Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Time Use and Living Standards

  • 319 Accesses

  • 4 Citations

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Abraham, K., & Mackie, C. (2004). Beyond the market. Designing nonmarket accounts for the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

  2. Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2006). Measuring trends in leisure: The allocation of time over five decades. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 12082.

  3. Bittman, M., & Wajcman, J. (2004). The rush hour: The quality of leisure time and gender equity. In N. Folbre & M. Bittman (Eds.), Family time: The social organization of care. New York: Routledge.

  4. Budig, M., & Folbre, N. (2007). Activity, proximity or responsibility: Measuring parental childcare time. In N. Folbre & M. Bittman (Eds.), Family time, the social organization of care. New York: Routledge.

  5. Christopher, K. (2005). Welfare as we [don’t] know it: A review and feminist critique of welfare reform research. Feminist Economics, 10(2), 143–171.

  6. Christopher, K., England, P., Ross, K., Smeeding, T., & McLanahan, S. (2001). Gender inequality in poverty in affluent nations: The role of single motherhood and the state. In K. Vleminckx & T. Smeeding (Eds.), Child wellbeing, child poverty and child policy in modern nations (pp. 199–219). Bristol: The Policy Press.

  7. Citro, C., & Michael, R. (Eds.). (1995). Measuring poverty. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  8. Costa, D. (1998). The unequal work day: A long term view. American Economic Review, 88(2), 330–334.

  9. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 35–47.

  10. Eisner, R. (1989). The total incomes system of accounts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  11. Folbre, N. (2006). Measuring care: Gender, empowerment, and the care economy. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 183–200.

  12. Folbre, N. (2008a). Valuing children. Rethinking the economics of the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  13. Folbre, N. (2008b). Inequality and time use in the household. In W. Salverda, B. Nolan, & T. Smeeding (Eds.), The oxford handbook of economic inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.

  14. Folbre, N., & Wagman, B. (1993). Counting housework: New estimates of real product in the U.S., 1800–1860. The Journal of Economic History, 53(2), 275–288.

  15. Folbre, N., & Yoon, J. (2007). What is child care? Lessons from time use surveys of major English-speaking countries. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(3), 223–248.

  16. Freeman, R., & Schettkat, R. (2002). Marketization of production and the U.S.–Europe employment gap. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8797.

  17. Goodin, R. E., Rice, J. M., Parpo, A., & Eriksson, L. (2008). Discretionary time: A new measure of freedom. London: Cambridge University Press.

  18. Greenwood, J., Seshadri, A., & Youkoglu, M. (2005). Engines of liberation. Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), 109–133.

  19. Juster, T. F., & Stafford, F. (1985). Process benefits and the problem of joint production. In T. F. Juster & F. Stafford (Eds.), Time, goods, and well-being. Ann Arbor, Michigan: ISR.

  20. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review, 94(2), 429–434.

  21. Kitchen, P., & Muhajarine, N. (2008). Quality of life research: New challenges and new opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 85, 1–4.

  22. Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. (2003). Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The U.S. experience. Social Forces, 81, 999–1029.

  23. Mokyr, J. (2000). Why ‘more work for mother’? Knowledge and household behavior, 1870–1945. Journal of Economic History, 60(1), 1–41.

  24. Phipps, S. A., & Burton, P. S. (2007). Families, time, and money in Canada, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. Review of Income and Wealth, 53(3), 460–483.

  25. Ramey, V. (2008). Time spent in home production in the 20th century: New estimates from old data. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 13985.

  26. Ramey, V., & Francis, N. (2006). A century of work and leisure. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 12264.

  27. Reid, M. (1934). Economics of household production. New York: J. Wiley.

  28. Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Part, PA: Pennsylvania State University.

  29. Rosnick, D., & Weisbrot, M. (2006). Are shorter work hours good for the environment? A comparison of US and European energy consumption. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.

  30. Schor, J. (1993). The overworked American. The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.

  31. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox, manuscript. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, available at http://bpp.wharton.upenn.edu/betseys/papers/Happiness.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2008.

  32. Vickery, C. (1977). The time poor: A new look at poverty. Journal of Human Resources, 12(1), 27–48.

  33. Wagman, B., & Folbre, N. (1996). Household services and economic growth in the U.S., 1870–1930. Feminist Economics, 2(1), 43–66.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Nancy Folbre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Folbre, N. Time Use and Living Standards. Soc Indic Res 93, 77 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9407-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Living Standard
  • Household Production
  • Market Income
  • Adjust Household Income
  • Replacement Cost Method