Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 99, Issue 2, pp 301–313 | Cite as

Alegría! Flow in Leisure and Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Event Satisfaction Using Data from an Acrobatics Show

  • Lung Hung Chen
  • Yun-Ci Ye
  • Mei-Yen ChenEmail author
  • I-Wu Tung
Article

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to examine the role of satisfaction-with-event as a mediator in the relations between flow and life satisfaction based on the bottom-up theory (Andrews and Withey in Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. Plenum, New York, 1976; Lee et al. in J Macromarketing 22(2): 158–169, 2002). Four hundred and thirty-four participants with a mean age of 35.60 (SD = 11.76) were recruited from the audience of a “Cirque du Soleil” acrobatics show, performed in Taiwan in 2009. Participants completed the flow scale (Csikszentmihalyi in Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row, New York, 1990), a satisfaction-with-event scale (Lin and Hsu in Mark Rev 3(4): 497–528, 2008), and a satisfaction-with-life scale (Diener et al. in J Pers Assess 49:71–75, 1985) immediately after viewing the show. Structural equation modeling was conducted to examine our hypothesis that satisfaction-with-event levels would fully mediate the relationship between flow and overall life satisfaction. Results supported our prediction and are discussed in terms of bottom-up theory. Implications of the study are also provided for the leisure managers.

Keywords

Positive psychology Well-being Eudemonism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by a grant form the National Science Council (NSC98-2410-H179-005) to Mei-Yen Chen. We are also grateful for the anonymous reviewer’s insightful comments for our manuscript.

References

  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  2. Asakawa, K. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in daily life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 123–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barclay, D. W., Thompson, R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Journal of Technology Studies, 2(2), 285–309.Google Scholar
  5. Brief, A. P., Butcher, A. H., George, J. M., & Link, K. E. (1993). Integrating bottom-up and top-down theories of subjective well-being: The case of health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 646–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryant, R. M., & Constantine, M. G. (2006). Multiple role balance, job satisfaction, and life satisfaction in women school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 9(4), 265–271.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, L.-C. (2003). Relationship among demographic variables, flow experience, leisure satisfaction and life satisfaction of elder adults in nursing Home Unpublished master’s thesis. National Dong Hwa University, Hualien, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, L. H., & Kee, Y. H. (2008). Gratitude and adolescent athletes’ well-being. Social Indicators Research, 89(2), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, L. H., Tsai, Y. M., & Chen, M. Y. (2010). Psychometric analysis of the orientations to happiness questionnaire in Taiwanese undergraduate students. Social Indicators Research (in press).Google Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention (1st ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R. E. (1990). The art of seeing: An interpretation of the aesthetic encounter. Malibu, CA; Los Angeles. CA: J.P. Getty Museum; Getty Center for Education in the Arts.Google Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Headey, B., Veenhoven, R., & Wearing, A. (1991). Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 24(1), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heller, D., Perunovic, W. Q. E., & Reichman, D. (2009). The future of person-situation integration in the interface between traits and goals: A bottom-up framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang, C.-Y., & Carleton, B. (2003). The relationships among leisure participation, leisure satisfaction, and life satisfaction of college students in Taiwan. Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness, 1(2), 129–132.Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, S. A., Martin, A. J., & Eklund, R. C. (2008). Long and short measures of flow: The construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 561–587.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, C. D., Hollenhorst, S. J., Perna, F., & Selin, S. (2000). Validation of the flow theory in an on-site whitewater kayaking setting. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(2), 247–261.Google Scholar
  21. Kaplanidou, K., & Vogt, C. (2007). The interrelationship between sport event and destination image and sport tourists’ behaviours. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 12(3/4), 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lance, C. E., Lautenschlage, G. J., Sloan, C. E., & Varca, P. E. (1989). A comparison between bottom-up, top-down, and bidirectional models of relationships between global and life facet satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 57(3), 601–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, D. J., Sirgy, M. J., Larsen, V., & Wright, N. D. (2002). Developing a subjective measure of consumer well-being. Journal of Macromarketing, 22(2), 158–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leonardi, F., Spazzafumo, L., & Marcellini, F. (2005). Subjective well-being: The constructionist point of view. A longitudinal study to verify the predictive power of top-down effects and bottom-up processes. Social Indicators Research, 70(1), 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leonardi, F., Spazzafumo, L., Marcellini, F., & Gagliardi, C. (1999). The top-down/bottom-up controversy from a constructionist approach: A method for measuring top-down effects applied to a sample of older people. Social Indicators Research, 48(2), 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin, L. Y., & Hsu, T. W. (2008). A study on the relationship between performance quality, service quality, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. Marketing Review, 3(4), 497–528.Google Scholar
  27. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacCallum, R., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marsh, H. W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(4), 335–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mossholder, K. W., Bennet, N., Kemery, E. R., & Wesolowski, M. A. (1998). Relationships between bases of power and work reactions: The mediational role of procedural justice. Journal of Management, 24(4), 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (p. xviii, 829 p). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peterson, C., Ruch, W., Beermann, U., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rice, R. W., Near, J. P., & Hunt, R. G. (1980). The job-satisfaction/life-satisfaction relationship: A review of empirical research. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1(1), 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rich, G. J. (2001). Positive psychology: An introduction. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41(1), 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rode, J., Rehg, M., Near, J., & Underhill, J. (2007). The effect of work/family conflict on intention to quit: The mediating roles of job and life satisfaction. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2(2), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scherpenzeel, A., & Saris, W. (1996). Causal direction in a model of life satisfaction: The top-down/bottom-up controversy. Social Indicators Research, 38(2), 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sheldon, K. M., & King, L. (2001). Why positive psychology is necessary. American Psychologist, 56(3), 216–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tokar, D. M., & Jome, L. M. (1998). Masculinity, vocational interests, and career choice traditionality: Evidence for a fully mediated model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(4), 424–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vella-Brodrick, D., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2009). Three ways to be happy: Pleasure, engagement, and meaning—Findings from Australian and US samples. Social Indicators Research, 90(2), 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu, C. H. (2008). The role of perceived discrepancy in satisfaction evaluation. Social Indicators Research, 88, 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu, C. H., Chen, L. H., & Tsai, Y. M. (2009a). Investigating important weighting of satisfaction score from formative model with partial least squares analysis. Social Indicators Research, 90, 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wu, C. H., Chen, L. H., & Tsai, Y. M. (2009b). Longitudinal invariance analysis of the satisfaction with life scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 396–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the satisfaction with life scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1259–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2008). Psychometric analysis of the short-form UCLA loneliness scale (ULS-8) in Taiwanese undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1762–1771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lung Hung Chen
    • 1
  • Yun-Ci Ye
    • 2
  • Mei-Yen Chen
    • 3
    Email author
  • I-Wu Tung
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of Physical EducationNational Taiwan Sport UniversityKueishanTaiwan, ROC
  3. 3.Department of Recreation and Leisure Industry ManagementNational Taiwan Sport UniversityKueishanTaiwan, ROC
  4. 4.Department of Leisure ManagementTungnan UniversityShenKeng, TaipeiTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations