Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 171–176 | Cite as

Patterns of Workweek Schedules in France

  • Laurent Lesnard
  • Thibaut de Saint Pol
Article

Keywords

Economic System Multiple Correspondence Analysis Optimal Match Economic Space Weekly Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbott, A. (1995). Sequence analysis: New methods for old ideas. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, A., & Hrycak, A. (1990). Measuring resemblance in sequence analysis: An optimal matching analysis of musicians careers. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 144–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abbott, A., & Forrest, J. (1986). Optimal matching methods for historical sequences. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 16, 471–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benzécri, J.-P. (1994). Correspondence analysis handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  5. Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time.Google Scholar
  6. Directive 2000/34/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 June 2000 amending Council Directive 93/104/EC concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time to cover sectors and activities excluded from that Directive.Google Scholar
  7. Dumazedier, J. (1967). Toward a society of leisure?. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gershuny, J. (2000). Changing times: Work and leisure in postindustrial society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gershuny, J. (2005). Busyness as the badge of honor for the new superordinate working class. Social Research, 72, 287–314.Google Scholar
  10. Golden, L. (2001). Flexible work schedules: Which workers get them? American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1157–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and application of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hamermesh, D. S. (2002). Timing, togetherness, and time windfalls. Journal of Population Economics, 15, 601–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kingston, P. W., & Nock, S. L. (1987). Time together among dual-earner couples. American Sociological Review, 52, 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lesnard, L. (2004). Schedules as sequences: A new method to analyze the use of time based on collective rhythm with an application to the work arrangements of French dual-earner couples. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 1, 63–88.Google Scholar
  15. Lesnard, L. (2006). Optimal matching and the social sciences. Document de travail duCREST.Google Scholar
  16. Lesnard, L. (2008). Off-scheduling within dual-earner couples: An unequal and negative externality for family time. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 447–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lesnard, L., & Rice, J. M. (2007). Individual and couple work schedules: An Australia-France comparison. In XXVIIII Conference of the International Association for Time Use Research. Washington.Google Scholar
  18. Presser, P. B. (1987). Work shifts of full-time dual-earner couples: Patterns and contrasts by sex of spouse. Demography, 24, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robinson, J. P., Chenu, A., & Alvarez, A. S. (2002). Measuring the complexity of hours at work: The weekly work grid. Monthly Labor Review, 125, 44–54.Google Scholar
  20. Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Saint Pol, T. de. (2006). Le dîner des Français: un synchronisme alimentaire qui se maintient. Économie et Statistique, 400, 45–69.Google Scholar
  22. Wilson, W. C. (1998). Activity pattern analysis by means of sequence-alignment methods. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1017–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Observatoire sociologique du changement (Sciences Po & CNRS)Paris Cedex 07France
  2. 2.Laboratoire de sociologie quantitative (CREST-INSEE)MalakoffFrance
  3. 3.INSEEParis Cedex 14France

Personalised recommendations