Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Care for Sick Children as a Proxy for Gender Equality in the Family

Abstract

Swedish parents are entitled to government paid benefits to take care of sick children. In this paper we show that the gender distribution of paid care for sick children is a good proxy for the gender division of household work. Using two examples we show that registry data on care for sick children is a useful data source for studies on gender equality in the family. Our first example shows that increased effort at work leads to a lower effort in household work, and a higher effort at home for the other spouse. Our second example provides some evidence for a pro-cyclical pattern in gender equality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more detailed information on the Level of Living survey, see Erikson and Åberg (1987); Gähler (2004).

  2. 2.

    Evertsson and Nermo (2007) performed a panel study of low frequency using survey data from LNU 1991 and 2000.

  3. 3.

    For many variables we have data over a longer time span.

  4. 4.

    See Ekberg et al. (2005).

  5. 5.

    Source: Statistics Sweden.

  6. 6.

    A revealed preference does not say anything of why this difference exists, be it due to social constraints like gender roles, or something else. The important thing here is that regardless of the cause of this gender difference in preferences, the bargaining outcome will be affected by it.

References

  1. Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 715–733.

  2. Amilon, A. (2007). On the sharing of temporary parental leave: The case of Sweden. Review of Economics of the Household, 5, 385–404.

  3. Becker, G. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.

  4. Becker, G. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  5. Bergstrom, T. (1996). Economics in a family way. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1903–1934.

  6. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.

  7. Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

  8. Chiappori, P.-A. (2000). Collective labor supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 437–467.

  9. Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208–1233.

  10. Ekberg, J., Eriksson, R., & Friebel, G. (2005). Parental leave—A policy evaluation of the Swedish “Daddy-Month” Reform. IZA Discussion Papers 1617.

  11. England, P., & Kilbourne, B. S. (1990). Markets, marriages, and other mates: The problem of power. In R. Friedland & A. F. Robertson (Eds.), Beyond the marketplace. Rethinking economy and society (pp. 163–188). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

  12. Erikson, R., & Åberg, R. (1987). Welfare in transition. A survey of living conditions in Sweden 1968–1981. Oxford: Claredon Press.

  13. Eriksson, R., & Nermo, M. (2008). Care for sick children as a proxy for gender equality. S-WoPEC Working Paper 1/2008, Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University.

  14. Evertsson, M., & Nermo, M. (2004). Dependence within families and the division of labour: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1272–1286.

  15. Evertsson, M., & Nermo, M. (2007). Changing resources and the division of housework: A longitudinal study of Swedish couples. European Sociological Review, 23, 455–470.

  16. Gähler, M. (2004). Levnadsnivåundersökningen (LNU). In M. Bygren, M. Gähler, & M. Nermo (Eds.), Familj och Arbete—vardagsliv i förändring (pp. 322–327). Stockholm: SNS Förlag.

  17. Gershuny, J. (2000). Changing times: Work and leisure in postindustrial society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  18. Hart, R. A. (2006). Worker-job matches, job mobility and real wage cyclicality. Economica, 73, 287–298.

  19. Hersch, J. (1991a). The impact of nonmarket work on market wages. American Economic Review, 81, 157–160.

  20. Hersch, J. (1991b). Male-female differences in hourly wages—the role of human-capital, working-conditions, and housework. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44, 746–759.

  21. Hersch, J., & Stratton, L. S. (1994). Housework, wages, and the division of housework time for employed spouses. American Economic Review, 84, 120–125.

  22. Hersch, J., & Stratton, L. S. (1997). Housework, fixed effects, and wages of married workers. Journal of Human Resources, 32, 285–307.

  23. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon Books.

  24. Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 988–1010.

  25. Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 139–158.

  26. Park, S., & Shin, D. (2005). Explaining procyclical male-female wage gaps. Economic Letters, 88, 231–235.

  27. Sayer, L. C. (2005). Gender, time and inequality: Trends in women’s and men’s paid work, unpaid work and free time. Social Forces, 84, 285–303.

  28. Sayer, L. C., Bianchi, S. E., & Robinson, J. P. (2004). Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers’ and fathers’ time with children. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1–43.

  29. Solon, G. R., Barsky, R., & Parker, J. A. (1994). Measuring the cyclicality of real wages: How important is composition bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 1–25.

  30. Sundström, M., & Duvander, A.-Z. (2002). Gender division of childcare and the sharing of parental leave among new parents in Sweden. European Sociological Review, 18, 433–447.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to one anonymous reviewer for valuable comments and suggestions. We also wish to thank the Swedish council for working life and social research (FAS) for financial support.

Author information

Correspondence to Magnus Nermo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eriksson, R., Nermo, M. Care for Sick Children as a Proxy for Gender Equality in the Family. Soc Indic Res 97, 341–356 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9505-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Gender equality
  • Time use
  • Household work
  • Unemployment
  • Business cycles