Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Environmental Influences on Well-Being: A Dyadic Latent Panel Analysis of Spousal Similarity

Abstract

This article uses dyadic latent panel analysis (DLPA) to examine environmental influences on well-being. DLPA requires longitudinal dyadic data. It decomposes the observed variance of both members of a dyad into a trait, state, and an error component. Furthermore, state variance is decomposed into initial and new state variance. Total observed similarity between members of a dyad is decomposed into trait similarity, initial state similarity, new state similarity, and error similarity. Dyadic similarity in new state variance reveals that both members of a dyad change in the same direction, which is a strong indication of environmental effects. DLPA is used to examine environmental influences on life satisfaction and domain satisfaction based on 22 annual assessments of married couples in the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (N’s = 607–740). The results show high similarity in new state variance for life satisfaction and objectively identical domains (household income, housing), and less similarity for objectively less similar domains (recreation, health). This finding provides strong evidence for environmental influences on well-being. In addition, the results show high trait similarity. The implications of the latter finding for interpretation of behavioral genetics studies of well-being are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    An annotated Mplus syntax file is available from the first author upon request.

References

  1. Alley, T. R. (1993). The developmental stability of facial attractiveness: New longitudinal data and a review. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(2), 265–278.

  2. Bookwala, J., & Schulz, R. (1996). Spousal similarity in subjective well-being: The cardiovascular health study. Psychology and Aging, 11(4), 582–590.

  3. Casas, F., Coenders, G., Cummins, R. A., Gonzalez, M., Figuer, C., & Malo, S. (2008). Does subjective well-being show a relationship between parents and their children? Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(2), 197–205.

  4. Caspi, A., Herbener, E., & Ozer, D. (1992). Shared experiences and the similarity of personalities: A longitudinal study of married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 281–291.

  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  6. Cole, D. A., Martin, N. C., & Steiger, J. H. (2005). Empirical and conceptual problems with longitudinal trait-state models: Introducing a trait-state-occasion model. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 3–20.

  7. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.

  8. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-being for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

  9. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314.

  10. Eaves, L. J., Fulker, D. W., & Heath, A. C. (1989). The effects of social homogamy and cultural inheritance on the covariances of twins and their parents: A LISREL model. Behavior Genetics. Special Issue: Twin methodology using LISREL, 19(1), 113–122.

  11. Ehrhardt, J. J., Saris, W. E., & Veenhoven, R. (2000). Stability of life-satisfaction over time: Analysis of change in ranks in a national population. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 177–205.

  12. Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: A meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 226–235.

  13. Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 158–164.

  14. Headey, B., Veenhoven, R., & Wearing, A. (1991). Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 24(1), 81–100.

  15. Heath, A. C., & Eaves, L. J. (1985). Resolving the effects of phenotype and social background on mate selection. Behavior Genetics, 15(1), 15–30.

  16. Heise, D. R. (1969). Separating reliability and stability in test–retest correlation. American Sociological Review, 34(1), 93–101.

  17. Kenny, D. A. (1975). Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness. Psychological Bulletin, 82(6), 887–903.

  18. Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (1995). The trait state error model for multiwave data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(1), 52–59.

  19. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2004). Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15(1), 8–13.

  20. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628.

  21. Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). How stable is happiness? Using the STARTS model to estimate the stability of life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(5), 1091–1098.

  22. Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186–189.

  23. McCartney, K., Harris, M. J., & Bernieri, F. (1990). Growing up and growing apart: A developmental meta-analysis of twin studies. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 226–237.

  24. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

  25. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (Fourth Edition ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  26. Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. NATO ASI Series D: Behavioural and Social Sciences, 67(496).

  27. Nes, R. B., Roysamb, E., Tambs, K., Harris, J. R., & Reichborn-Kjennerud, T. (2006). Subjective well-being: Genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change. Psychological Medicine, 36(7), 1033–1042.

  28. Ormel, J., & Rijsdijk, F. V. (2000). Continuing change in neuroticism during adulthood: Structural modelling of a 16-year, 5-wave community study. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(3), 461–478.

  29. Ormel, J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1991). Stability and change in psychological distress and their relationship with self-esteem and locus of control: A dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 288–299.

  30. Reynolds, C. A., Baker, L. A., & Pedersen, N. L. (1996). Models of spouse similarity: Applications to fluid ability measured in twins and their spouses. Behavior Genetics, 26(2), 73–88.

