Social Indicators Research

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 95–103 | Cite as

Making Time for Family: Schemas for Long-Term Family Memory



  1. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Battaglia, D. (1990). On the bones of the serpent: Person, memory, and mortality in Sabarl Island Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, J. (2004). Memory and modernity: Overcoming the social/individual divide in memory studies. In C. Casey & R. Edgerton (Eds.), The companion to psychological anthropology (pp. 103–120). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Conway, M. A. (1992). A structural model of autobiographical memory. In M. A. Conway, D. C. Rubin, H. Spinnler, & W. A. Wagenaar (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on autobiographical memory (pp. 167–193). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  5. Conway, M. A. (1995). Flashbulb memories. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1969). The Nuer: A description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a nilotic people. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Feeley-Harnik, G. (1991). Finding memories in Madagascar. In S. Küchler & W. Melion (Eds.), Images of memory: On remembering and representation (pp. 121–140). Washington, DC: The Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fitzgerald, J. M. (1988). Vivid memories and the reminiscence phenomenon: The role of a self-narrative. Human Development, 32, 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fivush, R. (in press A). Autobiography, time and history: Children’s construction of the past in family reminiscing. In N. Galanidou, L. H. Dommasnes, & V. Golding (Eds.), Telling children about the past: An interdisciplinary approach.Google Scholar
  10. Fivush, R. (in press B). Autobiography, time and history: Children’s construction of the past in family reminiscing. In N. Galanidou, L. H. Dommasnes, & V. Golding (Eds.), Telling children about the Past: An interdisciplinary approach. Google Scholar
  11. Fivush, R., Bohanek, J. G., & Duke, M. (in press). The intergenerational self: Subjective perspective and family history. In F. Sani (Ed.), Individual and collective self-continuity. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Geerts, C. (1973). Person, time and conduct in Bali. Chap. 14 in Interpretation of Cultures (pp. 360–411). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Gell, A. (1992). The anthropology of time: Cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  14. Kendall-Taylor, N., & Shore, B. (2002). Salem camp meeting as a theater of family memory. Emory Center for Myth and Ritual in American Life, MARIAL Working Paper 011-02.Google Scholar
  15. Shore, B. (1996). Culture in mind: Culture, cognition and the problem of meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Shore, B. (2005). Ritual and the developmental cycle of the American family. In J. Witte & S. Tipton (Eds.), The modern American family in interdisciplinary perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Shore, B. (2008). Spiritual work, memory work: Revival and recollection at Salem Camp Meeting. In N. Lutkehaus & C. Mattingly (Eds.), Essays in honor of Jerome Bruner special issue of Etho 36(1), 98–119.Google Scholar
  18. Winograd, E., & Neisser, U. (Eds.). (1992). Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of “flashbulb” memories. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.MARIAL CenterEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations