Social Indicators Research

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 65–68 | Cite as

It’s Time to “Do Economics” with Time-Use Data

  • Daniel S. HamermeshEmail author

Time-use data are old and familiar in survey research, with the first rudimentary efforts going back nearly a century; and large-scale regularly collected data sets have been available in other countries (e.g., Germany, France) since 1965. It is only with the American Time Use Survey (ATUS) since 2003, however, that the US has moved from the derrière to the avant garde of data quality and quantity in the area of time-use surveys. With a large fraction of the economics profession resident in the US, and with American scholarly economics journals being the most prestigious outlets for economists worldwide, the advent of these data and the wider availability of similar, albeit smaller and/or irregular time-use surveys from other countries present economists with exciting opportunities.

The difficulty with these data sets is that they offer us the temptation of the quick tabulation and the simple regression on items that economists have not previously discussed: It is very easy to present...


Household Production Market Work Time Diary Labor Supply Decision Retirement Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abraham, K., & Mackie, C. (2005). Beyond the market: Designing nonmarket accounts for the United States. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2007). Measuring trends in leisure: The allocation of time over five decades. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 969–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burda, M., Hamermesh, D., & Weil, P. (2007). Total work, gender and social norms. NBER working paper no. 13000, March.Google Scholar
  5. Connolly, M. (2008). Here comes the rain again: Weather and the intertemporal substitution of leisure. Journal of Labor Economics, 26, 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Friedberg, L., & Webb, A. (2006). The chore wars: Household bargaining and leisure time. Working paper, University of Virginia, August.Google Scholar
  7. Gronau, R., & Hamermesh, D. (2006). Time vs. goods: The value of measuring household production technologies. Review of Income and Wealth, 52, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hallberg, D. (2003). Synchronous leisure, jointness and household labor supply. Labour Economics, 10, 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamermesh, D. (1990). Shirking or productive schmoozing: Wages and the allocation of time at work. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43, S121–S133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamermesh, D. (2002). Timing, togetherness and time windfalls. Journal of Population Economics, 15, 601–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamermesh, D. (2007). Time to eat: Household production under increasing income inequality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89, 852–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamermesh, D. (2008). Direct estimates of household production functions. Economics Letters, 98, 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamermesh, D., Myers, C. K., & Pocock, M. (2008). Cues for coordination and timing: Latitude, Letterman and longitude. Journal of Labor Economics, 26, 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Texas at Austin, IZA and NBERAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations