Social Indicators Research

, Volume 93, Issue 2, pp 295–313 | Cite as

Does Cultural Capital Matter?: Cultural Divide and Quality of Life

  • Seoyong KimEmail author
  • Hyesun Kim


Since the remarkable work of Pierre Bourdieu, the concept of cultural capital has gained wide popularity along with theoretical and conceptual debates. This trend represents the social-structural change from materialism to postmaterialism. However, there are few empirical studies which find the cause and effect of cultural capital. Based on empirical survey data, this paper will analyze “how cultural capital and cultural divide influence the subjective well-being at the individual level.” Our analysis includes the following: First, we explore to what extent the cultural divide between haves and have-nots of cultural capital has impacted their subjective well-being, which consists of happiness and life satisfaction at the individual level. Second, we analyze what factors cause those cultural divides. Sociodemographic, social-relational, and economic variables are included in the regression models to test their relative explanatory power. Third, we discuss the implication for cultural policy.


Cultural capital Subjective well-being Cultural divide Quality of life 



This research was supported by research grant from Ajou University. I thank anonymous reviewers and editor for their comment.


  1. Belfiore, E. (2002). Art as a means of alleviating social exclusion; does it really work? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8(1), 91–106. doi: 10.1080/102866302900324658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In Richard K. Brown (Ed.), Knowledge, education and cultural change. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bowling, A., & Gabriel, Z. (2004). An integrational model of quality of life in older age results from the ESRC/MRC HSRC quality of life survey in Britain. Social Indicators Research, 69(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1023/B:SOCI.0000032656.01524.07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burack, O. R., Jefferson, P., & Libow, L. S. (2003). Individualized music: A route to improving the quality of life for long-term care residents. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 27(1), 63–76. doi: 10.1300/J016v27n01_05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bygren, L. O., Konlaan, B. B., & Johannsson, S.-E. (1996). Unequal in death. Attendance at cultural events, reading books or periodicals, and making music or singing in a choir as determinants for survival: Swedish interview survey of living conditions. British Medical Journal, 313(7072), 1577–1580.Google Scholar
  7. Cho, D. (2005). Social classes and culture in Korea: An empirical test of the cultural capital theory. Korean Journal of Sociology, 39(2), 1–33.Google Scholar
  8. Cho, K. (2006). Modes of leisure consumption and cultural capital: Bourdieu’s cultural theory. Tourism Science, 30(1), 379–401.Google Scholar
  9. Coalter, F. (2001). Realising the potential of cultural services: The case for the arts. Research briefing twelve point four. London: Local Government Association.Google Scholar
  10. Coffman, D. D., & Adamek, M. S. (1999). The contributions of wind band participation to quality of life of senior adults. Music Therapy Perspectives, 17(1), 27–31.Google Scholar
  11. De Graaf, N. D., Graaf, P. M., & Kraaykamp, G. (2000). Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in the Netherlands: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective. Sociology of Education, 73, 92–111. doi: 10.2307/2673239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation in the grades of US high school students. American Sociological Review, 47, 189–201. doi: 10.2307/2094962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DiMaggio, P. (2002). Taking the measure of culture. A meeting at Princeton University, June 7–8, 2002, Meeting prospectus,*artspol/ moc_prospectus.html.
  14. DiMaggio, P., & Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and marital selection. American Journal of Sociology, 90(6), 1231–1261. doi: 10.1086/228209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galloway, S. (2006). Cultural participation and individual quality of life: A review of research findings. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 323–342. doi: 10.1007/s11482-007-9024-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 359, 1435–1446. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeannotte, M. S. (2003). Singing alone? The contribution of cultural capital to social cohesion and sustainable communities. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 9(1), 35–49. doi: 10.1080/1028663032000089507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelly, S., McKenna, H., & Parahoo, K. (2001). The relationship between involvement in activities and quality of life for people with severe and enduring mental illness. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 8(2), 139–146. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2850.2001.00371.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matarasso, F. (1997). Use or ornament? The social impact of participation in the arts. Stroud: Comedia.Google Scholar
  20. Merli, P. (2002). Evaluating the social impact of participation in arts activities. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8(1), 107–118. doi: 10.1080/10286630290032477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Michalos, A. C. (2005). Arts and the quality of life: An exploratory study. Social Indicators Research, 71, 11–59. doi: 10.1007/s11205-004-8013-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Michalos, A. C. & Kahlke, P. M. (2008). Impact of arts-related activities on the perceived quality of life. Social Indicators Research (Accepted: 27 December 2007).Google Scholar
  23. Michalos, A. C., & Zumbo, B. D. (2000). Leisure activities, health and the quality of life. British Columbia: Institute for Social Research and Evaluation, University of Northern British Columbia.Google Scholar
  24. Ministry of Culture and Tourism (MCT) and Korea Culture & Tourism Institute (KCTI). (2006). Survey Report on Cultural Enjoyment. Seoul: MCT.Google Scholar
  25. Roberts, K. (2004). Leisure inequalities, class divisions and social exclusion in present-day Britain. Cultural Trends, 13(2), 57–71. doi: 10.1080/0954896042000267152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scottish Executive Social Research. (2005). Well-being and quality of life: Measuring the benefits of culture and sport: A literature review and think piece. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Education Department.Google Scholar
  27. Silverstein, M., & Parker, M. G. (2002). Leisure activities and quality of life among the oldest old in Sweden. Research on Aging, 24(5), 528–547. doi: 10.1177/0164027502245003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Staricoff, R. L. (2004). Arts in health: A review of the medical literature. Research Report 36. London: Arts Council England.Google Scholar
  29. Wood, N., & Smith, S. J. (2004). Instrumental routes to emotional geographies. Social & Cultural Geography, 5(4), 534–548. doi: 10.1080/1464936042000317686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yi, G. (2005). Cultural capital and social capital of the Korean elderly. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 25(3), 1–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public AdministrationAjou UniversityYeongtong-Gu, SuwonSouth Korea
  2. 2.Institute of Governmental StudiesKorea UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations