Social Indicators Research

, Volume 97, Issue 2, pp 229–246

The Danish Effect: Beginning to Explain High Well-Being in Denmark

Article

Abstract

Although income and happiness have been linked at both the individual and national levels of analysis, few studies have specifically examined the different relationships between these two variables in affluent nations. This study investigates various measures of well-being in both the United States and Denmark. Respondents in both countries reported high levels of well-being but Americans generally reported greater positive and negative affect while Danes reported higher levels of satisfaction and enjoyment. Interestingly, low income respondents in the United States reported higher negative affect and lower life satisfaction than their counterparts in Denmark. For positive affect, the major difference between the two countries was found among high income respondents. The key to understanding differences in the well-being of these two nations appears to lie in understanding the well-being of the poor. Suggestions for future directions in research are discussed.

Keywords

Life satisfaction Positive affect Happiness Denmark USA Income 

References

  1. Aristotle (1986/4th Cent. BCE). Nichomachean ethics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Balatsky, G., & Diener, E. (1993). Subjective well-being among Russian students. Social Indicators Research, 28, 225–243. doi:10.1007/BF01079019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berntsson, X., & Kohler, X. (2001). Quality of life among children aged 2–17 years in the five Nordic countries: Comparison between 1984 and 1996. European Journal of Public Health, 11, 437–445. doi:10.1093/eurpub/11.4.437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Material wealth and subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 307–322). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2006). Subjective well-being of the homeless, and related lessons for happiness. Social Indicators Research, 76, 185–205. doi:10.1007/s11205-005-8671-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biswas-Diener, R., Vittersø, J., & Diener, E. (2005). Most people are pretty happy, but there is cultural variation: The Inughuit, the Amish, and the Maasai. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 205–226. doi:10.1007/s10902-005-5683-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the rash model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mathwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Brinkerhoff, M. B., Fredell, K. A., & Frideres, J. S. (1997). Basic minimum needs, quality of life and selected correlates: Exploration in villages in northern India. Social Indicators Research, 42, 245–281. doi:10.1023/A:1006834830518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, L. B. (1993). The psychology of religion in Scandinavia. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 3, 47–67. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0301_7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concern. Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cheung, M. W. L., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconseptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1–27. doi:10.1177/014920639902500101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conner, K. A., Dorfman, L. T., & Tompkins, J. B. (1985). Life satisfaction of retired professors: The contribution of work, health, income, and length of retirement. Educational Gerontology, 11, 337–347. doi:10.1080/0380127850110602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? A literature review and guide to needed research. Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169. doi:10.1023/A:1014411319119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Boston, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1995). The wealth of nations revisited: Income and quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 36, 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Horwitz, J., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). Happiness of the very wealthy. Social Indicators Research, 16, 263–274. doi:10.1007/BF00415126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Napa-Scollon, C. K., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgments: Global happiness is not the sum of its parts. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 159–176. doi:10.1023/A:1010031813405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Aroroa, R. (in press). Wanting, liking, and other reasons money might be associated with happiness: The First survey of Planet Earth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  20. Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Are Scandinavians happier than Asians? Issues in comparing nations on subjective well-being. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Politics and economics of Asia. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). Measuring subjective well-being to compare quality of life of cultures. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Economist. (2006). Pocket world in figures. London: Profile Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Gallup, Inc. (2007). The state of global well-being 2007. New York: Gallup Press.Google Scholar
  24. Haavind, H., & Magnusson, E. (2005). The Nordic countries–welfare paradises for women and children? Feminism & Psychology: An International Journal, 15, 229–237.Google Scholar
  25. Hagerty, M. R. (2000). Social comparisons of income in one’s community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 764–771. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H. D. (2000). Genes, culture, and happiness. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Subjective well-being across cultures. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  27. Kasser, T. (2003). The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. King James Bible. (1991). New York: Ivy Books.Google Scholar
  29. Marx, C. (1848/1988). The communist manifesto. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
  30. Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  31. Matthews, G., & Izuierdo, C. (2009). Anthropology, happiness and well-being. In G. Matthews & C. Izuierdo (Eds.), Pursuits of happiness: Well-being in anthropological perspective (1–19). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  32. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  33. Rost, J., Carstensen, C., & von Davier, M. (1997). Applying the mixed rasch model to personality questionnaires. In J. Rost & R. Langeheine (Eds.), Application of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences (pp. 324–332). Münster: Waxman.Google Scholar
  34. Schor, J. B. (1999). The overspent American: Why we want what we don’t need. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  35. Schyns, P. (2000). The relationship between income, changes in income and life satisfaction in West Germany and the Russian Federation: Relative, absolute, or a combination of both? In E. Diener & D. R. Rahtz (Eds.), Advances in quality of life theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 83–109). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  36. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  37. Snyder, C. R. (2000). Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tov, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The well-being of nations: Linking together trust, cooperation, and democracy. In B. A. Sullivan, M. Snyder, & J. L. Sullivan (Eds.), Cooperation: The political psychology of effective human interaction (pp. 323–342). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Tsai, J. (2008). Ideal affect: Cultural causes and behavioral consequences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 242–259. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00043.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 29–37. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.13.1.29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24, 1–34. doi:10.1007/BF00292648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Veenhoven, R. (1993). Happiness in nations: Subjective appreciation of life in 55 nations 1996–1990. Rotterdam: RISBO.Google Scholar
  43. Veenhoven, R., & Hagerty, M. (2003). Rising happiness in nations 1946–2004: A reply to Easterlin. Social Indicators Research, 79, 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vogel, J. (2002). Welfare production, poverty and wealth: A comparative and longitudinal perspective. In W. Glatzer (Ed.), Rich and poor: Disparities, perceptions, concomitants (pp. 235–270). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  45. von Davier, M. (2000). WINMIRA 32 user manual. Kiel, Germany: IPN—Institute for Science Education.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Biswas-Diener
    • 1
  • Joar Vittersø
    • 2
  • Ed Diener
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Applied Positive PsychologyPortlandUSA
  2. 2.University of TromsøTromsøNorway
  3. 3.University of IllinoisChampaignUSA
  4. 4.The Gallup OrganizationWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations