, K. S. (1997). Developing and testing an integrative model of the work–family interface. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gallie, D. (2002). The quality of working life in welfare strategy. In G. Esping-Andersen, D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck, & J. Myles (Eds.), Why we need a new welfare state (pp. 96–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gallie, D. (2007). Production regimes, employment regimes, and the quality of work. In D. Gallie (Ed.), Employment regimes and the quality of work (pp. 1–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gash, V., Mertens, A., & Gordo, L. R. (2007). Are fixed-term jobs bad for your health? A comparison of West Germany and Spain. European Societies, 9, 429–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Green, F. (2006). Demanding work. The paradox of job quality in the affluent economy. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: An international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75, 169–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ILO (1999). Decent work. (Report of the Director-General to the 87th Session of the International Labour Conference, Geneva).Google Scholar
  33. Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers. Employment relations in Transition. American Sociological Review, 74, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lambert, S. J. (1990). Processes linking work and family: A critical review and research agenda. Human Relations, 43, 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lance, C. E., Mallard, A. G., & Michalos, A. C. (1995). Tests of the causal directions of global–life facet satisfaction relationships. Social Indicators Research, 34, 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leitner, A., & Wroblewski, A. (2006). Welfare states and work–life balance. Can good practices be transferred from the Nordic countries to conservative welfare states? European Societies, 8, 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Noll, H.-H. (2004). Social indicators and quality of life research: Background, achievements, and current trends. In N. Genov (Ed.), Advances in sociological knowledge over half a century (pp. 151–181). Wiesbaden: VS.Google Scholar
  38. Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being. Evidence from the USA. Science, doi: 10.1126/science.1180606.
  39. Pichler, F., & Wallace, C. (2009). What are the reasons for differences in job satisfaction across Europe? Individual, compositional, and institutional explanations. European Sociological Review, 25, 535–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pleck, J. H. (1977). The work-family role system. Social Problems, 24, 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Präg, P., Guerreiro, M. d. D., Nätti, J., & Brookes, M. (2010a). Quality of work and quality of life of service sector workers. Cross-national variations in eight European countries. In M. Bäck-Wiklund, T. van der Lippe, L. den Dulk, & A. van Doorne-Huiskes (Eds.), Quality of work and life. Theory, practice, and policy. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  42. Präg, P., Mau, S., & Verwiebe, R. (2010b). Quality of life. In S. Mau & R. Verwiebe, European societies. Mapping structure and change. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rode, J. C., & Near, J. P. (2005). Spillover between work attitudes and overall life attitudes. Myth or reality? Social Indicators Research, 70, 79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Royuela, V., López-Tamayo, J., & Suriñach, J. (2008). The institutional vs. the academic definition of the quality of work life: What is the focus of the European commission? Social Indicators Research, 86, 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sirgy, J. (2002). The psychology of quality of life. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  46. Sirgy, M. J., Efraty, D., Siegel, P., & Lee, D.-J. (2001). A new measure of quality of work life (QWL) based on need satisfaction and spillover theories. Social Indicators Research, 55, 241–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Staines, G. (1980). Spillover versus compensation: A review of the literature on the relationship between work and nonwork. Human Relations, 33, 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Szücs, S., Drobnič, S., den Dulk, L., & Verwiebe, R. (2010). Quality of life and satisfaction with work-life balance. In M. Bäck-Wiklund, T. van der Lippe, L. den Dulk, & A. van Doorne-Huiskes (Eds.), Quality of work and life. Theory, practice, and policy. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  49. van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction research. Social Indicators Research, 37, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Verbakel, E., & DiPrete, T. (2008). The value of non-work time in cross-national quality of life comparisons: The case of the United States vs. the Netherlands. Social Forces, 87, 679–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wallace, C., Pichler, F., & Hayes, B. (2007). First European quality of life survey. Quality of work and life satisfaction. Luxembourg: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
  54. Wilensky, H. (1960). Work, careers, and social integration. International Social Science Journal, 12, 543–560.Google Scholar
  55. Zapf, W. (1984). Individuelle Wohlfahrt. Lebensbedingungen und wahrgenommene Lebensqualität [Individual welfare. Living conditions and perceived quality of life]. In W. Glatzer & W. Zapf (Eds.), Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik [Quality of life in the Federal Republic of Germany] (pp. 13–26). Frankfurt a. M. and New York: Campus.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HamburgHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations