Social Indicators Research

, Volume 97, Issue 3, pp 299–323 | Cite as

Increasing Inequality in Social Exclusion Occurrence: The Case of Sweden During 1979–2003

  • Miia BaskEmail author


In this paper, we examine the risk of social exclusion among the Swedish population from a longitudinal perspective. In the empirical analysis, a person is considered socially excluded if he or she suffers from at least two of the following six welfare problems: chronic unemployment, economic problems, health problems, experiences of threat or violence, crowded housing and lack of interpersonal relationships. Our three main findings are as follows: There is no evidence that immigrants have been better integrated into Swedish society over time from the perspective of social exclusion risk. Instead, there are weak signs that their situation has become worse. Further, even though men are worse off than women as regards the odds for social exclusion, there are weak signs that their relative situation has improved over time. Finally, compared to couples without children, there is clear evidence that the odds for social exclusion for singles with children have increased over time and that the odds for social exclusion for couples with children have decreased over time. We can, therefore, conclude that among these groups, the inequality has increased over time. To be able to make these conclusions, we have fitted several specifications of a logistic regression model with random effects for panel data to our data set.


Inequality Longitudinal analysis Social exclusion 


  1. Atkinson, A. B. (1998). Social exclusion, poverty and unemployment. In A. B. Atkinson & J. Hills (Eds.), Exclusion, employment and opportunity. CASE Paper No. 4. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  2. Bask, M. (2005). Welfare problems and social exclusion among immigrants in Sweden. European Sociological Review, 21, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bask, M. (2007). Social exclusion across the life-course: A look at Swedish data. Umeå: Umeå University. (Version: November 15, 2007).Google Scholar
  4. Bernhardt, E., & Gähler, M. (2003). Skilsmässa påverkar kontakterna med vuxna barn. Välfärd, No. 2.Google Scholar
  5. Bradshaw, J., & Finch, N. (2003). Overlaps in dimensions of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 32, 513–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J., & Piachaud, D. (2002). Degrees of exclusion: Developing a dynamic, multidimensional measure. In J. Hills, J. Le Grand, & D. Piachaud (Eds.), Understanding social exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Byrne, D. (2005). Social exclusion (2nd ed.). Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chakravarty, S. R., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2006). The measurement of social exclusion. Review of Income and Wealth, 52, 377–398.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, P. N., & Huffman, M. L. (2003). Individuals, jobs, and labor markets: The devaluation of women’s work. American Sociological Review, 68, 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edgren-Schori, M. (2000). Social exclusion: En kunskapsöversikt och begreppsanalys. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  11. Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fritzell, J., & Lundberg, O. (2000). Välfärd, ofärd och ojämlikhet. SOU 2000:41. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  13. Gallie, D., Paugam, S., & Jacobs, S. (2003). Unemployment, poverty and social isolation: Is there a vicious circle of social exclusion? European Societies, 5, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. George, L. K. (2001). The social psychology of health. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (5th ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Halleröd, B., & Bask, M. (2008). Accumulation of welfare problems in a longitudinal perspective. Social Indicators Research, 88, 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halleröd, B., & Heikkilä, M. (1999). Poverty and social exclusion in the Nordic countries. In M. Kautto, M. Heikkilä, B. Hvinden, S. Marklund, & N. Ploug (Eds.), Nordic social policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Halleröd, B., & Westberg, A. (2006). Youth problem: What’s the problem? A longitudinal study of incomes and economic hardship among Swedish youth. Acta Sociologica, 49, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jonsson, J. O., & Gähler, M. (1997). Family dissolution, family reconstruction, and children’s educational careers: Recent evidence for Sweden. Demography, 34, 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kennedy, B. P., Kawachi, I., Glass, R., & Prothrow-Stith, D. (1999). Income distribution, socioeconomic status, and self-rated health. In I. Kawachi, B. P. Kennedy, & R. G. Wilkinson (Eds.), The society and population health reader. Volume I: Income inequality and health. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  20. Korpi, T., Nelson, K., & Stenberg, S.-Å. (2007). The accumulation of social problems 1974–2000. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16, S91–S103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu, G., & Vikat, A. (2004). Does divorce risk depend on spouses’ relative income? A register-based study of first marriages in Sweden in 1981–1998. MPIDR Working Paper WP 2004–010.Google Scholar
  22. Maume, D. J., Jr. (2004). Is the glass ceiling a unique form of inequality? Evidence from a random-effects model of managerial attainment. Work and Occupations, 31, 250–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pendergast, J. F., Gange, S. J., Newton, M. A., Lindstrom, M. J., Palta, M., & Fisher, M. R. (1991). A survey of methods for analyzing clustered binary response data. International Statistical Review, 64, 89–118.Google Scholar
  24. Petersen, T., & Morgan, L. A. (1995). Separate and unequal: Occupation-establishment sex segregation and the gender wage gap. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 329–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Silver, H. (1995). Reconceptualizing social disadvantage: Three paradigms of social exclusion. In G. Rodgers, C. Gore, & J. B. Figueiredo (Eds.), Social exclusion: Rhetoric, reality, responses. Geneve: International Institute for Labour Studies.Google Scholar

Online references

  1. Council of Europe. (2003). Recent demographic developments in Europe. From Accessed Jan 2008.
  2. European Union. (2000). Fight against poverty and social exclusion – Definition of appropriate objectives. From Accessed Jan 2008.
  3. Government Offices of Sweden. (2003). Sweden’s action plan against poverty and social exclusion 2003–2005. From Accessed Jan 2008.
  4. Schyman, G. (2002). Kärnfamiljen – en källa till mycket ont. From Accessed Jan 2008.
  5. Statistics Sweden. (2009). From Accessed Aug 2009.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Helsinki Collegium for Advanced StudiesUniversity of HelsinkiUniversity of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations