Social Indicators Research

, Volume 93, Issue 3, pp 509–525 | Cite as

Relatively Different? How do Gender Differences in Well-Being Depend on Paid and Unpaid Work in Europe?

Article

Abstract

Absolute as well as relative hours of paid and unpaid work may influence well-being. This study investigates whether absolute hours spent on paid work and housework account for the lower well-being among women as compared to men in Europe, and whether the associations between well-being and hours of paid work and housework differ by gender attitudes and social context. Attitudes towards women’s and men’s paid work and housework obligations may influence how beneficial or detrimental it is to spend time on these activities, as may social comparison of one’s own hours to the number of hours commonly spent among similar others. A group of 13,425 women and men from 25 European countries are analysed using country fixed-effects models. The results suggest that while men’s well-being appears to be unaffected by hours of paid work and housework, women’s well-being increases with increased paid working hours and decreases with increasing housework hours. Gender differences in time spent on paid work and housework account for a third of the European gender difference in well-being and are thus one reason that women have lower well-being than men have. Gender attitudes do not appear to modify the associations between hours and well-being, but there is a tendency for women’s well-being to be higher the less housework they do compared to other women in the same family situation and country. However, absolute hours of paid work and housework appear to be more important to women’s well-being than relative hours.

Keywords

Well-being Paid working hours Housework hours Gender Gender attitudes Social comparison Europe 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper was produced as part of the Economic Change, Quality of Life and Social Cohesion (EQUALSOC) Network of Excellence, funded by the European Commission (DG Research) as part of the Sixth Framework Programme. See editors’ introduction for further details. This paper has greatly benefited from comments and suggestions from Olof Bäckman, Jan O. Jonsson and Marie Evertsson, from the anonymous Social Indicators Research reviewers and from the authors and editors of this special issue.

References

  1. Aliaga, C. (2006). How is the time of women and men distributed in Europe? Statistics in Focus, Population and Social Conditions 4/2006. European Communities.Google Scholar
  2. Bird, C. E. (1999). Gender, household labor, and psychological distress: The impact of the amount and division of housework. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 32–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bird, C. E., & Fremont, A. M. (1991). Gender, time use, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 114–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boye, K. (2008). Time spent working. Is there a link between time spent on paid work and housework and the gender difference in psychological distress? In K. Boye (Ed.), Happy hour? Studies on well-being and time spent on paid and unpaid work. Swedish Institute for Social Research Dissertation Series No. 74.Google Scholar
  5. Buunk, B. P., Kluwer, E. S., Schuurman, M. K., & Siero, F. W. (2000). The division of labor among egalitarian and traditional women: Differences in discontent, social comparison, and false consensus. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 759–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corrigall, E. A., & Konrad, A. M. (2007). Gender role attitudes and careers: A longitudinal study. Sex Roles, 56, 847–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crompton, R., & Lyonette, C. (2005). The new gender essentialism—Domestic and family ‘choices’ and their relation to attitudes. British Journal of Sociology, 56, 601–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham, M. (2005). Gender in cohabitation and marriage—The influence of gender ideology on housework allocation over the life course. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 1037–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frankenhaeuser, M., Lundberg, U., Fredrikson, M., Melin, B., Tuomisto, M., Myrsten, A. L., et al. (1989). Stress on and off the job as related to sex and occupational-status in white-collar workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gager, C. T. (1998). The role of valued outcomes, justifications, and comparison referents in perceptions of fairness among dual-earner couples. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 622–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gähler, M., & Rudolphi, F. (2004). När vi två blir tre—Föräldraskap, psykiskt välbefinnande och andra levnadsbetingelser [When two become three—Parenthood, psychological well-being, and other life circumstances]. In M. Bygren, M. Gähler, & M. Nermo (Eds.), Familj och arbete—vardagsliv i förändring [Family and work—everyday life in transition]. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.Google Scholar
  15. Glass, J., & Fujimoto, T. (1994). Housework, paid work, and depression among husbands and wives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldberg, A. E., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2004). Division of labor and working-class women’s well-being across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Himsel, A. J., & Goldberg, W. A. (2003). Social comparisons and satisfaction with the division of housework: Implications for men’s and women’s role strain. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 843–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karasek, R., Gardell, B., & Lindell, J. (1987). Work and nonwork correlates of illness and behavior in male and female Swedish white-collar workers. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 8, 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kessler, R. C., & McRae, J. A. (1982). The effect of wives employment on the mental health of married men and women. American Sociological Review, 47, 216–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kroska, A. (1997). The division of labor in the home: A review and reconceptualization. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 304–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loscocco, K., & Spitze, G. (2007). Gender patterns in provider role attitudes and behavior. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 934–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McDonough, P., & Walters, V. (2001). Gender and health: Reassessing patterns and explanations. Social Science and Medicine, 52, 547–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (1992). You can’t always get what you want: Incongruence between sex-role attitudes and family work roles and its implications for marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 537–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McRae, S. (2003). Constraints and choices in mothers’ employment careers: A consideration of Hakim’s preference theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 54, 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merton, R. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1995). Sex differences in distress—Real or artifact. American Sociological Review, 60, 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nordenmark, M. (2004). Does gender ideology explain differences between countries regarding the involvement of women and of men in paid and unpaid work? International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perry-Jenkins, M. (1992). Linkages between women’s provider-role attitudes, psychological well-being, and family relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Piña, D. L., & Bengtson, V. L. (1993). The division of household labor and wives happiness—Ideology, employment, and perceptions of support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 901–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Psychiatric Research Unit (2008). WHO-Five Well-being Index (WHO-5). Retrieved 02/26, 2008, from http://www.who-5.org.
  31. Roxburgh, S. (2004). ‘There just aren’t enough hours in the day’: The mental health consequences of time pressure. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vanyperen, N. W., & Buunk, B. P. (1991). Sex-role attitudes, social-comparison, and satisfaction with relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wheeler, L., & Miyake, K. (1992). Social comparison in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 760–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI)Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations