Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 94, Issue 2, pp 257–271 | Cite as

Affluence, Feelings of Stress, and Well-being

  • Weiting NgEmail author
  • Ed Diener
  • Raksha Aurora
  • James Harter
Article

Abstract

Data from the Gallup World Poll highlighted the differential relations between perceived stress, well-being, and wealth at the individual- versus nation-level. At the nation level, stress was a distinct concept from negative affect (NA). It correlated positively with well-being (positive affect, life satisfaction, and domain satisfaction) and wealth (as measured by income, gross domestic product, and modern conveniences). In contrast, NA correlated inversely with well-being and income. Although similar to NA at the individual level, stress showed weaker negative relations with well-being than NA did. In sum, nation-level stress and NA were related in the opposite direction to wealth (and poverty), well-being, and life expectancy. Furthermore, the concept of stress differed at the individual and nation levels. For the former, stress appeared to be purely a negative marker of affective well-being (albeit weaker than other discrete negative emotions); for the latter, it appeared to reflect lifestyle differences that were strongly associated with wealth, and with affective and cognitive well-being to a smaller degree.

Keywords

Stress Subjective well-being Wealth Income Satisfaction 

References

  1. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, S., Tyrrell, D., & Smith, A. (1993). Negative life events, perceived stress, negative affect, and susceptibility to the common cold. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, S., Doyle, W., & Baum, A. (2006). Socioeconomic status is associated with stress hormones. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68, 414–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  5. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., & Biwas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. (2000). Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: Relative standards, need fulfillment, culture, and evaluation theory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., Kahneman, D., Tov, W., Muller, G., Arora, R., & Harter, J. (2008). Quality of life on planet Earth (in preparation).Google Scholar
  12. Dua, J. (1993). The role of negative affect and positive affect in stress, depression, self-esteem, assertiveness, Type A behaviors, psychological health, and physical health. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 119, 517–552.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, G. W., & English, K. (2002). The environment of poverty: Multiple stressor exposure, psychophysiological stress, and socioemotional adjustment. Child Development, 73, 1238–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frisch, M. (1998). Quality of life therapy and assessment in health care. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garhammer, M. (2002). Pace of life and enjoyment of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 217–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gershuny, J., & Sullivan, O. (2001). Cross-national changes in time-use: Some sociological (hi)stories re-examined. British Journal of Sociology, 52, 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorgievski-Duijvesteijn, M., Bakker, A., Schaufeli, W., & van der Heijden, P. (2005). Finances and well-being: A dynamic equilibrium model of resources. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 210–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamermesh, D., & Lee, J. (2007). Stressed out on four continents: Time crunch or yuppie kvetch? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 374–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heylighen, F., & Bernheim, J. (2000a). Global progress I: Empirical evidence for ongoing increase in quality-of-life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 323–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heylighen, F., & Bernheim, J. (2000b). Global progress II: Empirical evidence for ongoing increase in quality-of-life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hinkle, L. (1973). The concept of ‘stress’ in the biological sciences. Science, Medicine and Man, 1, 31–48.Google Scholar
  22. Howell, R., & Howell, C. (2008). The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin (in press).Google Scholar
  23. Lantz, P., House, J., Mero, R., & Williams, D. (2005). Stress, life events, and socioeconomic disparities in health: Results from the Americans’ changing lives study. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 274–288.Google Scholar
  24. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. NewYork: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Levine, R., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). The pace of life in 31 countries. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 30, 178–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Linder, S. (1970). The harried leisure class. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005a). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005b). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, G. E., & Blackwell, E. (2006). Turning up the heat: Inflammation as a mechanism linking chronic stress, depression, and heart disease. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 269–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1998). Trend, gender, and status differences in Americans’ perceived stress. Society and Leisure, 21, 473–489.Google Scholar
  34. Roxburgh, S. (2004). ‘There just aren’t enough hours in the day’: The mental health consequences of time pressure. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: Ecco.Google Scholar
  36. Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Selye, H. (1976). The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Shields, M. (1999). Long working hours and health. Health Reports, 11, 1–17.Google Scholar
  39. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Veenhoven, R. (1995). Test of predictions implied in three theories of happiness: The cross-national pattern of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 34, 33–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life: Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wargo, E. (2007). Understanding the have-knots: The role of stress in just about everything. Observer, 20, 18–23.Google Scholar
  43. Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. (1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96, 234–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. World Bank. (2005). World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Weiting Ng
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ed Diener
    • 1
    • 3
  • Raksha Aurora
    • 3
  • James Harter
    • 3
  1. 1.University of IllinoisUrbana, ChampaignUSA
  2. 2.School of Arts and Social Sciences SIM UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.The Gallup OrganizationWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations