Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 7–18 | Cite as

Time Use and Subjective Well-Being in France and the U.S.

  • Alan B. Krueger
  • Daniel Kahneman
  • Claude Fischler
  • David Schkade
  • Norbert Schwarz
  • Arthur A. Stone
Article

Social scientists and policymakers have long been interested in comparing the subjective well-being (SWB) of populations over time and across countries, although SWB is hard to define and measure. Nevertheless, attempts have been made to rank countries based on SWB (e.g., Veenhoven 1996; OECD 2005). Cross-country data have also been used to study the effect on SWB of public policies, economic conditions and institutions (e.g., Alesina et al. 2002; Frey and Stutzer 2002; Blanchflower 2007). The most common measure of SWB in these studies is based on a question that asks respondents about their overall level of life satisfaction or happiness. Other measures of SWB include ecological momentary assessment (EMA; Stone et al. 1999) and the day reconstruction method (DRM; Kahneman et al. 2004). These measures collect individuals’ time use and affective experience over time, either using real-time data collection or diary recall methods. An advantage of such time-based SWB data is that they...

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Negative Emotion Time Allocation Affective Experience High Life Satisfaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2007). Measuring trends in leisure: The allocation of time over five decades. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 969–1006.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, A. F., Glaeser, E. L., & Sacerdote, B. (2002). Why doesn’t the US have a European-style welfare state? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 187–277.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchflower, D. G. (2007). Is unemployment more costly than inflation? Cambridge, MA: NBER Working Paper No. W13505.Google Scholar
  4. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness & economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gershuny, J., & Halpin, B. (1996). Time use, quality of life and process benefits. In A. Offer (Ed.), In pursuit of the quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Juster, F. T. (1985). Preferences for work and leisure. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.), Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 333–351). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  7. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
  8. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method (DRM). Science, December 3, pp. 1776–1780.Google Scholar
  9. Krueger, A. B. (2007). Are we having more fun yet? Categorizing and evaluating changes in time allocation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 38(2007-2), 193–218.Google Scholar
  10. Krueger, A., Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2008). National time accounting: The currency of life,” mimeo., Princeton University. Available at www.krueger.princeton.edu/nta2.pdf.
  11. Krueger, A., & Stone, A. (2008). Assessment of pain: A community-based diary survey in the USA. The Lancet, 371, 1519–1525.Google Scholar
  12. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). Society at a Glance: OECD Social Indicators—2005 Edition. Google Scholar
  13. Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S. S., & DeVries, M. W. (1999). Ecological momentary assessment. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 26–39). New York: Russell-Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Veenhoven, Ruut. (1996). Happy life-expectancy: A comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations. Social Indicators Research, 39, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan B. Krueger
    • 1
  • Daniel Kahneman
    • 1
  • Claude Fischler
    • 2
  • David Schkade
    • 3
  • Norbert Schwarz
    • 4
  • Arthur A. Stone
    • 5
  1. 1.Woodrow Wilson SchoolPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales and Centre National de la Reserche ScientifiqueParisFrance
  3. 3.University of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  4. 4.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  5. 5.Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations