Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Sacrificing Their Careers for Their Families? An Analysis of the Penalty to Motherhood in Europe

Abstract

This paper examines the extent of and the mechanisms behind the penalty to motherhood in six European countries. Each country provides different levels of support for maternal employment allowing us to determine institutional effects on labour market outcome. While mothers tend to earn less than non-mothers, the penalty to motherhood is considerably lower in countries with policy support for working mothers. The paper establishes the United Kingdom and West Germany to have the least policy support for working mothers as well as the largest penalties to motherhood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The statistical analyses are restricted to West Germany given the ongoing differences in the labour market performance of East and West Germany.

  2. 2.

    It should be noted that Davies and Pierre’s analysis of ‘old’ mothers is likely to be more typical of the ‘average’ mother, with the mean age of mothers at (all) birth(s) varying between 28.9 and 30.8 years (Table 1).

  3. 3.

    Further information can be found at: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/.

  4. 4.

    Further information can be found at: http://circa.europa.eu/irc/dsis/echpanel/info/data/information.html.

  5. 5.

    Davies and Pierre (2005) found German and British mothers, who were aged 25 years or over at the age of birth, had greater penalties when they had more than one child. Harkness and Waldfogel (2003) found a similar dynamic in Germany, the UK and Finland.

  6. 6.

    These models controlled for occupational level, working hours, marital status, educational level, work experience and age.

References

  1. Avellar, S., & Smock, P. J. (2003). Has the price of motherhood declined over time? A cross-cohort comparison of the motherhood wage penalty. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 597–607.

  2. Becker, G. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  3. Berrington, A., Yongjian Hu, P., Smith, W. F., & Sturgis, P. (2008). A graphical chain model for reciprocal relationships between women’s gender role attitudes and labour force participation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 171, 89–108.

  4. Blau, D. (1991). Search for non-wage job characteristics: A test of the reservation wage hypothesis. Journal of Labour Economics, 9(2), 186–205.

  5. Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66(2), 204–225.

  6. Connolly, S., & Gregory, M. (2008). Moving down: Women’s part-time work and occupational change in britain, 1991–2001. Economic Journal, 118(526), 52–76.

  7. Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297–1338.

  8. Datta Gupta, N., & Smith, N. (2002). Children and career interruptions. Economica, 69, 609–629.

  9. Davies, R., & Pierre, G. (2005). The family gap in pay in Europe: A cross-country study. Labour Economics, 12(4), 469–486.

  10. Del Boca, D., & Wetzels, C. (2007). Social policies, labour markets and motherhood. UK: Cambridge University Press.

  11. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. New York: Oxford University Press.

  12. Eurostat. (2005). Gender gaps in the reconciliation between work and family life. Statistics in focus 4/2005. Brussels: Eurostat.

  13. Fortin, N. (2005). Gender role attitudes and the labour-market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(3), 416–438.

  14. Gariety, B., & Shaffer, S. (2001). Wage differentials associated with flextime monthly. Labor Review, 124(3), 68–75.

  15. Gash, V. (2008). Preference or constraint? Part-time workers’ transitions in Denmark, France and the United-Kingdom. Work, Employment and Society, 22(4), 655–674.

  16. Gash, V., & McGinnity, F. (2007). Fixed-term contracts—The new European inequality? Comparing West Germany and France. Socio-Economic Review, 5(3), 467–496.

  17. Gash, V., Mertens, A., & Romeu-Gordo, L. (2007). Are fixed-term jobs bad for your health? A comparison of Spain and Germany. European Societies, 9(3), 429–458.

  18. Glass, J. (2004). Blessing or curse? Work-family policies and mother’s wage growth over time. Work and Occupations, 31(3), 367–394.

  19. Gorgens, T. (2002). Reservation wages and working-hours for recently unemployed US women. Labour Economics, 9(1), 93–123.

  20. Harkness, S., & Waldfogel, J. (2003). The family gap in pay: Evidence from seven industrialized countries. Research in Labor Economics, 22, 369–414.

  21. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271.

  22. Himmelweit, S., & Sigala, M. (2005). Internal and external constraints on mothers’ employment. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 455–478.

  23. Joshi, H., Paci, P., & Waldfogel, J. (1999). The wages of motherhood: Better or worse? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 543–564.

  24. Kenjoh, E. (2005). New mothers’ employment and public policy in the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Japan. Labour, 19, 5–49.

  25. Kilbourne, B. S., George, F., Beron, K., Weir, D., & England, P. (1994). Returns to skill compensating differentials, and gender bias: Effects of occupational characteristics on the wages of white women and men. American Journal of Sociology, 100(3), 689–719.

  26. Neyer, G. (2003). Family policies and low fertility in western Europe. Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research Working Paper.

  27. Nicoletti, C., & Tanturri, M. L. (2005). Differences in delaying motherhood across european countries: Empirical evidence from the echp. ISER working paper. European Jounal of Population, 24(2), 157–183.

  28. O’Connell, P. J., & Gash, V. (2003). The effects of working-time, segmentation and labour market mobility on wages and pensions in Ireland. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(1), 71–95.

  29. OECD. (2001). Employment outlook. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

  30. Petersen, T., Penner, A. & Hogsnes, G. (2007). The motherhood wage penalty: Sorting versus differential pay. Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Working Paper Series, Paper number 156-07.

  31. Polavieja, J. G. (2007). Occupational sex composition and earnings: Individual and societal effects. DemoSoc Working Paper, 2007-22. Department of Political and Social Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.

  32. Russell, H., & O’Connell, P. (2001). Getting a job in Europe: The transition from unemployment to work among young people in nine European countries. Work, Employment and Society, 15, 1–24.

  33. Smith, A. (1976). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. In R. H. Campbell (Ed.), Works and correspondence of adam smith. London: Oxford University Press.

  34. Viitanen, T. K. (2005). Cost of childcare and female employment in the UK. Labour, 19, 149–179.

  35. Waldfogel, J. (1997). The effect of children on women’s wages. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 209–217.

  36. Wooldridge, (2000). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was produced as part of the Economic Change, Quality of Life and Social Cohesion (EQUALSOC) Network of Excellence, funded by the European Commission (DG Research) as part of the Sixth Framework Programme. See editors’ introduction for further details. I would like to thank the following for their thoughts and commentary on earlier drafts of this paper. Participants at the EQUALSOC network conferences and workshops, my colleagues at Manchester University: Wendy Olsen, Colette Fagan and Jill Rubery, as well two anonymous referees. Though this paper benefited from the contributions of many, Fran McGinnity deserves special mention for her very incisive, considerate but nonetheless persistent feedback. Any remaining errors are my own.

Author information

Correspondence to Vanessa Gash.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Sample means and proportions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gash, V. Sacrificing Their Careers for Their Families? An Analysis of the Penalty to Motherhood in Europe. Soc Indic Res 93, 569–586 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9429-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Wages
  • Maternal employment
  • Cross-national analysis