Social Indicators Research

, Volume 90, Issue 3, pp 339–349 | Cite as

Safety and Home–School Relations as Indicators of Children Well Being: Whose Perspective Counts?

  • Asher Ben-Arieh
  • James McDonell
  • Shalhevet Attar-Schwartz
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Recent attention to children’s well being has generated research showing that safety and home–school relations are two of the most important indicators of children’s well being. Recent studies have also demonstrated the consistent differences in perspectives between children and teachers and between parents and teachers in regard to home–school relations and between children and parents in regard to children safety. This paper reports findings from an exploratory study, conducted as part of the “Strong Communities” initiative in South Carolina, comparing between the three perspectives of children, parents, and teachers in regard to children both home–school relations and safety. The findings show significant differences regarding almost all items between the three groups. For example, teachers felt school and the way to and back from school were safer for children than how the children themselves felt. However, other patterns were found with regard to home–school relations. The article concludes with a discussion of the apparent weight given to each of these perspectives, possible explanations for the gaps found and its practical implications for social indicators usage.

Keywords

Safety Home–school relations Indicators of children well being 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aber, J. L., & Jones, S. (1997). Indicators of positive development in early childhood: Improving concepts and measures. In R. M. Hauser, B. V. Brown, & W. R. Prosser (Eds.), Indicators of children’s well-being (pp. 395–408). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications for cross-informants correlations for situational specifity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (2001). Hostile hallways: Bullying, teasing and sexual harassment in school. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Arieh, A., Kaufman, N. H., Andrews, A. B., Goerge, R., Lee, B. J., & Aber, L. (2001). Monitoring and measuring children’s well being. Dordrechet: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Benbenishty, R., & Astor, R. A. (2005). School violence in context: Culture, neighborhood, family, school, and gender. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Benbenishty, R., Khoury-Kassabri, M., & Astor, R. A. (2006). A national study of school violence in Israel 2005. Jerusalem, Israel: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  7. Christenson, S. L., & Sheridan, S. M. (2001). Schools and families: Creating essential connections for learning. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365–383.Google Scholar
  9. Garbarino, J. (1995). Raising children in a socially toxic environment. San-Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Handwerk, M. L., Lazarelere, R. E., Soper, S. H., & Friman, P. C. (1999). Parent and child discrepancies in reporting severity of problem behaviors in three out-of-home settings. Psychological Assessment, 11, 14–23. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.11.1.14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Limber, S. P., & Small, M. A. (2003). State laws and policies to address bullying in schools. School Psychology Review, 32(3), 345–455.Google Scholar
  12. McDonell, J. R., & Melton, G. B. (2008). Toward a science of community intervention. Family & Community Health, 31(2), 113–125.Google Scholar
  13. Melton, G. B., & Holaday, B. J. (2008). Strong communities as safe havens for children [Special Issue]. Family & Community Health, 31(2), 83–185.Google Scholar
  14. Melton, G. B., Limber, S. P., & Teague, T. L. (2000). Changing schools for changing families. In R. C. Pianta & M. J. Cox (Eds.), The transition to kindergarten (pp. 179–213). Baltimore, MD: Paul. H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  15. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Tomlinson, S. (2005). Education in a post-welfare society. Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Weissberg, R. P., & Greenberg, M. T. (1998). Prevention science and collaborative community action research: Combining the best from both perspectives. Journal of Mental Health, 7(5), 479–492. doi: 10.1080/09638239817860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asher Ben-Arieh
    • 1
  • James McDonell
    • 2
  • Shalhevet Attar-Schwartz
    • 1
  1. 1.Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Clemson UniversityClemsonUSA

Personalised recommendations