  31. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. McGraw Hill series in social psychology (p. 286). New York, NY, UK: Mcgraw Hill Book Company.

  32. Roysamb, E., Harris, J. R., Magnus, P., Vitterso, J., & Tambs, K. (2002). Subjective well-being: Sex-specific effects of genetic and environmental factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(2), 211–223.

  33. Rudinger, G., & Rietz, C. (1998). The neglected time dimension? Introducing a real longitudinal model: Testing latent growth curves, stability, and reliability as time-bound processes. Methods of Psychological Research. Special Issue: Analysis of longitudinal data, 3(2), 109–130.

  34. Saris, W. E., Van Wijk, T., & Scherpenzeel, A. (1998). Validity and reliability of subjective social indicators—the effect of different measures of association. Social Indicators Research, 45(1–3), 173–199.

  35. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74.

  36. Schilling, O. (2006). Development of life satisfaction in old age: Another view on the “Paradox”. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 241–271.

  37. Schimmack, U. (2009). Well-being: Measuring wellbeing in the SOEP. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 129, 1–9.

  38. Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (2003). Predictive validity of explicit and implicit self-esteem for subjective well being. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(2), 100–106.

  39. Schimmack, U., & Lucas, R. E. (2007). Marriage matters: Spousal similarity in life satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 127, 1–7.

  40. Schimmack, U., & Oishi, S. (2005). The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 395–406.

  41. Schimmack, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2008). The influence of environment and personality on the affective and cognitive component of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 89, 41–60.

  42. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 199–223.

  43. Schneider, L., & Schimmack, U. (2009). Self-informant agreement in well-being ratings: A meta-analysis. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9440-y.

  44. Silventoinen, K., Kaprio, J., Lahelma, E., Viken, R. J., & Rose, R. J. (2003). Assortative mating by body height and BMI: Finnish twins and their spouses. American Journal of Human Biology, 15(5), 620–627.

  45. Spotts, E. L., Neiderhiser, J. M., Towers, H., Hansson, K., Lichtenstein, P., Cederblad, M., et al. (2004). Genetic and environmental influences on marital relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(1), 107–119.

  46. Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., & Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389–408.

  47. Stubbe, J. H., Posthuma, D., Boomsma, D. I., & De Geus, E. J. C. (2005). Heritability of life satisfaction in adults: A twin-family study. Psychological Medicine, 35(11), 1581–1588.

  48. Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare, happiness, and ethics. Oxford: Claredon Press.

  49. Tambs, K., & Moum, T. (1992). No large convergence during marriage for health, lifestyle, and personality in a large sample of Norwegian spouses. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 54(4), 957–971.

  50. Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the multidimensional personality questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

  51. Tesser, A. (1993). The importance of heritability in psychological research: The case of attitudes. Psychological Review, 100(1), 129–142.

  52. Tower, R. B., & Kasl, S. V. (1996). Depressive symptoms across older spouses: Longitudinal influences. Psychology and Aging, 11(4), 683–697.

  53. Veenhoven, R. (1994). Is happiness a trait? Tests of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier. Social Indicators Research, 32(2), 101–160.

  54. Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2006). Enhancing the power of household panel studies—the case of the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP). DIW data documentation no. 13.

  55. Walker, S. S., & Schimmack, U. (2008). Validity of a happiness implicit association test as a measure of subjective well being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(2), 490–497.

  56. Weiss, A., Bates, T. C., & Luciano, M. (2008). Happiness is a personal(ity) thing—The genetics of personality and well-being in a representative sample. Psychological Science, 19(3), 205–210.

  57. Zebrowitz, L. A., Olson, K., & Hoffman, K. (1993). Stability of babyfaceness and attractiveness across the life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 453–466.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jennifer Tackett, Kelly L. Klump, Lindon Eaves, and Shigehiro Oishi, and Ivana Anusic for helpful comments. The preparation of this article was supported by a standard research grant of the Canadian Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council awarded to the first author.

Author information

Correspondence to Ulrich Schimmack.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schimmack, U., Lucas, R.E. Environmental Influences on Well-Being: A Dyadic Latent Panel Analysis of Spousal Similarity. Soc Indic Res 98, 1–21 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9516-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Well being
  • Satisfaction
  • Environment
  • Longitudinal
  • Dyadic
  • Couples
  • Spouses
  • Heritability