Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 90, Issue 2, pp 307–324 | Cite as

The Housing Domain of Quality of Life and Life Satisfaction in the Spontaneous Settlements on the Tehran Metropolitan Fringe

  • Esfandiar Zebardast
Article

Abstract

The aim of this article is to survey the spontaneous settlements on the Tehran Metropolitan Fringe (TMF), to determine the different housing sub-domains of quality of life (QOL), to survey overall life satisfaction and to determine the extent to which overall life satisfaction is explained by the components of the housing domain of QOL in these spontaneous settlements. Three spontaneous settlements on the TMF were selected by stratified random sampling method. Household interviews were conducted to gather the needed data. Nineteen indicators were selected to reflect the housing sub-domains of QOL. A factor analysis identified seven housing sub-domains of QOL: housing consolidation, housing amenities, housing space, housing quality, housing basic services, housing durability and security of tenure. In all three settlements surveyed, an inverse relationship was found between satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Very few residents expressed a neutral view about life satisfaction in the settlements surveyed. In all three settlements surveyed, respondents felt they were more satisfied with their life in their previous settlements. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the extent to which overall life satisfaction is explained by the seven extracted components of the housing domain of QOL. The results indicated that there is a direct relationship between the main reasons for migration to these settlements and the housing sub-domains of QOL.

Keywords

Tehran Metropolitan Fringe Housing domain of quality of life Spontaneous settlements Life satisfaction 

References

  1. Azizi, M. M. (2005). Analyzing urban housing indicators and their changes in Iran. Honar Hay-e Ziba, 23, 25–34.Google Scholar
  2. Boelhouwer, Y. (2002). Quality of life and living condition in the Netherlands. Social Indicators Research, 58, 115–140. doi: 10.1023/A:1015779732321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booysen, F. (2002). An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development. Social Indicators Research, 59, 115–151. doi: 10.1023/A:1016275505152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bratt, R. G. (2002). Housing and family well-being. Housing Studies, 17, 13–26. doi: 10.1080/02673030120105857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America: Recent patterns and trends. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Cutter, S. (1982). Residential satisfaction and the suburban homeowners. Urban Geography, 3, 315–327.Google Scholar
  7. Das, D. (2007). Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9191-6.
  8. Diener, E. (1995). A value based index for measuring national quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 36, 107–127. doi: 10.1007/BF01079721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunn, J. R. (2002). Housing and inequalities in health: A study of socioeconomic dimensions of housing and self reported health from a survey of Vancouver residents. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 671–681. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.9.671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans, D. R. (1994). Enhancing quality of life in the population at large. Social Indicators Research, 33, 47–88. doi: 10.1007/BF01078958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Everitt, B. S., & Dun, G. (1991). Applied multivariate data analysis. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  12. Ferriss, A. (2000). Quality of life among U.S. states. Social Indicators Research, 49, 1–23. doi: 10.1023/A:1006983012405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gabriel, S. A., Mattey, J. P., & Wascher, W. L. (2003). Compensating differentials and evolution in the quality of life among U.S. states. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33, 619–649. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0462(02)00007-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giannias, D. (1998). A quality of life based ranking of Canadian cities. Urban Studies, 35, 2241–2251. doi: 10.1080/0042098983863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Habibi, S. M. (1993). Eslamshahr; A perfect human settlement or a mixed human settlement. Ghofteghoo Magazine, 1, 62–85.Google Scholar
  16. Hemmasi, M., & Prorok, C. V. (2002). Women’s migration and quality of life in Turkey. Geoforum, 33, 399–411. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00020-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones, A., & Riseborough, M. (2002). Comparing quality of life research—international lessons. A Joint University of Birmingham and University of Bristol Research Project. Retrieved September 20, 2006, from Web site: www.curs.bham.ac.uk/pdfs/COMPARING%20QUALITY%20OF%20LIFE.pdf.
  18. Jeffres, L. W., & Dobos, J. (1995). Separating people’s satisfaction with life and public perceptions of the quality of life in the environment. Social Indicators Research, 34, 181–211. doi: 10.1007/BF01079196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamp, I. V., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & Hollander, A. D. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well being—towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; A literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 5–18. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00232-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mendes, J. F., & Motizuki, W. S. (2001). Urban quality of life evaluation scenarios: The case of Sao Carlos in Brazil. CTBUTH Review, 1, 1–11.Google Scholar
  22. O’Leary, B. (2007). Changes in the quality of life of Durban’s people. Social Indicators Research, 81, 357–373. doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-9013-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piran, P. (1995). Informal settlements in Iran. Ettelaat-e-Siasi va Eghtesadi, 95, 125–129.Google Scholar
  24. Rafiei, M., & Athari, K. (1995). Informal settlements in Iran; A survey of causes and solutions. Tehran: UPARC.Google Scholar
  25. Richards, R., O’Leary, B., & Mutsonziwa, K. (2007). Measuring quality of life in informal settlements in South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 81, 375–388. doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-9014-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Royuela, V., Surinach, J., & Reyes, M. (2003). Measuring quality of life in small areas over different periods of time; Analysis of the province of Barcelona. Social Indicators Research, 64, 51–74. doi: 10.1023/A:1024789306734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shaly, A. (1995). Housing in the broadest context in the United States. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 695–719.Google Scholar
  28. Shargh (2007). Tehran’s Mayor: Tehran’s marginal settlers have reached to the 3.5 million people. Daily Newspaper, July 3, 30.Google Scholar
  29. Sharma, S. (1996). Applied multivariate techniques. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Sheikhi, M. (2001). The process of formation and transformation of spontaneous settlements on TMF; A case study of Eslamshahr, Nasim Shahr and Golestan. Dissertation, University of TehranGoogle Scholar
  31. Sivam, A. (2002). Constraints affecting the efficiency of the urban residential land market in developing countries: A case study of India. Habitat International, 26, 523–537. doi: 10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00025-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Statistical Center of Iran—SCI. (1998). Iran statistical yearbook. Tehran: SCI.Google Scholar
  33. Turksever, A. N., & Atalik, G. (2001). Possibilities and limitations for the measurement of quality of life in urban areas. Social Indicators Research, 53, 163–187. doi: 10.1023/A:1026512732318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ulengin, B., Ulengin, F., & Guvenc, U. (2001). A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: The case of Istanbul. European Journal of Operations Research, 130, 361–374. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00047-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. UPARC—Urban Planning and Architecture Research Center of Iran. (1996). Tehran Metropolitan Plan, Report No. 2, Social aspects of settlements. Tehran: UPARC.Google Scholar
  36. Vera-Toscano, E., & Ateca-Amestoy, V. (2007). The relevance of social interactions on housing satisfaction. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9107-5
  37. Westaway, M. S. (2006). A longitudinal investigation of satisfaction with personal and environmental quality of life in an informal South African housing settlement, Doornkop, Soweto. Habitat International, 30, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zebardast, E. (2006). Marginalization of the urban poor and the expansion of the spontaneous settlements on the Tehran metropolitan fringe. Cities, 23, 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urban and Regional Planning, College of Fine ArtsUniversity of TehranTehranIslamic Republic of Iran

Personalised recommendations