Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, 94:363 | Cite as

Self-Informant Agreement in Well-Being Ratings: A Meta-Analysis

  • Leann Schneider
  • Ulrich SchimmackEmail author
Article

Abstract

A meta-analysis of published studies that reported correlations between self-ratings and informant ratings of well-being (life-satisfaction, happiness, positive affect, negative affect) was performed. The average self-informant correlation based on 44 independent samples and 81 correlations for a total of 8,897 participants was r = 0.42 [99% credibility interval = 0.39|0.45]. Statistically reliable moderators of agreement were construct (life-satisfaction = happiness > positive affect > negative affect), age of the target participant (older > younger), number of informants (multiple > single), and number of items in the measure (multiple > single). The implications for the validity of self-ratings of well-being as indicators of well-being are discussed.

Keywords

Well being Positive affect Negative affect Life satisfaction Happiness Self-rating Informant rating Validity Measurement 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Simone Walker, Naoki Nakazato, and the members of the well-being laboratory at the University of Toronto Mississauga for their valuable comments.

References

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis

  1. *Barsky, A., Thoresen, C. J., Warren, C. R., & Kaplan, S. A. (2004). Modelling negative affectivity and job stress: A contingency-based approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 915–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. *Bassett, S. S., Magaziner, J., & Hebel, J. R. (1990). Reliability of proxy response on mental health indices for aged, community-dwelling women. Psychology and Aging, 5, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. *Borkenau, P., & Mauer, N. (2007). Well-being and the accessibility of pleasant and unpleasant concepts. European Journal of Personality, 21, 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borsboom, D. (2006). The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika, 71(3), 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (P-less-than .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connolly, J. J., Kavanagh, E. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2007). The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. *Dew, T., & Huebner, E. S. (1994). Adolescents’ perceived quality of life—an exploratory investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. *Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global judgments of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65, 245–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. *Eisenberg, N., et al. (1994). The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional and situational empathy-related responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 776–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. *Gilligan, T. D., & Huebner, E. S. (2002). Multidimensional life satisfaction reports of adolescents: A multitrait-multimethod study. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1149–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. *Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (1997). Children’s reports of their life satisfaction—convergence across raters, time and response formats. School Psychology International, 18, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. *Hartmann, G. W. (1934). Personality traits associated with variations in happiness. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 29, 202–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. *Heller, D., Watson, D., & Ilies, R. (2006). The dynamic process of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 74, 1421–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. *Huebner, E. S., Brantley, A., Nagle, R. J., & Valois, R. F. (2002). Correspondence between parent and adolescent ratings of life satisfaction for adolescents with and without mental disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. *Judge, T. A., & Locke, E. A. (1993). Effect of dysfunctional thought processes on subjective well-being and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. *Kammann, R., Smith, R., Martin, C., & McQueen, M. (1984). Low accuracy in judgments of others’ psychological well-being as seen from a phenomenological perspective. Journal of Personality, 52, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. *Kozma, A., & Stones, M. J. (1988). Social desirability in measures of subjective well-being—age comparisons. Social Indicators Research, 20, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. *Lepper, H. S. (1998). Use of other-reports to validate subjective well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 44, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. *Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. *Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  25. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. *Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 28, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. *Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale—evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. *Phillips, B. M., Lonigan, C. J., Driscoll, K., & Hooe, E. S. (2002). Positive and negative affectivity in children: A multitrait-multimethod investigation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 465–479.Google Scholar
  29. *Pruchno, R. A., Lemay, E. R., Field, L., & Levinsky, N. G. (2006). Predictors of patient treatment preferences and spouse substituted judgments: The case of dialysis continuation. Medical Decision Making, 26, 112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. *Sandvik, E., Diener, E., & Seidlitz, L. (1993). Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 61, 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schimmack, U. (2008). Wellbeingscience.org—the science of wellbeing (2008, September 25). Retrieved October 20, 2008, from http://www.erin.utoronto.ca/~w3psyuli/WellBeingScience/wellbeingscience.htm.
  32. *Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (2003). Predictive validity of explicit and implicit self-esteem for subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schimmack, U., & Oishi, S. (2005). The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  35. *Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. *Walker, S. S., & Schimmack, U. (2008). Validity of a happiness implicit association test as a measure of subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 490–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. *Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1991). Self-versus peer ratings of specific emotional traits: Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 927–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. *Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 546–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. *Watson, D., & Humrichouse, J. (2006). Personality development in emerging adulthood: Integrating evidence from self-ratings and spouse ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 959–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Whitener, E. M. (1990). Confusion of confidence-intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson, W. (1967). Correlates of avowed happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 294–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Toronto MississaugaMississaugaCanada

Personalised recommendations